Topic: IS JOINING BOUNTY MORE PROFITABLE THAN JOINING AN ICO? - page 2. (Read 479 times)
These are 2 different things.. joining bounty is "free" even if you have to do a lot of work, but you can partecipate without invest any money, but there are many ICO that don't have a bounty and that are very profitable.... if you have time to choose the right ICO and you have to invest some money, then do both !
You need to invest in ICO and there are no guarantees that these investments will be profitable for you. In bounty campaigns you do not lose anything.
Depends on the amount of investing, mostly the ICO is much profitable than bounty. Some people are mixing that two ways but you got to be sure that the project is going to have a bright future otherwise you're done.
Its more profitable in joining bounty since its only comsume our time and not money, unlike in participating ICO it needs investment and there's no guarantee that ICO will succeed and some of ICOs turned into scam ICO's.
This depends on the ICO you are talking about but in general, If an ICO has a lot of bounty hunters, there's no point working on bounty. If it reaches that point, the ICO is probably good and hence a good investment. Ive seen ICOs that didnt have enough publicity but had a lot of potential in them, the bounty hunters capitalized on them and made some quick bucks. Most hunters exchange as soon the coin hits the market. In such cases, bounty is better than the ICO itself but in the first case ICO is better.
It is a good deal to do bounty instead since you will not need to invest something but your time. This is a good start for newbies since you only need to invest your time and you will gain some token in return and at the same time you will grow your knowledge about crypto which is necessary when you join ICO's. Once you feel that you can already handle ICO and is ready to take a risk, then go since this will really give you a better reward.
There is a big difference between the two which is bounty and the joining the ico. If you don't have money yet go for the bounty, because in bounty you should work first before you earn profit, but in joining the ico you should invest only your money to make profit and it depends how much you invest the more much better.
It depends. I do both. You can't join multiple signature campaigns which usually has decent allocation in bounty. Other campaigns like social media aren't that good paying. If you have funds and trust a project, then the best option is investing in ICO. Some good ICO tokens have multiplied after being listed on exchanges. ICO tokens even do 10x in a month of being listed. So, I won't say doing a bounty is more profitable. Yes, it can be an option to earn some tokens.
There is a problem with ICOs who give out too much prize for bountys, their price drops a lot before and when they join an exchange because bounty hunters are never interested in projects, and they dont want to hold the tokens, they just want to sell it fast and withdraw profits
It depends on the ICO that you have participated because sometimes being a bounty hunter is hard due to changing of rules on the campaign.
I spend most of my time now in bounty hunting of tokens, which is for me, a good way to earn more money in crypto world. But I've noticed that there was this ICO that i didn't join because they don't offer bounty campaign which is their ico token price was so less. And when this ico goes live on the exchange. The price of that token gains 10x of its ICO value! Thats why i think to myself, is bounty hunting more profitable than joining the ico? Can anyone help me out.
The price might got x10 BUT that comes with your initial investment. While doing bounty is getting some tokens for free which you decide whether you want to dump or wait for x10. If you got your profits from bounty, you can consider investing on ICO, some had KYC so be prepared for that. In anyways, you are still earning so Congrats.
Bounty is more profitable as you don't spend money so everything you get is profit. Investing in ICO will sometimes gives you profit but it depends as some take time to be appreciated in value.
I spend most of my time now in bounty hunting of tokens, which is for me, a good way to earn more money in crypto world. But I've noticed that there was this ICO that i didn't join because they don't offer bounty campaign which is their ico token price was so less. And when this ico goes live on the exchange. The price of that token gains 10x of its ICO value! Thats why i think to myself, is bounty hunting more profitable than joining the ico? Can anyone help me out.
With bounties you are at least guaranteed not to lose anything, so if you are fine with making a little money bounties are the way and if you hold, you may even get rich just out of a bounty, however improbable.
In my opinion if you are not sure about a project and it offers a bounty program, just go for the bounty and stay out of the ICO. However if you find a project that you think has a lot of potential then go for the ICO and for the bounty as well of course
Good question. I'm going to find the answer to that myself shortly.
I used to think dumping $5k into an ICO was a good investment. Then I saw some Bounty Hunters get more than that in tokens, and then they cashed out caused the prices to dump down to $2k. Well, since that's the case perhaps bounties are better.
I used to think dumping $5k into an ICO was a good investment. Then I saw some Bounty Hunters get more than that in tokens, and then they cashed out caused the prices to dump down to $2k. Well, since that's the case perhaps bounties are better.
Well, in bounty you only spend your time
(Time is money? well, not for everybody) That said, the 2 things are not alternative! I mean, you can both invest money and time in a project. In this case, you receive some extra tokens and edge the total risk
Haha.. not for everybody.. I like that. Yeah I honestly have nothing better to do all day so why not do this. Free lotto tickets as far as I'm concerned.
You have a stupid question. Your bounty participation is limited to your account rank, signature, social media and blog participations. You can invest as much as you can. How could you compare these two? Bounties make you spend your time to produce something for the advertisement of the project. Investment as put your money in project you trust is not comparable action to bounty participation. If you know good ICO you should invest on it.
I like you, every day I spend a lot of time on the bounty thread, but I will still attend the ICO the raise of the project, because if you like a project, then holding after a period of time will have a very good income.
I spend most of my time now in bounty hunting of tokens, which is for me, a good way to earn more money in crypto world. But I've noticed that there was this ICO that i didn't join because they don't offer bounty campaign which is their ico token price was so less. And when this ico goes live on the exchange. The price of that token gains 10x of its ICO value! Thats why i think to myself, is bounty hunting more profitable than joining the ico? Can anyone help me out.
If you have available money to invest and you are ready for the risk then invest. The good thing about bounty you will not lose any money you just need to advertise thier projectt then they will pay you for the work youve done for them. And both of them is profitable. 
Good question. I'm going to find the answer to that myself shortly.
I used to think dumping $5k into an ICO was a good investment. Then I saw some Bounty Hunters get more than that in tokens, and then they cashed out caused the prices to dump down to $2k. Well, since that's the case perhaps bounties are better.
I used to think dumping $5k into an ICO was a good investment. Then I saw some Bounty Hunters get more than that in tokens, and then they cashed out caused the prices to dump down to $2k. Well, since that's the case perhaps bounties are better.
Well, in bounty you only spend your time
(Time is money? well, not for everybody) That said, the 2 things are not alternative! I mean, you can both invest money and time in a project. In this case, you receive some extra tokens and edge the total risk
Good question. I'm going to find the answer to that myself shortly.
I used to think dumping $5k into an ICO was a good investment. Then I saw some Bounty Hunters get more than that in tokens, and then they cashed out caused the prices to dump down to $2k. Well, since that's the case perhaps bounties are better.
I used to think dumping $5k into an ICO was a good investment. Then I saw some Bounty Hunters get more than that in tokens, and then they cashed out caused the prices to dump down to $2k. Well, since that's the case perhaps bounties are better.
Not all good projects have company bounties. This is the first plus in favor of ICO. You have only one opportunity to participate in the company Signature (not two and not three), and for this month or 2 month of participation there can be 5 good and promising ICOs. For participating in the bounty, you can get only a limited number of tokens, while you can buy any quantity on the ICO.
Jump to: