Topic: Is the Moon Hollow? - page 4. (Read 899 times)

According to the Russian scientist theory, the moon object was brought here in ancient times past.  The moon is much older than the earth.

So this would speak to advanced ancient civilizations way before the earth. It is all kind of mind bending for sure. But Einsteins theory of relativity, was considered crazy and also String theory, is wild and incomprehensible.

This is the part of Science that is so exciting...allowing ones mind to open up to extraordinary concepts.

Yes, it's all very interesting, just reading ALL the different articles and reports. It's a lot to go through,  but food for thought.

Here is a fascinating eye witness account written by Astronaut Pete Conrad of the November 1969 Apollo 12 mission who said it was "ringing like a gong."

https://history.nasa.gov/SP-350/ch-12-3.html


Then there is the matter of
Vasin and Shcherbakov Russian Scientists

It is interesting and extraordinary that it was 2 Russian scientists, both members of the distinguished Russian Academy of Sciences, (at that time it was known as the Soviet Academy of Sciences, ) that came up with this radical and controversial theory of a hollow moon in 1970.

The Russian Academy of Sciences, the RAS, established in 1724, and chartered by the government of Russia, is a highly reputable and esteemed network of a scientist dedicated to scientific research.


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Academy_of_Sciences
 
Vasin's and Shcherbakov's theory was fringe,  to say the least. Claiming there is scientific evidence to back it up. Saying that the moon is much more Ancient than the earth and that its surface was composed of metals and elements that do not occur naturally on the earth such as brass, mica, and radioactive elements.

Also, mentioned that the craters on the moon are shallow and all about the same depth suggesting a tough outer surface.

Our own astronauts tried to drill into the surface and the craters and could not penetrate the surface.

The discussions of the unusual and precise size of the moon, all of which is of great benefit to us, but also an anomaly compared to sizes and positions of other moons in respect to their planets is also interesting.

More on it.

https://www.gaia.com/article/the-hollow-moon-theory-is-the-moon-an-artificial-satellite

Thanks. I'm not here to argue or to try to prove anything but to just discuss these ideas and welcome thoughts on it.

It would be interested if the Moon is an artificial space station that was created to stabilize the atmosphere and make Earth human friendly.
But, this needs a lot of technological advances that people didn't have in early years so I think that this option should be out of the table.

"Listen to Strange Sounds Recorded in a Hole 5 Miles Deep" - https://www.wired.com/2014/01/an-artist-records-the-mysterious-rumblings-of-middle-earth/.

How long will it take us to be able to listen to the sounds in a deep hole on the moon, since there isn't any air on the moon to transmit sounds?

Its just a sphere,atleast that is how I am seeing it.

If earth is spehaere then all the solid planets supposed to be sphere.Anyway we need a drill to find out.

Maybe the earth is hollow. After all, moon mass gives the earth two rotational centers. One of them is the standard 24-hr daily rotational center. The other is the barycentre between the earth and the moon.

The barycentre is said to be about 1,100 miles below the earth's surface. Combined with the daily-center, during the formation of the earth, if the moon were already present, it might have kept earth material away from earth's center. There might be an actual "room" down in the center of the earth... probably not very big, but self sustaining because of certain geological forces.

After all, the suggested present structure of the earth is not factually known to be the way the earth really exists inside.

You didn't finish the quoted paragraph. Here it is.

When Apollo 12 deliberately crashed the Ascent Stage of its Lunar Module onto the Moon's surface, it was claimed that the Moon rang like a bell for an hour, leading to arguments that it must be hollow like a bell.[1] Lunar seismology experiments since then have shown that the lunar body has shallow moonquakes that act differently from quakes on Earth, due to differences in texture, type and density of the planetary strata, but there is no evidence of any large empty space inside the body.

"Rang like a bell" is a figure of speech. The acoustics of sound propagation do not require a hollow cavity for something to ring like a bell.

There's also a lot more evidence or pros and cons on this argument on the line if you're looking

There is no evidence for this argument, however it's important to be able to work through such a question to a logical answer based on math and science.

We know the  orbit of the Moon. As early as the 1960s, observations of the exact paths of lunar orbiters led to very accurate calculations of the Lunar mass. Dividing this by the volume gives a number of density per cubic meter. For the Moon to be hollow, the material forming the hollow sphere would have to be that much heavier per unit volume. And that's not the case. Other scientific evidence exists, at the bottom of your link.

Is the moon hollow? It is said it rings like a bell. Was it brought here? Is it an artificial space station brought to Earth to stabilize the atmosphere and make our planet habitable?  Is it filled, on the inside with offices of alien engineers and scientists?

It's is said that the Earth would wobble too much if the moon was not there to stabilize the gravity.

What do you think?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollow_Moon#The_Moon_rang_like_a_bell

There's also a lot more evidence or pros and cons on this argument on the line if you're looking