Topic: Is justice really blind? - page 2. (Read 561 times)

In fact, the rules of some countries are very strict, that is, they follow their rules in such a way that even the citizens of their own country cannot imagine any mistake and the people of foreign countries are limited to itself they can't do it,they don't even give anyone a chance to make a mistake, that is, their rules and regulations are going in the right direction on such a wide scale.

There are such countries where no body can twice a mistake or repeat, they also provide a lot of security to their citizens and what is more, there is a lot of facilities

Actually, justice is not blind, because justice is what we have to do on the basis of evidence. They judge what they have, that is, how do we judge them? We judge them on the basis of evidence.

If someone has committed a crime, we have the evidence against him, then we can punish him according to what he has, but it is wrong to say that justice is blind, blind only on this basis of no availability of proof. But justice is given to the one with evidence.

I think I understand a little bit of the angle that you are going to, probably that she was mentally derailed at the time she shot the husband but to that effect, they will examine her on her mental health before the shooting, at the time of shooting and would put her on close examination to assertain if she is okay or not and most likely they would find out she is fine.

But I think that the lawyers would just plead that she has been jailed for the same offense and she has served it out. I don't think it be out of reason to plead that.

Let me tell you this vividly, there are some cases we may not just be the perfect solution provider to it because we are not there to witness the whole show, but there's a way we could use a spychology kind of approach on that, that is when the professionalism of a thing comes in here, whereby we make engagement of the use of the trained professionals in such field to assist judge the actual matter.

lawyers can use her mental health to get her a good deal
coz living with (- he husband disappereance and geting acused to murder him not knowing if is actually dead or not - Finding out he was cheating on her and living with an other woman ) can really get ur mental health down

Mostly this happens in some corrupt countries where people without connections are considered nothing in the eyes of the government and once they are proven not to have anything to defend their cases, they will automatically face the consequences. In our country, many people have become victims of this kind of behavior by policemen, when they want to be promoted, they will simply choose random guys and arrest them, putting them in a situation where they cannot ask for any help. That's why all around the world, people are losing interest in trusting the police because many of them are still unfair.

It’s almost impossible for someone to be found guilty of murder without finding the body but if with enough circumstantial evidence then the defendant could be found guilty

I’m not a lawyer nor i know anything much about the law but there’s a lot of cases where defendants are falsely accused yet they still serve time even if the crime wasn’t really done but this time around, it is clear that she had killed him so she will serve again but maybe with a lesser sentence

I'm not a lawyer, neither I'm i a law enforcement officer, but from a layman's perspective I know that we should not take laws into our hands, because there must be a punishment for every law that is broken. I guess that it is quite understandable why she had to take the law into her hands and murdered the husband, because the man probably intentionally absconded and must know about the trials of his wife and her imprisonment. So the wife must have felt that he's better off dead, since she has served time for his death.

She should have sued the government and her husband, maybe get a good good lawyer and claim heavy damages.

First the court have no right to jail her for years when their no evidence to prove if she really kid the man. It is so painful going through a punishment which you never committed. The woman who later killed the man just because of the punishment she  went through will be blamed this time around, it doesn't mean because she was innocent at first this time around she will go unpunished,  she will serve for the sin she committed this time .

Trying to murder her husband and failing in the process is as bad as murdering him, but if she never really tried to murder him and was falsely accused, then she probably doesn't deserve the prison sentence she was given for murder. If she does not deserve the sentence she served but ended up committing a crime (murder) that attracts thesame  sentence, she should still be given a fresh/thesame sentence due to the fact that murdering her husband later (or the fact she can murder her husband) is enough proof she actually deserves the first sentence. But since she already served it, an additional sentence could be given on the fact she is capable of murder which is as bad as murder itself. People are better off having her in isolation to keep the rest of the society safe from her (until she is completely reformed for good) than letting her roam about freely.

She would only deserve compensation or justice for being falsely accused of murdering her husband if after regaining her freedom they later realized she was fully innocent or never commited such crime.
You are nolonger innocent once you have become guilty of the crime you were falsely accused of. Your past innocence will no longer be counted/remembered. And it means you actually deserved the first sentence you were given in innocence. This should help people understand that anyone that is capable of committing such crime doesn't really deserve to be called innocent. The evil  was either in her growing or it was expressed in other ways like in words,thoughts etc. It's possible to murder with your words, and ofcourse thoughts

Legally you can't be sentenced twice for the same crime in most part of the world and in some extreme cases if someone was wrongfully committed for a robbery or something and done his time in prison and then found not guilty may attempt the crime and can go without any jail period.

She has already served since her punishment can not be undone. If proper investigation was carried it out. It would have help to show her innocence.
The murder was once, therefore she will serve the punishment once.
However the cause of the husband being away is also wicked and barbaric. If it had been away due to job or other conderable motives it would have been accepted. It is obvious that she was pain because while she was suffering her jail term, the man was busy enjoying himself.

That should be the simple justice on the matter. Justice is not blind if the matter is judged this way but it will be injustice if she is sent to jail for the second time while she actually committed the crime once. Such case should be handled with care as that is same person and not a different person. The earlier judgement was wrong against the alleged offender.

I don't really know where the body of the man went at first but this is a serious crime.She was charged for a crime she didn't commit and she went to jail for the number of years given to her.Now she's out and found out that the suppose dead man isn't really dead and she made it happen for real (that's a recap).

If I'm to be the judge I'd address the case as a fresh case and I'll let everyone know the true storyline and I can't sentence her for a crime she didn't comit at first which she served and now she went on to commit that same crime, I'll set her free with conviction after all she's innocent.

Sometimes justice can be blind but not always.

Actually,  justice ain't blind,  not in this world we live in.  We shouldn't be delusional enough to believe that the court is the last hope of the common man.

But in this instance,  the woman committed a crime.  If she has the right lawyers she might have gone free or with minimal sentence,  hence justice is not blind. 
So it just depend on how good your lawyers are.

Is justice really  blind?


Justice is not at all blind... not in the tiny bit of the least. All justice has been made whole by the salvation that Jesus did when He died on the cross, and arose on the third day.

Everything that is done and believed by people in this life, is to express where they will stand in God's judgment in the last day.

I think what analysis you are making about double jeopardy and the facts plus the jurisdiction of the crime is totally different. If you kill different people at different times of course you can be prosecuted for them after you have served a jail term for one and you commit the act of another person. But in the instant analogy of the op as represented in his post, he is referring to one and only person whom the accuse was sentenced and served a jail term. I believe if the offender goes to another state, he won't be tried for that same person he killed initially since he has been punished in the first place or first court.

The jail term for murder is usually very long, in cases where it is not life imprisonment. Her life has already been wasted in jail when she did kill anyone. The woman should not be made to serve any new sentence because according to the evidence that got her sentenced, the man is already dead even though his body was never found. So, the question is, can a dead man be killed again? if the man was already dead, then he is dead. If she was pardoned after a long sentence because no body was found, now that there is a body, she can go in to continue and complete her sentence.

If I am to judge in this case, the woman has a case to answer despite being punished for a crime she didn't commit.

Where she has a case to answer is taking laws into her hands by shooting her husband whereas there is military personnel that would have got the man arrested if the matter was reported to them at first.

What the woman would have done first is to have reported the matter to the police, for them to get her husband arrested for an act of defamation. For such actions of making the woman suffer the consequences of a crime she didn't commit, the woman's husband would have ultimately paid dearly.

The majority of lawyers would be willing to step forward in cases like this one to represent the accused person's interests. They will fight for the man's sentence to prison and restitution. They will ensure that the case ultimately benefits both them and the woman. By legal standards, the woman should win this case, and her husband should make amends for his actions against her by portraying himself as dead for a considerable amount of time. Instead, she was accused and punished for his death.

Well! Judges are just judging due to the evidence that is being presented to them and the result of their judgment is nothing but a job. Unless someone pays them some money to give that verdict that's when problems arise because right now we obviously know that there are some people that are willing to take some money without hesitation even though the consequences are huge. I think the woman deserves to just place in a cell for a short time because we all know she has just been frustrated because of the guy, they stole her life from her by cheating and making her a murderer.