Topic: Is my profile eligible for signature campaigns ? - page 2. (Read 642 times)

This was escalating quickly.


You came here to ask for advice, and as far as I can see you got enough concrete answers. Why don't you just accept it and move on, instead you are entering into a further discussion in this way.
That certainly does not help you qualify for the signature campaign.

 Some campaign managers could overlook the neutral tag pasted on your account and try to give you a shot but if you don't improve, may not last long in the campaign. My advice? Focus on your weak points and better them first before seeking to apply in a campaign. At least you know where you are falling short so this gives you enough advantage over someone who doesn't.

I support you. Your tag can also very well characterize the OP. Those who did not follow the link you left may not know all the reasons.
But I participated in this topic and saw the OP's attitude toward the "fun" he created. Apart from the pursuit of merit and his failure to fulfill his obligations, this topic held no significance. It is strange that Jolly did not leave him his tag. I can say that the OP likes to create the simplest questions in his started topics and almost never returns to them.
In addition, he has been on the forum long enough not to know what worries him here today. Based on this, could such a person be interested in promoting signature companies?

You are a Full Member and that's enough to put some colorful ads with links in the signature area. Your trust score doesn't make you ineligible, accounts that have neutral and negative trust can also get ads in their signature. It depends on the campaign manager, they all have different criteria. The more quality posts you make, the better your chances of being selected.

Before you start giving lessons the first thing you could do is to lead by example, you've been on the forum for 3 and a half years and you haven't written any neutral feedback or any negative feedback either. So you don't seem to be the best example to establish what can and can't be written in neutral feedback.

Rewarding people with your bitcoin for whatever you want is not the same as rewarding them with merit for something that has no merit at all.

Thanks yahoo62278 for coming in here. Op, a manager who recently hired has given you a desirable answer. You can now work on your posting habit.

I also think that Don's feedback doesn't actually hold water and shouldn't be in the first place. I have seen people reward users with BTC just for guessing BTC price. So, I don't find it out of place to reward anyone who guesses correctly BTC price with merits. We could call it guessing, who knows if the person actually used some TA skills to arrive at the price. That's obviously not an abuse of merit.

By having 100 merits and enough activities as a Full Member, you are qualified for the Full Member campaign cadre but equally note that the 2 tags you have are a concern. But the good thing is that they are both neutral tags, nonetheless the first is more concerning as it's related to plagiarism, however, the second one is "nothing to write home about," it's not a direct offence, so the campaign manager may not take it as a serious offence. Above all, I advise you to work on the quality of your posting going forward, that is what matters to show a change in attitude and attract the attention of CMs. Good luck!

I'm going to be brutally honest with you. Even though your trust score, having neutral tags, might not make you ineligible for participating in some signature campaigns where the managers don't reject users for having neutral tags for certain reasons, your post quality isn't impressive enough to convince a campaign manager to accept you in their campaigns and pay you for the posts you are making. Most of your posts are general responses to topics, and you can probably find a bunch of similar replies if you look through all the pages.

What I said above is also the reason why you have been around for so many years, have made more than 1900 posts, but still couldn't manage to get a considerable amount of merits even though you have been active since 2021 based on your merit history. And, let me tell you that most campaign managers also require participants to have earned at least a minimum of 5 merits in the last 120 days to qualify, so you fail in that area as well.

So overall, despite the trust score on your profile, you have a lot of work to do on building your presence in the forum. Signature campaigns are for people who are actively contributing in the forum in one way or another, with that kind of stats, you don't really deserve a spot in one. So you better make yourself worthy of getting a spot first.

No offense.

You seem more interested in my nationality on a thread I created related to doubt regarding trust system on bitcointalk. Speaks clearly who is the real clown here.

False. Here is an example:

Neutral tags do not matter for campaigns.

The question you should ask yourself is: if you were a campaign manager, would you hire yourself to participate? Do you think your posts are of sufficient quality to carry a company brand and get paid for it? I think that gives you an idea of ​​whether or not you deserve to be in a campaign.

If you are so smart then why are you getting confused? You have created a self moderated or shall I say an announcement thread to get sponsorship  from a client: Krishnaverma's Signature, Avatar and Personal Text for rent

I personally don't think you are from the Indian subcontinent as you  are trying to make a joke about yourself. If you were from the Indian subcontinent then you would have been active on multiple board related to the subcontinent.

Edit: why I am certain this guy is trying to act like a clown as he is using a username which is known in the Indian subcontinent.

What i mean by negative neutral tag is that, the comments left on your neutral speak negative of you. It could be that you are spammer, ai poster, or have an alternative accounts, some of them are people who take loans. All am saying is that any feedback left on your reference that does not speak good of you is negative feedback but was tagged neutral which means you are on watch list. Jsyk, neutral tag can have either negative or positive feedback.

Can you tell me about negative neutral tag ? How can I know if the neutral tag is negative or positive ?

You are eligible to apply for a signature campaign since you don't have a negative feedback. Although that not a criteria that you will get selected in any of the campaign because what would make you outstanding is your quality of post and merits earned. I have noticed that having a negative neutral tag reveiw will reduce your chances since campaign managers sees it as a red flag.

Your post imply I was doing mistake all over these 7 years. Reality is that I was hired in multiple campaigns during this period. I was also approached privately by advertiser and paid for renting my signature.



Yes, You are right. One line taken from your thread with modification is what every campaign manager looks for before finalizing any candidate.


I can go on with other comments you made in last post  but I do not care much especially seeing the tone of your last post.

OP has been here for 7 years. If he wanted to improve his posts, he would have done it by now.

You were plagiarizing for money.

Proper referencing would mean including quote tags.

No need to speculate, there's a Reference link with the neutral tag.

Your Merit count doesn't speak in your favor.

Most people who say that are quickly proven wrong here.

Maybe I'm too negative when it comes to plagiarism, but in my experience change is rare. Signature campaign managers can hire anyone they want. Just know you won't rank high against the competition.

I was not plagiarizing the content for likes or merits. I was making a thread of "Renting my signature" and I was using his thread as a reference. My mistake was that I liked one line there and posted it as it is or with some modification. I do not remember exactly but this might be the reason why he gave neutral tag. I have thousands of posts here till now and I have not copied post from other user or from anywhere else on internet.

I am not saying I am perfect or I did not commit any mistake. Also, if I am not accepted in any campaign, that also does not mean the end of the world. I was just clarifying if I am still eligible based on my trust .

It's neutral trust feedback so it is less harmful for your account than negative trust feedback (Red one).

You got some helpful replies above including ones from a campaign manager, yahoo62278. I'd like to share one thread for you, that can help you too.
Signature Campaign Guidelines (read this before starting or joining a campaign).

Neutral trust feedbacks won't harm your account too much, so if you can improve your post quality, you will be in campaigns soon.