Pages:
Author

Topic: Is SatoshiDice illegal? - page 2. (Read 3744 times)

hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
August 22, 2012, 01:29:35 AM
#31
Bitcoin is nothing currency, but there is market for it.
Likewise, Crap credit in games, eg(NP in neopets,online games, blah blah) is not a currency, but there is not a big market for it. Not much ppl would buy it.

So, if playing a slot machine flash game with NP and potentially win/lose NP is not illegal (even for child, since Neopet is a site for children, and NP is earned upon game playing with limit 3 times/game/day (oh! is it proof of work!?))

Bitcoin is not illegal on Betting (unless new laws apply, specific on Bitcoin or these virtually 'generated' things), even under 18
you can sell your NP now can you?
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
Casper - A failed entrepenuer who looks like Zhou
August 22, 2012, 01:27:21 AM
#30
Bitcoin is nothing currency, but there is market for it.
Likewise, Crap credit in games, eg(NP in neopets,online games, blah blah) is not a currency, but there is not a big market for it. Not much ppl would buy it.

So, if playing a slot machine flash game with NP and potentially win/lose NP is not illegal (even for child, since Neopet is a site for children, and NP is earned upon game playing with limit 3 times/game/day (oh! is it proof of work!?))

Bitcoin is not illegal on Betting (unless new laws apply, specific on Bitcoin or these virtually 'generated' things), even under 18
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
August 21, 2012, 10:58:27 PM
#29
Quote
Bitcoins are not money.

Zynga also lets you gamble with internet credits, remember

Thats a very good point. But Zynga credits cannot be exchanged to a currency while Bitcoins can be exchanged to a currency.

It's not possible to exchange bitcoin to a currency on the satoshidice website. Because of this I think SD is similar to Zynga

The legal definition of gambling in the United States depends on wagering some item 'of value'. I don't believe that the fact SD doesn't do the exchange matters - for a similar situation, exceptions to the law such as what you're talking about exist elsewhere in the world - see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pachinko. The fact that we don't have similar establishments in the United States would seem to indicate to me that something that can readily be exchanged for currency would count as having a value.
hero member
Activity: 637
Merit: 502
August 21, 2012, 10:08:48 PM
#28
Quote
Bitcoins are not money.

Zynga also lets you gamble with internet credits, remember

Thats a very good point. But Zynga credits cannot be exchanged to a currency while Bitcoins can be exchanged to a currency.

It's not possible to exchange bitcoin to a currency on the satoshidice website. Because of this I think SD is similar to Zynga
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
August 21, 2012, 09:11:02 PM
#27
I hope they are not illegal otherwise I'll Ive been wasting my time maintaining my list: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/mems-list-of-gambling-sites-75883
Well online gambling is illegal in a few places, so your list is a list of illegal sites in said places
mem
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 501
Herp Derp PTY LTD
August 21, 2012, 09:09:46 PM
#26
I hope they are not illegal otherwise I'll Ive been wasting my time maintaining my list: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/mems-list-of-gambling-sites-75883
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
August 21, 2012, 08:17:17 PM
#25
I'm watching the IPO with great interest, but I'm not going anywhere near it personally - seems like a good way to get on the wrong list.

Is it an IPO in any formal capacity (shares issued by an investment bank, and regulated by some gov't body), or just by name and intent?
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
August 21, 2012, 07:44:41 PM
#24
I'm watching the IPO with great interest, but I'm not going anywhere near it personally - seems like a good way to get on the wrong list.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
August 21, 2012, 06:18:37 AM
#23
Yeah, SD is outright illegal in most countries and he totally knows it.
Plus that's profiting from the weaknesses and addictions of people.
But karma's a bitch.

Frankly, I think governments monopolizing gambling is a terrible idea, in that sense I dont have a problem with SD. If anything its arguably more honest than any legal gambling.

But that doesnt change the fact it is indeed almost certainly illegal and evoorhees trying to IPO it for a fortune without even mentioning this or while pretending its not illegal, is rather troublesome.

I thought so too, there should be a disclaimer that any investor that wants to buy in the IPO is investing in a possible illegal entity and can be shut down in any time.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008
If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat
August 21, 2012, 05:31:08 AM
#22
I agree with the OP that this is a very serious concern. From wikipedia:
Quote
t. The Act defines a bet or wager to include risking something of value on the outcome of a contest, sports event, "or a game subject to chance.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unlawful_Internet_Gambling_Enforcement_Act_of_2006

evoorhees, would you claim bitcoins are nothing of value?


Bitcoins are just our little game, we have our software and we play with it with these things we created, bitcoins. How can it be real money? And have any value? That's impossible!  Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
August 21, 2012, 04:46:13 AM
#21
Yeah, SD is outright illegal in most countries and he totally knows it.
Plus that's profiting from the weaknesses and addictions of people.
But karma's a bitch.

Frankly, I think governments monopolizing gambling is a terrible idea, in that sense I dont have a problem with SD. If anything its arguably more honest than any legal gambling.

But that doesnt change the fact it is indeed almost certainly illegal and evoorhees trying to IPO it for a fortune without even mentioning this or while pretending its not illegal, is rather troublesome.
member
Activity: 107
Merit: 10
August 21, 2012, 04:40:16 AM
#20
I agree with the OP that this is a very serious concern. From wikipedia:
Quote
t. The Act defines a bet or wager to include risking something of value on the outcome of a contest, sports event, "or a game subject to chance.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unlawful_Internet_Gambling_Enforcement_Act_of_2006

evoorhees, would you claim bitcoins are nothing of value?



Yeah, SD is outright illegal in most countries and he totally knows it.
Plus that's profiting from the weaknesses and addictions of people.
But karma's a bitch.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008
If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat
August 21, 2012, 04:16:22 AM
#19
Kim Dotcom.
Good point Smiley

Sad but true. Then again, I still gotta see if he actually gets prosecuted. I mean they arrested him all right, made a ridiculous show out of it, but now what?


I don't know what happen to him, but it seems like he is preparing to launch another file sharing service. He's actually seeking for another payment processor. Maybe we can ask him to try Bitcoin.
Already done  Wink
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1012
Democracy is vulnerable to a 51% attack.
August 21, 2012, 03:51:15 AM
#18
Quote
Federal law prohibits sports betting, but experts are divided over whether it clearly prohibits online games like poker and blackjack.
That's because there's a legitimate question whether or not they're games of chance. You can have a chess tournament with cash prices. You can't have a lottery. Satoshi Dice is pure chance.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
August 21, 2012, 03:41:24 AM
#17
I agree with the OP that this is a very serious concern. From wikipedia:
Quote
t. The Act defines a bet or wager to include risking something of value on the outcome of a contest, sports event, "or a game subject to chance.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unlawful_Internet_Gambling_Enforcement_Act_of_2006

evoorhees, would you claim bitcoins are nothing of value?

newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
August 21, 2012, 02:38:41 AM
#16
Kim Dotcom.
Good point Smiley

Sad but true. Then again, I still gotta see if he actually gets prosecuted. I mean they arrested him all right, made a ridiculous show out of it, but now what?


I don't know what happen to him, but it seems like he is preparing to launch another file sharing service. He's actually seeking for another payment processor. Maybe we can ask him to try Bitcoin.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1011
August 21, 2012, 01:31:02 AM
#15
Kim Dotcom.
Good point Smiley

Sad but true. Then again, I still gotta see if he actually gets prosecuted. I mean they arrested him all right, made a ridiculous show out of it, but now what?
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Wat
August 21, 2012, 01:28:51 AM
#14
Who gives a flying fuck what is forbidden in the US.

I host several .com sites in Europe (registered with European registrars, of course) that are probabily forbidden in the US. I couldn't care less about their shitty laws.

There are some very oppressive dictatorial regimes in the world (like North Korea, United States, Iran, etc) and we should stay as far as possible from their ridiculous censorship policies.

Kim Dotcom.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1011
August 21, 2012, 01:24:49 AM
#13
Who gives a flying fuck what is forbidden in the US.

I host several .com sites in Europe (registered with European registrars, of course) that are probabily forbidden in the US. I couldn't care less about their shitty laws.

There are some very oppressive dictatorial regimes in the world (like North Korea, United States, Iran, etc) and we should stay as far as possible from their ridiculous censorship policies.
legendary
Activity: 2506
Merit: 1010
August 21, 2012, 01:02:16 AM
#12
The owners of the gambling sites were brought to jail. If SatoshiDice wants an IPO, they need to start protecting their assets because if US cracks them down then we'll have nothing..

I don't believe the owners of the sites were actually arrested:

 - http://www.pokerblackfriday.com/whos-who/

The payment processors who billed out for the really expensive golf balls, ya -- jail.  The bank officer who allegedly accepted a bribe related to this, ... ya - jail.

Quote
Federal law prohibits sports betting, but experts are divided over whether it clearly prohibits online games like poker and blackjack.

 - http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/16/technology/16poker.html

Further information:
 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Scheinberg
Pages:
Jump to: