stoshi nakamoto is satoshi nakamoto how come its actually a nick szabo?
Whats that? I can't read retard sorry. 
Topic: Is Satoshi Nakamoto actually Nick Szabo? - page 2. (Read 1816 times)
stoshi nakamoto is satoshi nakamoto how come its actually a nick szabo?
Read his papers here:
http://szabo.best.vwh.net/index.html
And tell me the tone doesnt sound familiar.
The only "evidence" that he is not Satoshi are supposed emails between wei dai and Satoshi. So much evidence FOR but only a few flimsy emails AGAINST.
Dont tell any journalists.
http://szabo.best.vwh.net/index.html
And tell me the tone doesnt sound familiar.
The only "evidence" that he is not Satoshi are supposed emails between wei dai and Satoshi. So much evidence FOR but only a few flimsy emails AGAINST.
Dont tell any journalists.
Hey dumb ass, stop asking stupid questions.
I mean only dumb ass would ask for evidence to disprove something. ie " Evidence that Satoshi is NOT ..... whatever"
Fuck off you bellend im trying to get a discussion going. Any evidence against Nick Szabo being satoshi?
It is very important that the identity of that person (or... may i say organization??) kept hidden, it adds it's own value to the bitcoin it self. One of the best unsolved mystery of the 20th century 
Absolutely agree with this. The real identity of satoshi nakamoto better keep hidden. I don't care about who really satoshi nakamoto. It is more because about 'his' security reason.
Also agree. Bitcoin moving forward is not dependent up everyone knowing the creator/creators. Maybe Satoshi felt as though this could be a distraction to the technology and will remain anon until the technology goes mainstream?
Hmm does he have skeletons in his closet?
It is very important that the identity of that person (or... may i say organization??) kept hidden, it adds it's own value to the bitcoin it self. One of the best unsolved mystery of the 20th century
Absolutely agree with this. The real identity of satoshi nakamoto better keep hidden. I don't care about who really satoshi nakamoto. It is more because about 'his' security reason.
Also agree. Bitcoin moving forward is not dependent up everyone knowing the creator/creators. Maybe Satoshi felt as though this could be a distraction to the technology and will remain anon until the technology goes mainstream?
Read his papers here:
http://szabo.best.vwh.net/index.html
And tell me the tone doesnt sound familiar.
The only "evidence" that he is not Satoshi are supposed emails between wei dai and Satoshi. So much evidence FOR but only a few flimsy emails AGAINST.
Dont tell any journalists.
http://szabo.best.vwh.net/index.html
And tell me the tone doesnt sound familiar.
The only "evidence" that he is not Satoshi are supposed emails between wei dai and Satoshi. So much evidence FOR but only a few flimsy emails AGAINST.
Dont tell any journalists.
Hey dumb ass, stop asking stupid questions.
I mean only dumb ass would ask for evidence to disprove something. ie " Evidence that Satoshi is NOT ..... whatever"
It is very important that the identity of that person (or... may i say organization??) kept hidden, it adds it's own value to the bitcoin it self. One of the best unsolved mystery of the 20th century
No, it's not. I'm right here.
In the altcoin section you get a lot less of these sig spammer comments because they don't get paid to post in there. Although there is a lot more fud and scammers to sift through, not sure which is better tbh.
I have no idea who Satoshi is.
I have no idea who Satoshi is.
It is very important that the identity of that person (or... may i say organization??) kept hidden, it adds it's own value to the bitcoin it self. One of the best unsolved mystery of the 20th century
Absolutely agree with this. The real identity of satoshi nakamoto better keep hidden. I don't care about who really satoshi nakamoto. It is more because about 'his' security reason.
"Human resources"
You sig spammers suck. No real opinions just posting bullshit for money.
A conspiracy of silence...
It is very important that the identity of that person (or... may i say organization??) kept hidden, it adds it's own value to the bitcoin it self. One of the best unsolved mystery of the 20th century
Absolutely agree with this. The real identity of satoshi nakamoto better keep hidden. I don't care about who really satoshi nakamoto. It is more because about 'his' security reason.
Nice input sig spammer here is your btc *throws pennies into the gutter*
Any real people with real opinions not these stupid turds with their 3 line replies?
Any real people with real opinions not these stupid turds with their 3 line replies?
It is very important that the identity of that person (or... may i say organization??) kept hidden, it adds it's own value to the bitcoin it self. One of the best unsolved mystery of the 20th century
Anyone got any hard evidence that he is not satoshi?
Read his papers here:
http://szabo.best.vwh.net/index.html
And tell me the tone doesnt sound familiar.
The only "evidence" that he is not Satoshi are supposed emails between wei dai and Satoshi. So much evidence FOR but only a few flimsy emails AGAINST.
Dont tell any journalists.
http://szabo.best.vwh.net/index.html
And tell me the tone doesnt sound familiar.
The only "evidence" that he is not Satoshi are supposed emails between wei dai and Satoshi. So much evidence FOR but only a few flimsy emails AGAINST.
Dont tell any journalists.
Jump to: