Topic: Is it okay for a top 10 most trusted account too... (Read 875 times)

One of them is in your signature

What are the benefits of being a DT member?

How come i got all my negative for something from 2017 ?You where the one tagging it too ?

@killer i would recommend sending a PM to theymos.
Its not worth to expose from your orginal account as it will get quickly destroyed with negative ratings to discredit your arguments and proof.

DT members have a benefit being DT members even they won't admit it and try everything to stay in DT status playing the i like you when you like me game.
The double standards here have been proofen so many times that DT members ARE NOT tagging members even end of 2018 for not paying back a loan and trying to sell a legandary without informorming about it.
They"ll argument he doesn't deserve to get tagged but anybody else yes who would do the same staff.There are so many examples of these double standards and even suchmoon admitted in public that she requires other proof to tagg someone who is a "newbie" (none) than someone who is a hero member or higher (only hard proof) thats also why Quickseller asked the nice question why she stands no ground because if it would be a buddy of suchmoon she and the rest would never tagg him claiming he doesn't deserve it or any other BS and thats why she is so calm.

Had you asked that question for a simple "senior account" i bet everything would have agree to get him tagged for that but informing that its about a top 10 account makes them stay back and give no real opinion.


Just have a look who exectly is attacking you on this thread and you can instantly see its the same old punk and scammer group.

Yes. And he's laughing at you from under his dirty rug in the woods.

Grammar police here: Spilt (or spilled), not split.

Jokes aside, you said that the main reason why you are afraid to post it is retaliation. Now that Hhampuz offered to counter it, that argument is no longer valid.
Why keep the thread open and talk about it if you obviously don't want to do it? Isn't this what trolling is all about?

which one 72 or 73? I can never tell who is who



Ahhhhh.. I split the beans to the pharmacist. I settled my urge. The thread is still open because I figure what's the point of locking it

"I'll lock the thread". 12 hours later thread still open which leads me to believe you want to spill the beans KY. Just do it already! I'll counter any neg you'd receive (if it would happen) since you would only be sharing some concerns.

Killyou is back and trolling everyone ... Way to go buddy...

My guess is 3 or less, but I'm not good at math problems!

I am not sure it was a consensus, but was more like a small number of people who are very loud in voicing their opinion.

My last post was literally 4-sentences. How short is your attention span?

How come you can post pages of text that don't mean anything? Can you help me understand that? You always post sooooo many more sentences than necessary.

I was looking for opionons, I didn't have anyone in particular in mind. Just opionons from anyone that could write something that sounded good.

It seems strange that you would pass the responsibility onto The Pharmacist, when apparently only OG Nasty's opinion mattered up to that point. I am confused, if you had a clear subset of users that you wanted an opinion from (like OGNasty), why didn't you just send them a PM? Instead you posted a public thread, and wound up telling all of us that our opinion is irrelevant. Help me understand the reasoning.

Well thanks for not posting the PMs I really appreciate it.

Since this topic was directed towards those PMs I'll lock this topic as it's not relevant anymore


Someone's opinion who matters, is someone who posts good thoughts. I think the post I metried broke it down exactly how the situation should be handled.

I probably don't fall into level of opinion you are looking for, but I'll give it a go.


Sorry I must have missed this. Hasn't it been consensus to tag any account sales for years?

That's 2015. It might be a surprise for you personally but it's not news to anyone who's at least a little bit familiar with the account trading situation.


I find it boring how you keep looking for ways to twist mundane situations (like requesting facts vs answering a vague/leading question) into drama that fits your conspiracy theory re "positions of power".

killyou72, I got your PM.  First of all, wherever those quotes were from, it was from 2017.  Second of all, I only see that the member in question may have bought accounts at some point, but he doesn't even say when it was.  I'm not going back years to tag anyone for account sales.  When that consensus was reached that all members ought to be tagged regardless of who it is, it was from that point forward--and that was only a few months ago.  You haven't hit upon any great forum sin here.  It's apparently old news.

Edit:

If I could find the thread, I'd link to it but I don't remember which one it was and have no way of finding out.  Nobody is bound to that anyway.  It was basically a bunch of members agreeing that there should be no mitigating circumstances from then on about people dealing in accounts.  No excuses.  And it was well after 2017, which is when the communique that killyou72 quoted to me happened.

If I told you who the last person that QS just told me buy/sold accounts you wouldn't believe it. Excuse me for thinking they were staff. I thought they were. It's a close a fucking enough


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/delete-me-please-1013494



https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/auction-full-member-with-potential-activity-and-private-keys-1260639


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10484714

I'm still waiting for someone's opinion that matters to post

No offense QS and everyone else

And OG didn't really give an opinion

OP, just say whatever it is you're going to say.  It's annoyingly childish to tease a bunch of people with an implied threat against an apparently very trusted member in the name of not wanting to ruin someone's reputation.  If that was your real concern you wouldn't have even made this thread.

If someone has engaged in account sales recently, it wouldn't matter to me who they were.  I would tag them, as I said I would shortly after that iluvbitcoins mess when we all kind of came to the consensus that people have had fair warning and shouldn't be doing that and not expecting a tag.  So either tell us or lock the thread, please.

It strikes me as odd that you would publicly state that you have proof of this occurring without coming forward with it from the beginning. It just seems like the kind of thing that you don't dance around. If you're aware of account farming and violating the terms of signature campaigns by one of the most respected and trusted users on the forum, then let's get the show on the road.

Being incorrect wouldn't be the end of the world. Your intentions seem to be genuine, but by not directly presenting proof, not mentioning names or giving any context what can you expect to get out of this thread? The chances of retaliation are there, but I believe the cost of silence may be greater. You have the responsibility of choosing between self-benefit (through silence/extortion) and the benefit of the community (through sharing information, allowing "investigation"), if you have the information you claim to. Now that you've made that responsibility public, good luck.

I hate to be a conspiracy theorist, but if you're debating on whether or not to disseminate the information or come to an agreement with this member; I would suggest the former, less you get taken for a ride yourself.


I think your choice of the word "okay" should be reconsidered.


Source?


I'd feel better about the community deciding things like this, rather than killyou72 or any individual withholding this kind of information.


It won't get any better if people are too scared for themselves to come forward with game-changing information.


We're waiting!