Pages:
Author

Topic: Is PrimeDice Rigged ? (Read 2633 times)

sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
'Slow and steady wins the race'
August 17, 2014, 01:05:17 AM
#37
Disappointing FUD.

I understand it's in your best interest to spread random untrue facts about us like this, but at least have some sort of proof (Other than "rumor has it...") so you don't look completely stupid.

Stunna, you did the same thing to LN and me, so you should shut up!

You gave me negative trust on day 1 of LN launch without any proof, spreading false shit around because LN looks better then your site and you couldn't stand real competition.

So yes, it's nice seeing post like this appearing.

You kind of do deserve the negative trust. I went over on your website and got disappointed, very rigged site.
sr. member
Activity: 686
Merit: 255
August 15, 2014, 03:01:15 PM
#36
I never said so either. A troll came over and started to argue about reputation that's all.
Sadly it's not possible to read the whole thing to understand it since posts have been deleted, so OP is quoting something entirely out of context.

@SpanishSoldier I work with Dean, I help him with quite a few things. I'm not a fanboy like most of stunna's guys. He is just the most trustworthy and responsive person in the scene and that's why I stick to PRC. It doesn't stop me from criticizing stuff though - and he values opinions.

U r a moron and Dean should kick u out as soon as possible.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
August 12, 2014, 06:47:39 PM
#35
This thread feels like a trap to get attention away from PrimeDice but it's not going to work because prople don't like fud and lies!

All gambling is rigged Roll Eyes

So If I play poker at home with my friends it is rigged?  Is that what your telling me!   Grin Tongue
Hah you friend can have and ace hidden in his pocket or somewhere anytime if you think about it more! Tongue
But i don't think that primedice is rigged.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 500
Time is on our side, yes it is!
August 12, 2014, 06:43:04 PM
#34
This thread feels like a trap to get attention away from PrimeDice but it's not going to work because prople don't like fud and lies!

All gambling is rigged Roll Eyes

So If I play poker at home with my friends it is rigged?  Is that what your telling me!   Grin Tongue
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 1000
August 12, 2014, 04:10:02 PM
#33
All gambling is rigged Roll Eyes
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 15
August 12, 2014, 11:18:12 AM
#32
I never said so either. A troll came over and started to argue about reputation that's all.
Sadly it's not possible to read the whole thing to understand it since posts have been deleted, so OP is quoting something entirely out of context.

@SpanishSoldier I work with Dean, I help him with quite a few things. I'm not a fanboy like most of stunna's guys. He is just the most trustworthy and responsive person in the scene and that's why I stick to PRC. It doesn't stop me from criticizing stuff though - and he values opinions.
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1204
The revolution will be digital
August 12, 2014, 11:07:46 AM
#31
It's all GAY. All them dice sites are actually just gay. Very very very GAY.

This guy has the right idea. Backed with reason and proven with science. No but really this thread is fucken retarded. It is provably fair. Just like any. other. gambling. site. Why do you feel the need to spread FUD?

OP did not say PD is rigged. Someone else made that false claim and OP quoted it.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
August 12, 2014, 10:53:07 AM
#30
It's all GAY. All them dice sites are actually just gay. Very very very GAY.

This guy has the right idea. Backed with reason and proven with science. No but really this thread is fucken retarded. It is provably fair. Just like any. other. gambling. site. Why do you feel the need to spread FUD?
sr. member
Activity: 686
Merit: 255
August 12, 2014, 10:30:04 AM
#29
@DubFX There are even people talking about how to cheat them on public forums. If anyone believes they can truly check a gazillion posts then I wish them good luck.
Well, that sucks then and Stunna should search for that. I'm with PD around 8 months and never ever cheated.
Because a cheater would publicly admit it LOL.

The only way this can be proven is that Dice sites show there control panel today and tommorrow too two trusted forum members no way affiliated with them, just like an Audit Company would do.
Not needed, a proper, provably fair implementation is more than enough. Of course a site can still run with your money but currently there is technically no way around that. (just like you have to trust your real world bank, except it will be regulated while bitcoin is not)

but at least have some sort of proof (Other than "rumor has it...") so you don't look completely stupid.
Thanks for being offensive, very professional.

Nobody spread anything. Some dude claimed PRC was to be less trusted. I've replied that PD's image is not as squeaky clean as he wanted to portray it. It's been clearly called a rumor. That's all there's to it.
I don't care about PD. I don't care about it possibly being rigged in the beginning. I do care about some dude saying we're to be trusted less than PD though when a simple websearch yields accusations from multiple different sources. Of course it could be complete bull but it clearly shows that the general opinion is split and the original dude's claim wrong.

It later became obvious that the guy insulting PRC was just trolling, but sadly he deleted his posts and that part of the thread is a mess now.



Are U Dean's SockPuppet ?
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018
It's about time -- All merrit accepted !!!
August 09, 2014, 01:32:54 PM
#28
gambling is designed to make money for the house
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000
August 09, 2014, 03:23:58 AM
#27

Prime dice has no reason to rig, they have a house edge and maximum payout so to not go bankrupt on a bad run.   They have a decent user base, rigging is just illogical at this point.

I remember back in my poker days where people would constantly claim pokerstars was rigged, hahaha same thing here.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
August 08, 2014, 09:06:02 PM
#26
give the SpanishSoldier a medal for posting a topic with baseless accusation hahaha
hero member
Activity: 624
Merit: 500
August 08, 2014, 02:49:25 PM
#25
This belongs in "Service Discussion" and not "Services", correct? But really, it belongs in "Trash Can"..... just my two cents on the subject. Some real baseless FUD right there.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
August 08, 2014, 02:39:55 PM
#24
He could or could not be right about the rigging. NOW MOVE ON
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
August 08, 2014, 02:36:01 PM
#23
Disappointing FUD.

I understand it's in your best interest to spread random untrue facts about us like this, but at least have some sort of proof (Other than "rumor has it...") so you don't look completely stupid.

Stunna, you did the same thing to LN and me, so you should shut up!

You gave me negative trust on day 1 of LN launch without any proof, spreading false shit around because LN looks better then your site and you couldn't stand real competition.

So yes, it's nice seeing post like this appearing.

Looks pretty rigged to me honestly. Reference.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/luckynumberme-faking-bet-volume-using-fake-accounts-to-advertise-621659
sr. member
Activity: 309
Merit: 250
QUIFAS EXCHANGE
August 08, 2014, 12:01:12 PM
#22
Disappointing FUD.

I understand it's in your best interest to spread random untrue facts about us like this, but at least have some sort of proof (Other than "rumor has it...") so you don't look completely stupid.

Stunna, you did the same thing to LN and me, so you should shut up!

You gave me negative trust on day 1 of LN launch without any proof, spreading false shit around because LN looks better then your site and you couldn't stand real competition.

So yes, it's nice seeing post like this appearing.
global moderator
Activity: 3794
Merit: 2615
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
August 08, 2014, 11:48:37 AM
#21
but at least have some sort of proof (Other than "rumor has it...") so you don't look completely stupid.
Thanks for being offensive, very professional.

Nobody spread anything. Some dude claimed PRC was to be less trusted. I've replied that PD's image is not as squeaky clean as he wanted to portray it. It's been clearly called a rumor. That's all there's to it.

I don't care about PD. I don't care about it possibly being rigged in the beginning. I do care about some dude saying we're to be trusted less than PD though when a simple websearch yields accusations from multiple different sources. Of course it could be complete bull but it clearly shows that the general opinion is split and the original dude's claim wrong.

It later became obvious that the guy insulting PRC was just trolling, but sadly he deleted his posts and that part of the thread is a mess now.



If you get offended by being called stupid best not to post stupid shit. If we're going by a simple websearch as evidence then there's a lot of accusations that the world is being run by reptilian overlords, but they're nonsense, as is these claims. I'm sure there will be threads on here and elsewhere from sore losers, scammers and trolls accusing you of the same stuff fairly soon. And I don't think a few unbacked accusations accounts to a 'general split opinion' on PD. 99% of users here would probably have nothing but great things to say both about PD and Stunna and PD is probably one of if not the the most trusted and respected dicesites out there at the moment.
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 15
August 08, 2014, 11:30:08 AM
#20
@DubFX There are even people talking about how to cheat them on public forums. If anyone believes they can truly check a gazillion posts then I wish them good luck.
Well, that sucks then and Stunna should search for that. I'm with PD around 8 months and never ever cheated.
Because a cheater would publicly admit it LOL.

The only way this can be proven is that Dice sites show there control panel today and tommorrow too two trusted forum members no way affiliated with them, just like an Audit Company would do.
Not needed, a proper, provably fair implementation is more than enough. Of course a site can still run with your money but currently there is technically no way around that. (just like you have to trust your real world bank, except it will be regulated while bitcoin is not)

but at least have some sort of proof (Other than "rumor has it...") so you don't look completely stupid.
Thanks for being offensive, very professional.

Nobody spread anything. Some dude claimed PRC was to be less trusted. I've replied that PD's image is not as squeaky clean as he wanted to portray it. It's been clearly called a rumor. That's all there's to it.
I don't care about PD. I don't care about it possibly being rigged in the beginning. I do care about some dude saying we're to be trusted less than PD though when a simple websearch yields accusations from multiple different sources. Of course it could be complete bull but it clearly shows that the general opinion is split and the original dude's claim wrong.

It later became obvious that the guy insulting PRC was just trolling, but sadly he deleted his posts and that part of the thread is a mess now.

sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
August 08, 2014, 11:09:56 AM
#19
The only way this can be proven is that Dice sites show there control panel today and tommorrow too two trusted forum members no way affiliated with them, just like an Audit Company would do.
legendary
Activity: 3192
Merit: 1278
Primedice.com, Stake.com
August 08, 2014, 11:04:24 AM
#18
Disappointing FUD.

I understand it's in your best interest to spread random untrue facts about us like this, but at least have some sort of proof (Other than "rumor has it...")

 :Edited


In the same exact vein as OP/May I can point to plenty of people that would claim PRC is rigged or untrustworthy due to the fact that they are trailing expected profit and could be playing against their investors and how they handled the Sjess situation. However, I would never make such claims or convince myself that the former is true without solid evidence.
Pages:
Jump to: