Pages:
Author

Topic: Is justice really blind? (Read 496 times)

member
Activity: 966
Merit: 14
Tontogether | Save Smart & Win Big
February 05, 2024, 11:39:06 PM
#67
To answer your question, I do not know about other countries Justice system, but in my country, Justice is not blind. It favors the rich and mighty. Matter of fact there are some people in my society who are considered 'sacred cows'. They commit crimes with impunity and go scot-free, even when the get arrested and charged to court, sooner than later they get bail and drag that case for years, until you eventually forget about that case. Sometimes it seems the laws are made to punish only the poor.

Well it is the country where corruption is worshipped. Such countries where the justice system is bought by those who have deep pockets, then they are just going to be in circles and no progress will be made. The justice system is the correctional system of the country or facility that every person should be under both the mighty and the weak . If this is not done that even the highest office holders does not obey the law then the country is doomed. Take away law and its enforcement then that country becomes lawless and retrogressive.

The court used to be the hope of the common man, but in my country, that is no more the case.
They forget that what differentiates humans from animals is law and order. Without law and order, we ain't different from animals.
Justice is now for the highest bidder, and this is making some people rather take laws into their hands by involving in jungle justice, because they know that the justice system is nothing to write home about.
full member
Activity: 581
Merit: 104
Chainjoes.com
February 05, 2024, 09:47:34 AM
#66
The question is, is it right for someone to be punished twice for one and the same crime? I think the answer is no.
that's why i told that, I'll consider her during punishment. Otherwise if same situation repeat in future in other case, then a person will get open license for killing someone in real cause he/she knows that, he/she won't get punished twice. So thus want to stop crime and will announce compensation for them who serve in jail with false accusement and will try not to repeat such cases

Quote
Therefore, would you now come back again to punish the woman after she was out of jail to put her back in there?, because you want to wade off other potential committals. The law is not made for a single person but for the whole of the people in the jurisdiction.
there Will be two point.
1. Other person judge her and i found the case for first time. both judges weren't same.
2. I'm the judge for her 1st judgement and she again come before me after get rearrested. (Can be happened co-incidently)

But here op ask me to judge the case. That means that woman should have to come to me again (normally or coincidently), right? Otherwise how can i judge her when I'll be busy to judge others people? That's the facts
member
Activity: 168
Merit: 22
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest
February 05, 2024, 04:25:53 AM
#65
    Friends let's do small judiciary work and legal advice this morning. A woman was accused of killing her husband, his body was never found and she was sentenced. Years after serving her jail term, she found out the man is living with another woman.

   She went and shot the man several times and he died for real this time around and she was re-arrested for the same murder on the same person.

As a judge what will you do ?
will you address the case as a fresh murder or will you consider it as a crime she already served the term? 
                         
 lawyers, your opinion is needed. Over to you

The case here is two sided sentence of the crime has already been served, which she did through alledge without concrete evidence. Now she has opponent sharing the man, before any judgement I will first Carry out some search to know if she is truly responsible for the same crime. But if she did, she is guilty certain laws need come in because she guilty reason being she take laws into her hand. But the sentence to jail will be reduced because this is a case of provocation.
hero member
Activity: 2450
Merit: 616
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
February 05, 2024, 03:15:52 AM
#64
To answer your question, I do not know about other countries Justice system, but in my country, Justice is not blind. It favors the rich and mighty. Matter of fact there are some people in my society who are considered 'sacred cows'. They commit crimes with impunity and go scot-free, even when the get arrested and charged to court, sooner than later they get bail and drag that case for years, until you eventually forget about that case. Sometimes it seems the laws are made to punish only the poor.

Well it is the country where corruption is worshipped. Such countries where the justice system is bought by those who have deep pockets, then they are just going to be in circles and no progress will be made. The justice system is the correctional system of the country or facility that every person should be under both the mighty and the weak . If this is not done that even the highest office holders does not obey the law then the country is doomed. Take away law and its enforcement then that country becomes lawless and retrogressive.
member
Activity: 966
Merit: 14
Tontogether | Save Smart & Win Big
February 04, 2024, 11:57:35 PM
#63
To answer your question, I do not know about other countries Justice system, but in my country, Justice is not blind. It favors the rich and mighty. Matter of fact there are some people in my society who are considered 'sacred cows'. They commit crimes with impunity and go scot-free, even when the get arrested and charged to court, sooner than later they get bail and drag that case for years, until you eventually forget about that case. Sometimes it seems the laws are made to punish only the poor.
full member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 118
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
February 04, 2024, 02:15:27 PM
#62
Quote from: Victan22
As a judge what will you do ?
will you address the case as a fresh murder or will you consider it as a crime she already served the term? 
                         
 lawyers, your opinion is needed. Over to you
I will consider the case as a concluded case because the woman have already served her tem in the prison to fulfill the law of the land and, I will award some dollars for her for do the right thing to kill her husband to let the justice of the land not to experience shame. Never you think justice is blind despite the judge didn't rule the case for your favor because, the Judges in Court so much depend so much trust on the evidence the two parties brought to court which are some of the tools the judges use to answer cases in the court of law.
member
Activity: 223
Merit: 37
hallo world ^_^
February 04, 2024, 01:53:02 PM
#61
Is justice really  blind?
I don't know about other countries, but in our country the law is not blind, it can see who pays more, who has a case, an important person and which official he belongs to. everything is guaranteed by law they will pass. I hope the laws in our country are as strong and their implementation as good as in Europe.

Quote
    Friends let's do small judiciary work and legal advice this morning. A woman was accused of killing her husband....~~snip~~
Regarding the context of this woman, according to our country's criminal law, she will go to prison again and be charged with premeditated murder, I don't know the international name, but the punishment is execution or life imprisonment. but if you are a state official or have money, you can discuss the punishment lol.

Quote
As a judge what will you do ?
will you address the case as a fresh murder or will you consider it as a crime she already served the term?
it was a new murder, I would have charged the woman with murder or premeditated murder if it had not been spontaneous. and sentenced she to 20 years in prison under our country's criminal code. because there is legal relief, if not the death penalty or life imprisonment.
member
Activity: 117
Merit: 11
https://peachbitcoin.com/
February 04, 2024, 12:31:45 PM
#60
    Friends let's do small judiciary work and legal advice this morning. A woman was accused of killing her husband, his body was never found and she was sentenced. Years after serving her jail term, she found out the man is living with another woman.

   She went and shot the man several times and he died for real this time around and she was re-arrested for the same murder on the same person.

As a judge what will you do ?
will you address the case as a fresh murder or will you consider it as a crime she already served the term? 
                         
 lawyers, your opinion is needed. Over to you

I am no lawyer, but I think the Judge should set her free. She already served her term in jail for the same crime. This comes under Double jeopardy. You can read further by following the given links.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/double_jeopardy
http://fra.europa.eu/en/eu-charter/article/50-right-not-be-tried-or-punished-twice-criminal-proceedings-same-criminal
hero member
Activity: 2450
Merit: 616
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
February 04, 2024, 12:29:18 PM
#59
But if i were a judge, as i already declared that woman gulity and that's why she already served her jail term, then I'll consider her punishment after she rearrested. Maybe some years of jail! I would punish her again, otherwise other people would do same crime when they would notice a judge release a real criminal without any punishment

Lol but as a judge you have to make judgement that is not repugnant to natural justice and ultra vires. Despite being a judge, you still have to fall back to the books of law guiding humanity and your jurisdiction.

The question is, is it right for someone to be punished twice for one and the same crime? I think the answer is no. Therefore, would you now come back again to punish the woman after she was out of jail to put her back in there?, because you want to wade off other potential committals. The law is not made for a single person but for the whole of the people in the jurisdiction.
full member
Activity: 581
Merit: 104
Chainjoes.com
February 04, 2024, 12:04:22 PM
#58
It seems interesting along with weird case. Firstly, judge shouldn't have given his judgement without any solid evidence. Don't know how a judge can punish a person base on ideas or guesses. Besides I don't have knowledge what should a judge do according to law. But if i were a judge, as i already declared that woman gulity and that's why she already served her jail term, then I'll consider her punishment after she rearrested. Maybe some years of jail! I would punish her again, otherwise other people would do same crime when they would notice a judge release a real criminal without any punishment
sr. member
Activity: 1582
Merit: 280
Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!
February 04, 2024, 07:40:10 AM
#57
As a judge what will you do ?
will you address the case as a fresh murder or will you consider it as a crime she already served the term? 
                         
 lawyers, your opinion is needed. Over to you

As a judge, you have to do the right thing, which is arresting and sentencing the woman to jail. As the judge I may be considerate as per her previous sentence and reduce the time a little but she must be put to jail because even if she was first wrongly sentenced, she went on and committed a crime (the crime). Two wrongs don’t make a right. So, fresh case for me.
full member
Activity: 378
Merit: 182
Play Bitcoin PVP Prediction Game
February 01, 2024, 09:28:20 AM
#56
    Friends let's do small judiciary work and legal advice this morning. A woman was accused of killing her husband, his body was never found and she was sentenced. Years after serving her jail term, she found out the man is living with another woman.

   She went and shot the man several times and he died for real this time around and she was re-arrested for the same murder on the same person.

As a judge what will you do ?
will you address the case as a fresh murder or will you consider it as a crime she already served the term? 
                         
 lawyers, your opinion is needed. Over to you

OP, this sound like a fiction to me, how can can a competent court of jurisdiction sentence someone without a good evidence, the corpse was not seen, so what's the evidence of their claim that the woman in question committed the crime, I don't think that such is obtainable anywhere.
The woman having knowledge that the man is living with another woman else where and deciding to go their to shoot him severally, to me am not an attorney but crime is crime, no matter the emotion involve, since you commit a crime you will go in for it, this is my take on this matte.
jr. member
Activity: 112
Merit: 4
January 22, 2024, 11:46:41 AM
#55
Nothing, is worth taking the life  of another. No matter the misdeed, immorality wickedness and sin committed against one,. To me she had an opportunity to justify her self from the previous one and justice would have caught up with him. But repeating the same crime that she  was convicted for is not good for her  she could have prosecuted him and the authorities for not properly investigating into the case before conclusion. But if her lawyers are good, she can get reduced sentence.

Justice is not blind, rather it can be compromised by the Elite, those in power and authority.
full member
Activity: 448
Merit: 146
January 21, 2024, 05:55:36 PM
#54
   Friends let's do small judiciary work and legal advice this morning. A woman was accused of killing her husband, his body was never found and she was sentenced. Years after serving her jail term, she found out the man is living with another woman.

   She went and shot the man several times and he died for real this time around and she was re-arrested for the same murder on the same person.

As a judge what will you do ?
will you address the case as a fresh murder or will you consider it as a crime she already served the term?  
                        
 lawyers, your opinion is needed. Over to you
The first question to this case is that, if she was wrongly accused for killing the man and she has served her jail term and come back, and it was later found out that the man was not dead, it then means she will be compensated by the judicial authority or the government for wrong accusation and haven't serve a jail term she's not supposed to, however if that case is settled on the compensation side on wrong accusation, then another case is going to be opened on the fact that the man wasn't dead and she went ahead in killing the man in real time, it is a fresh case all together, because it is believed that the first case has been settled and compensations have been made.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 195
January 20, 2024, 04:19:31 AM
#53
Justice isn't blind, we are the ones that e refused to apply it where appropriately needed, you can't expect people doing wrongs and yet they are expecting things to work out for them as being vindicated, we cannot blame some people for what they ha e done if not that we were once in that same shoe, the woman was firstly accused but later proved it that they were right of what she has been accused of.
It will be much better putting oneself in same shoes of the lady, who knows how long she might have served for something which she did not do. If i should say the man deserves putting a hole on his head then it makes me look like I'm in support of the woman but the man fucked up full time. You mean he never knew the woman was in prison as being accused of killing him, in a little way he deserves to be punished but maybe not with death sentence as what the woman did, she allowed her anger took over her. So, I think she will serve as per committing the crime, if at all she did not kill him then she would have been compasated for the time spent in prison.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 538
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
January 19, 2024, 10:05:06 AM
#52
Justice isn't blind, we are the ones that e refused to apply it where appropriately needed, you can't expect people doing wrongs and yet they are expecting things to work out for them as being vindicated, we cannot blame some people for what they ha e done if not that we were once in that same shoe, the woman was firstly accused but later proved it that they were right of what she has been accused of.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 120
Cashback 15%
January 19, 2024, 09:56:35 AM
#51
    Friends let's do small judiciary work and legal advice this morning. A woman was accused of killing her husband, his body was never found and she was sentenced. Years after serving her jail term, she found out the man is living with another woman.

   She went and shot the man several times and he died for real this time around and she was re-arrested for the same murder on the same person.

As a judge what will you do ?
will you address the case as a fresh murder or will you consider it as a crime she already served the term? 
                         
 lawyers, your opinion is needed. Over to you
If this story is real and the lady got arrested without any evidence shows there's something fishy, it can be as a form of conspiracy and who knows if the judge took a bribe.
In a situations like this the judge should be held responsible for any action the lady took and the judge should answer some certain questions concerning the first case, if this case appeared to be real the lawyer who took the case against the lady should be questioned too, I believe there's some behind this story but since things are done hidden no one can question. I will go with the opinion for a rearrest cause in our society we should not fight with our power but rather always report to the law officials, have seen several situations when people get arrested for what they no know about just because they made a bad decision and acted  according to their will, in this situation the lady had a second chance to prove her guiltiness but she used her power to fight back so she should be arrested.
hero member
Activity: 2450
Merit: 616
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
January 19, 2024, 03:46:39 AM
#50

The time she spent in the jail for not committing the crime she was accused of would have been a reason for her not to commit a crime because this time it will be heavy on her because their is evidence to prove that the crime was committed. I think before she was accused af first it seems people already know this is a crime that she can committ. This time around she will serve the judgment for committing crime, and judgment won't compromise because she was innocent in the first accusation.

It is not enough to assume and believe that the woman is capable of committing the crime or that people are thinking that way. She could be a prime suspect either because she is not in good terms with the husband and usually prime suspects are usually traced in such way where they are perceived as enemy and so you can also see that the assumption is wrong in the first instance where this woman was adjudged to be the committal of the murder until she had to do the real offense, so I don't think she will be imprisoned for the second time since she committed an offence once.
full member
Activity: 560
Merit: 161
January 18, 2024, 12:15:51 PM
#49
In America, you can't be tried for the same crime twice.

Cool

In fact, the rules of some countries are very strict, that is, they follow their rules in such a way that even the citizens of their own country cannot imagine any mistake and the people of foreign countries are limited to itself they can't do it,they don't even give anyone a chance to make a mistake, that is, their rules and regulations are going in the right direction on such a wide scale.

There are such countries where no body can twice a mistake or repeat, they also provide a lot of security to their citizens and what is more, there is a lot of facilities
The time she spent in the jail for not committing the crime she was accused of would have been a reason for her not to commit a crime because this time it will be heavy on her because their is evidence to prove that the crime was committed. I think before she was accused af first it seems people already know this is a crime that she can committ. This time around she will serve the judgment for committing crime, and judgment won't compromise because she was innocent in the first accusation.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 538
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
January 17, 2024, 02:53:53 PM
#48
    Friends let's do small judiciary work and legal advice this morning. A woman was accused of killing her husband, his body was never found and she was sentenced. Years after serving her jail term, she found out the man is living with another woman.

   She went and shot the man several times and he died for real this time around and she was re-arrested for the same murder on the same person.

As a judge what will you do ?
will you address the case as a fresh murder or will you consider it as a crime she already served the term? 
                         
 lawyers, your opinion is needed. Over to you

The first situation was the the judge that made the first court case was unfair, he wouldn't have done that without having any evidence against the the woman for the man's obituary, secondly, the woman has an unforgiven spirit, she would have left the man alone after discovering that he's alive, what should have been done is to sue the man and the judge back to court, then killing the man was the greatest offense of it all, because this time, she can't escape it neither.
Pages:
Jump to: