Topic: Is my profile eligible for signature campaigns ? (Read 642 times)

How is that possible, the unnecessary piece of information you wrote about the feedbacks can be found by everyone in the OP's trust page, what is the purpose of writing it out in your post in this thread.
Only the user who left you the feedback can remove it. But i don't think any signature campaign manager would deny you a spot in a campaign because of that feedback, it is not a valid feedback IMO, so maybe you should ignore it and lock this thread.

I guess it vary from user to user. I do not see that negative feedback because I do not have custom trust list. DefaultTrust does not shows the negative feedback.

You don't have to do anything. His feedback does not show by default because he is not a DT member. Feedback system supposed to be used to handle trading related risk. But it is often used to prevent unethical actions. His feedback is clear misuse of feedback system. Let him write more feedback like this and other DT members will judge his feedback and he may get DT exclusion due to his misuse.

I am curious, as he claims, have you ever said you are from Indian subcontinent?

The trust system is unmoderated. You can try appealing to the user who left the feedback, but they cannot be compelled to remove the trust feedback if they don't want to.

The way the system works is someone who regularly sends wrong feedback should not be included in trust lists and their feedback will not matter.

Can I appeal this negative trust somewhere because it is obvious that he gave because of his ego issues and my reply to his illogical comment on this thread ?

Your trust shows: +0 / =2 / -1



Judging by some of your posting patterns (along with the feedback), it would probably be difficult for you to be accepted in any campaign. The general quality of your posts are extremely low and that is usually synonymous with people operating more than one account (though I am not advocating it is or is not the case here) therefore if the purpose for using the account was to post and be paid, it seems you are probably wasting your time.

It's negative trust feedback but it comes from a non DT member so you have to click on Show Ratings with this link to see that feedback.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1341921

If in future that member elected in DT gang, that negative trust feedback will appear on your profile by default.

How much you will bet for the proof ? I will also give same amount if I loose this bet.


Which negative trust ? I do not see it on my profile ?

It will depend on the campaign manager whether he will make you eligible or not. Even if you have a red tag, you can do the signature campaign if the camp manager accepts you. However, if for some reason your account is banned from the forum, you will not be able to add any signature to the profile, due to which you will not be able to do signature campaigns.
However, they accept accounts that have good quality posts in campaigns that are active and that are brought in by reputable managers. And if his profile doesn't have good amount of merit earning in 120 days then they don't ineligible in their campaigns.

I agree completely that the negative trust is unfounded, the reference doesn't relate to anything that was said, so no proof was provided and if there was proof, there was no sufficient accusation for a negative trust.

I don't have that user on my trust list, but I see the negative trust on post of the user.

I don't think (and I believe that the majority will agree) that this negative tag makes sense and I hope that the person who left it will consider changing it to a neutral one. However, it is not from a DT member, so (at least for me) that negative tag is not visible in the posts.

 You got your first neutral tag by Don Pedro Dinero reason being stated by him as follows that "He misuses the merit system by proposing to give merit to whoever guesses the price of bitcoin on a date instead of giving merit for quality"
Second tag was by LoyceV reason being stated by him as follows that "This user plagiarized my post, while trying to rent out his avatar. I wouldn't hire him".
"(this feedback replaces LoyceMobile's feedback)"

I personal dropped this notice to you if in case you don't know how come about your 2 tags on your profile.
I also hope you adjust so that you don't get more or worse than the neutral tags.
However, it depends on quality posts and repetitions of a profile that campaign managers considers when hiring participants on their Campaigns. Perhaps you can be hired by some managers with your current tag so also, so managers would not hire you.

Giving feedback or tags based on interests would be abusing the trust system. There is absolutely no need for a balance in this. The trust system is created to make the forum a safer place for everyone and make shady people exposed to the general public. So the tags given should solely be for the welfare of the community instead of being for personal interests, conflicts, or to create a balance in the system.

I have noticed Op to be some kind of controversial user. Especially when he created thread in the service board to be hired for signature campaign simply because he saw some reputable members do that, LOL. I think it was at the course of doing that he plagiarised LoyceV.
According to Lovesmayfamilis, his attitude towards the fun he created could warrant Don's neutral feedback. Maybe Don didn't use the best lines of expression in the feedback.
For not leaving red tags or neutral is normal. The community should have people interested in giving red tags and people interested in only positive, that way there will be a balance in the ecosystem.

All accounts on the forum are eligible for a signature campaign provided you're not ban but accepting you in the campaign is the choice of the manager and not that of any other person on the forum.

Don't want to repeat what others have said but next time when you make a mistake, instead of acting ignorant, take corrections immediately and you might get forgiven. Your tags could've been forgotten if you followed up the matter and apologize and also made yourself useful to the forum. Two neutral aren't that bad, if you could build up your positive feedback in a legitimate way, as it could help you when your profile is being looked through by managers. Also be more active on the forums and contributing to quality discussions and it might help your case when next you apply for a campaign.

Seriously? I wouldn't believe that until I see some proof. Why would someone hire a user who doesn't even post much or has enough good-quality posts? As an advertiser, it wouldn't make sense for anyone to hire someone who posts generic posts around the forum that most people would probably ignore because that wouldn't bring enough visibility to what they're trying to promote through that user's signature. Why do you think signature campaigns only accept users with good post quality? It is because they tend to get more attention, their posts are read by more users around the forum, and that brings more visibility to the brand being advertised.

If someone can hire you, I'm pretty sure every single average poster in this forum can get offers for their signature and avatar spaces if they create their threads in the Services section but I'm pretty sure that wouldn't work because you at least need some reputation to attract advertisers, even if you don't have a very good reputation yet, you should at least be a good poster.

---

I know this is off-topic, but I'm curious to know why you abandoned this thread of yours and never made an announcement about the winner of the contest? You created the thread, made people participate in it, and then abandoned it. Why?
You also received one of the neutral tags you have because of that contest.

What a pity, you're now having an additional negative trust to the neutral tag left on your profile, maybe you need to take time in reviewing yourself and know the wrongs in which you have been doing and still continue doing, all the three tags on you are not speaking well at all, those two neutral tags were as equal as a negative one because you have been misbehaving right from time in things you do and maybe you never thought of how obvious those things have been to others, no campaign manager will see those reviews and want to hire you.

if you meet their initial requirement(like rank, merit, etc...) then it entirely depends on the signature campaign manager whether they'll accept you into their signature campaign or not. There are members who have negative feedback and are currently in the signature campaign.

Not only Yahoo. but all campaign managers wants their signature participants to be responsible on how they post, You are promoting a brand so its important to be active most of of the days in a week, and all your posts have interval to get the brand you're promoting maximum visibility.
I'm sure once you improved you can get hired on any signature campaign, the key is consistency and being a responsible poster, and keep your reputation clean by not involving into shady deals or promoting scam platforms.

Dont take it personally. The people from India who are active in the Indian local board have been trying for the last few years to encourage our people to visit and post in the local board. We have a hope to get that section up and running for any upcoming bull run in which India might (with a lot of hope) becomes the next big leader in crypto.

Speaking of campaigns, plagiarism is a big no no from my side, that is if I was managing a campaign, which will never happen. Even without a campaign you still have the ability to post and eventually earn merits over the upcoming years. So why not look forward to that?

Registered 7 years ago, still doesn't know forum rules and opens a topic like this in Meta - definitely not someone I would personally accept in a sig campaign. However, considering the fact that there are fewer and fewer quality members, in recent years even the biggest spammers are getting a chance.