Pages:
Author

Topic: Is it true that 90% of current Bitcoins are owned by 50 people? (Read 1775 times)

legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000
Si vis pacem, para bellum
List in inaccurate.. plus you don't think transactions and wallet splits like this aren't common? Such as these..  First address has 20,000 bitcoins split between 200 different addresses with 100 bitcoin in each... the second address recently split off into the third and placed 5000 bitcoin between a number of wallets.

16Zr93wygt7LZ7banf8B7dz3xZkVyFU5RR
1JFxZ3Z5is5ecLQSZwrVzjQiGkg5rBWivw
1CTU2o7QcX3ETqwDXownynNxhx3oxjvewy

i never said the list was up to date and accurate
i dont even know who compliled it

but if it were ever true it would reflect  that a vast amount of BTC wealth is controlled by a  not too large minority of persons in the community
full member
Activity: 189
Merit: 100
Hello
List in inaccurate.. plus you don't think transactions and wallet splits like this aren't common? Such as these..  First address has 20,000 bitcoins split between 200 different addresses with 100 bitcoin in each... the second address recently split off into the third and placed 5000 bitcoin between a number of wallets.

16Zr93wygt7LZ7banf8B7dz3xZkVyFU5RR
1JFxZ3Z5is5ecLQSZwrVzjQiGkg5rBWivw
1CTU2o7QcX3ETqwDXownynNxhx3oxjvewy
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
Drunk Posts

Remember that its possible quite a few of those addresses may have been lost.

you can see the date the top 50+ richest addresses were last accesed
 (most  or almost all of them within this month,many just yesterday or even today )

That date is the last received, anyone can send a tiny amount to those addresses. The last spent date is far more useful.
member
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
As soon as there is any protracted period  of price stability, all the speculative capital gets withdrawn and goes in search in a new bubble
Are we talking about the same bitcoin? Last time I checked every longer period of stability ended in massive (~20x) rally.

In which case it isn't stability is it?
How about spring 2012? For two months rate was ~5.1 it was eternity in bitcoin time there were people trying to get excited when rate moved 0.03$ (0.006%) that's less volatility in BTC/USD than it is normal between fiat currencies.
I see that you registered 11 April, something tells me you must be very butthurt.
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000
Si vis pacem, para bellum

Remember that its possible quite a few of those addresses may have been lost.

you can see the date the top 50+ richest addresses were last accesed
 (most  or almost all of them within this month,many just yesterday or even today )
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
As soon as there is any protracted period  of price stability, all the speculative capital gets withdrawn and goes in search in a new bubble
Are we talking about the same bitcoin? Last time I checked every longer period of stability ended in massive (~20x) rally.

In which case it isn't stability is it?
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500

Just take a look at this thread
Im pretty sure that the guy at silkroad owns around 1 third of all btc

You mean the FBI guy?
member
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
As soon as there is any protracted period  of price stability, all the speculative capital gets withdrawn and goes in search in a new bubble
Are we talking about the same bitcoin? Last time I checked every longer period of stability ended in massive (~20x) rally.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10

Just take a look at this thread
Im pretty sure that the guy at silkroad owns around 1 third of all btc
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1004
It's tough to ID the addresses. On one side, people can obviously control more than one address. On the other, a lot of the big addresses are likely businesses that hold funds for lots of customers; case in point: that ~195,000 BTC transaction the other day is thought to be Bitstamp....so that single address, one of the biggest, really belongs to thousands of people.
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
I read this somewhere but the claim was not sourced. Is it true? If not, what's the actually distribution like amongst top 50 holders?

Whether it is true or not, due to increasing computational demands of mining the lionshare of the next 11 million will be mined, and possibly held by large scale corporate or even governmental (China i am thinking off) run operations.

sr. member
Activity: 429
Merit: 250
Pythagoras and Plato are my brothers.
I read this somewhere but the claim was not sourced. Is it true? If not, what's the actually distribution like amongst top 50 holders?

Satoshi alone owns million+ coins, but he hasn´t touched his wallet since 2010. Those coins could be lost for all we know.

That alone is surely a roadblock in terms of Bitcoin ever becoming anything like the ubiquitous store of value and medium of exchange its fans hope? If those coins were ever dumped, Bitcoin would be back down to a fraction of a cent.


Please let it happen! It would be race who adds USD to exchanges sonner to have extremly cheap bitcoins! Soon the price woud be back  Wink
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 506
I read this somewhere but the claim was not sourced. Is it true? If not, what's the actually distribution like amongst top 50 holders?

Satoshi alone owns million+ coins, but he hasn´t touched his wallet since 2010. Those coins could be lost for all we know.

I don't think its likely for satoshi to lost his bitcoins.  Tongue

I can spell it out for you. He could be dead, thus billion+ dollars are just lying there like some mythical treasure straight out of Tolkien.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
I read this somewhere but the claim was not sourced. Is it true? If not, what's the actually distribution like amongst top 50 holders?

Satoshi alone owns million+ coins, but he hasn´t touched his wallet since 2010. Those coins could be lost for all we know.

I don't think its likely for satoshi to lost his bitcoins.  Tongue
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
I read this somewhere but the claim was not sourced. Is it true? If not, what's the actually distribution like amongst top 50 holders?

Satoshi alone owns million+ coins, but he hasn´t touched his wallet since 2010. Those coins could be lost for all we know.

That alone is surely a roadblock in terms of Bitcoin ever becoming anything like the ubiquitous store of value and medium of exchange its fans hope? If those coins were ever dumped, Bitcoin would be back down to a fraction of a cent.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 506
I read this somewhere but the claim was not sourced. Is it true? If not, what's the actually distribution like amongst top 50 holders?

Satoshi alone owns million+ coins, but he hasn´t touched his wallet since 2010. Those coins could be lost for all we know.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
At one point it was true. I suggest taking a look at this thread:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/distribution-of-bitcoin-wealth-by-owner-316297
However, as the value of BTC increases, the large holders are incited to diversify their investment (usually via USD), so the distribution gets more even with time.

Assuming they can continue to find greater fools.

It could be said that Bitcoin will either continually increases in value, or collapse to nothing. As soon as there is any protracted period  of price stability, all the speculative capital gets withdrawn and goes in search in a new bubble (Litecoin perhaps). The only way to prevent that is an ever increasing price, but that's not sustainable, especially as Bitcoin is not making much progress in terms of merchant acceptance.  
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
Drunk Posts

Remember that its possible quite a few of those addresses may have been lost.
full member
Activity: 160
Merit: 101
At one point it was true. I suggest taking a look at this thread:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/distribution-of-bitcoin-wealth-by-owner-316297
However, as the value of BTC increases, the large holders are incited to diversify their investment (usually via USD), so the distribution gets more even with time.
full member
Activity: 160
Merit: 101
Pages:
Jump to: