Pages:
Author

Topic: Is it possible that bitcoin will become unaffordable to use for micropayments? (Read 14177 times)

legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000
So what might be a good solution to this?  Huh
Technical solutions have been proposed, but not implemented.  See Scalability. Without them, the Bitcoin network maxes out around 7 transactions per second, and lately traffic has bumped against that limit during busy periods. Scaling up requires cooperation from the big mining pools. Higher fees benefit miners. Whether they want to do more work for less money is a big question.

Some people have suggested using unconfirmed Bitcoins for small transactions, but that's a headache. Coinbase only buys "confirmed" Bitcoins. Read their blog as to why. It's not so much a rip-off problem as a problem with downstream transactions getting stuck because there's an unconfirmed input.

Coinbase's business is to provide a way for Bitcoin retailers to accept payment without taking a risk on the price of Bitcoins dropping. Bitcoin dropped 25%-30% today, then partially recovered. If you're a goods retailer with a 15% markup, you don't want to be exposed to a big drop like that. So if Coinbase insists on confirmed coins only, that sort of sets the pattern for Bitcoin retail.
newbie
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
So what might be a good solution to this?  Huh
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000
The transaction fee is 0.001 BTC at MtGox.  It is near the end of the press release.
https://www.mtgox.com/press_release_20131120.html

Then ask MtGox why they are ripping you off charging 20x what is necessary.  Then look at how much they are actually paying.   MtGox ripping customers off is nothing new it also has nothing to do with Bitcoin.
Bitcoin is starting to hit scaling problems. Look at Mt. Gox Bitcoin transactions unconfirmed after 2 hours. 155 in the queue right now, but numbers from 400 to 1000 have been seen. Also look at average transaction confirmation time. During busy periods, it's been spiking up lately. There's now enough transaction volume to temporarily saturate the network. This isn't happening all the time, but it is happening frequently now.  Mt. Gox has been getting complaints about how long it takes to confirm transactions, so they've bumped up their fee to the point that theirs should get through.

Many of the mining pools are only generating 250K blocks as a default. The Bitcoin client can be configured for bigger blocks, but it doesn't have to be. There are negative incentives to miners in making their blocks bigger - their confirmations slow, and there's a risk of an orphan block.   This is slowing confirmations. A bigger fee can get your transaction confirmed sooner.  See https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/blocks-are-not-full-whats-the-plan-339505
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
The transaction fee is 0.001 BTC at MtGox.  It is near the end of the press release.
https://www.mtgox.com/press_release_20131120.html

Then ask MtGox why they are ripping you off charging 20x what is necessary.  Then look at how much they are actually paying.   MtGox ripping customers off is nothing new it also has nothing to do with Bitcoin.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
The transaction fee is 0.001 BTC at MtGox.  It is near the end of the press release.
https://www.mtgox.com/press_release_20131120.html
legendary
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1012
Beyond Imagination
At 0.0005 fee, 2 thousand transactions will make 1 bitcoin for miners each block, and that is approaching the block size limit

Anyway the micro payment is not the main purpose of using bitcoin, the store of value and international transaction are most important. For daily purchase of grocery,  people already have credit card and mobile payment solutions from banks
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
Well, this morning, Mt.Gox informed us that they will require a 0.001 BTC transaction fee to "increase the speed of transactions in the network."
At current prices, that is over a dollar (US).  That's getting expensive.

You sure it wasn't 0.0001.  If it is then it is more like $0.10 not a dollar.  If it isn't then you should ask MtGox why they are charging fees 10x what is required by the network.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Well, this morning, Mt.Gox informed us that they will require a 0.001 BTC transaction fee to "increase the speed of transactions in the network."
At current prices, that is over a dollar (US).  That's getting expensive.
full member
Activity: 195
Merit: 102
DiMS dev team
I am whining about this for some time

Why not use an effectively dead  bitcoin address.An another payment system would originate there. With different rules I don't know what  kind of  properties are needed to enable  dust operation but I think it is feasible. Lost coin for bitcoin network could be  the root of value in this  parallel "world"     
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1003
If there is no rush, then send without any transaction fee. I feel bitcoin wouldn't work for a pay as you read system or alike for online newspapers. The confirmation times are too slow, I want to click and read, it click, wait upto 20minutes them read...

bitpay doesn't wait for a block to confirm your payment why should a newspaper.
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1003
If there is no rush, then send without any transaction fee. I feel bitcoin wouldn't work for a pay as you read system or alike for online newspapers. The confirmation times are too slow, I want to click and read, it click, wait upto 20minutes them read...
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1004
The problem of fees for micro-payments only comes up when you want to send/receive many of them (when even Bitcoin's lowish fees become a burden).

If everyone you are dealing with is sending/receiving very few micro-payments (maybe you own and run some form of online game) then just have them pay the fees.

If many of the people you are dealing with are also sending/receiving many micro-payments (maybe payments for bandwidth on a darknet or for a torrent; something organised but decentralised) then you could use probabilistic payments to reduce your fees down to the cost of sending/receiving a few packets of data to/from a peer.  Probabilistic payments have the drawback of variance but this will be drowned out by the volume of payments you expect to make.
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
Highly unlikely I would think but must confess that I would also like a comment on this from somebody more knowledgeable

Good concern to have
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Campaign for 0.000001 fee for bitcoin.

I can already +1  and +1 again (me, myself and I)

G:)
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM
Yeah how to get a blockchain.info/MyWallet to permanently stay in GBP  Huh

Now, that one, I don't know. However, this guy might: [email protected]

Other contact info (including a UK phone number) here.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1003
I think bitcoin would be better off with a very low price but a very high value.  Moving the decimal place would help that.

Settings > Options > Display > Unit to show amounts in > µBTC

Problem solved.

I don't use the default bitcoin wallet and neither will new adopters or the masses.  Calling them micro/milliBitcoins and working in different values requires more effort and thought for new adopters.  Just having a single simple unit that is easy to correlate with the $/€/£ would be simpler and ease adoption plus use.   

We do have a single simple unit that is easy to correlate with the $/€/£. it is the BTC.
Currently the exchange rates are:
1BTC =
1BTC =
1BTC =

Tell me what wallet application you use, and I may be able to provide the steps necessary to achieve your goal in your application.

Yeah how to get a blockchain.info/MyWallet to permanently stay in GBP  Huh
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM
I think bitcoin would be better off with a very low price but a very high value.  Moving the decimal place would help that.

Settings > Options > Display > Unit to show amounts in > µBTC

Problem solved.

I don't use the default bitcoin wallet and neither will new adopters or the masses.  Calling them micro/milliBitcoins and working in different values requires more effort and thought for new adopters.  Just having a single simple unit that is easy to correlate with the $/€/£ would be simpler and ease adoption plus use.   

We do have a single simple unit that is easy to correlate with the $/€/£. it is the BTC.
Currently the exchange rates are:
1BTC =
1BTC =
1BTC =

Tell me what wallet application you use, and I may be able to provide the steps necessary to achieve your goal in your application.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1003
I think bitcoin would be better off with a very low price but a very high value.  Moving the decimal place would help that.

Settings > Options > Display > Unit to show amounts in > µBTC

Problem solved.

I don't use the default bitcoin wallet and neither will new adopters or the masses.  Calling them micro/milliBitcoins and working in different values requires more effort and thought for new adopters.  Just having a single simple unit that is easy to correlate with the $/€/£ would be simpler and ease adoption plus use.   
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
0xFB0D8D1534241423
I think bitcoin would be better off with a very low price but a very high value.  Moving the decimal place would help that.

Settings > Options > Display > Unit to show amounts in > µBTC

Problem solved.

Exactly  Bitcoin does have a very low price:  ~$0.1 per mBTC and there will be a high number of units ~21 billion mBTC.   
I think you're missing a 0, good sir.
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
I think bitcoin would be better off with a very low price but a very high value.  Moving the decimal place would help that.

Settings > Options > Display > Unit to show amounts in > µBTC

Problem solved.

Exactly  Bitcoin does have a very low price:  ~$0.01 per mBTC and there will be a high number of units ~21 billion mBTC.    
Pages:
Jump to: