Topic: Is the World in the Beginning Stages of World War 3? Are you #prepped? - page 2. (Read 351 times)

You should be more concerned about your own guberments and how they are waging war on you right now.

Seems common sense has not gone too much into your thinking either.

Nuclear winters are a real concept and a real consequence to nuclear proliferation. If you'll recall to the Cold War, mutual destruction was the only thing keeping the Americans and Russians from deploying the nukes. You surely don't think either country would just stop at one, correct?

Consider that there is a difference between a nuclear test, and nuclear attack. A nuclear test stops at one deployment. Unfortunately, an attack would not, especially when there are nuclear weapons on both sides of the war.

So yes, very pointless to prep. Good luck trying to survive a nuclear attack.

"WW3 is coming!" has been proclaimed since the early 1950's...
Up to the Cuban Missile Crisis, ja, it was a valid concern but thankfully the various superpowers that own nukes have *mostly* came to their senses after that. They know that there will be no winners if they use even just a fraction of their nuclear arsenals against each other.

Unfortunately, these days a couple terrorist or otherwise loony nation states now have limited nuclear weapons capability as well and frankly do not care about 'winning' nor their survival if they actually use their weapons. If they do it will NOT be WW3 per se but I DO think that if for example, North Korea, used a nuke against ANYONE it would not be only their target country that responds in-kind. I personally feel that EVERY superpower with nuclear weapons - the US, Russia, China, France, etc - would pick a target in the offending piss-ant country and flatten it just to get the point across that actually using nukes as an offensive weapon is a very bad idea.

alot of people think a nuke is a continent/planet wide killing weapon.. they would be wrong.. on so many levels.
 
it all involves the yield of the radioactive substance determines how devastating it can be. in many developing countries they dont have much to produce something that can be a genocide level event. usually its only enough to affect a few city blocks or a city and so the enemy has to be choosy of their target.

much like 9-11 the plane could do alot of damage even without being nuclear. but they knew it is not city wide damage. so  they still chose specific targets. the reason they chose the world trade centre was not due to population numbers of citizens. it was about trying to take out the financial trade structure and the military HQ (pentagon)

so you can already see they dont want to target residential area's or normal people cities. they had a specific target of who the enemies enemy was.

so a city with no military or financial centre would not be a target. but a city with a military or financial centre would be a target.

but i do find it funny that you think that a nuke is 100% genocide scenario. where no where is safe and everyone will be dead, no option.

seems science, history and math has not gone too much into your thinking

yes the old advice of "if a nuke is targetting your city, hide under a table". is meaningless. but if your closest city is being targetted but you live 50miles+ away, so evacuate the city and go home. can help

when you realise in the past SEVERAL nuclear events have happened, in war, in tests, and in power plant malfunctions. and yet no continent wide "nuclear winter" caused genocide level death. in many cases it was limited to small area's. the marshal island testing site was so small they actually were able to put a 'concrete dome' over top of part of the island to contain the radiation

countries do not have enough nuclear yield to take out all cities, either as a continent wide genocide level single bomb or as multiple missile in their thousands for 1 per city. so they will choose best targets.

Very well said. War is not an option now, Imagine if nuclear war breaks out then nobody will survive on this globe. WW3 can only happen  in movies, dramas and fictional novels but not in reality. it can never happen though regional conflicts will continue in many parts of the world as happened in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan  and Yemen and this kind of conflicts never produce targeted objectives but cause huge causalities.

Where so, did the idiot box tell so?

Tel-lie-vision full of "experts"
https://youtu.be/fAyWT3nljBI


Its happening, SECESSION HAS BEGUN - Cities Declare Themselves Republics, I go a step further and declare myself a republic just like bill gates has done. If you friendly i my do business with you.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/AWoNZWQHIuzP/

As I have mentioned above, the era of nuclear weaponry negates all of this. Forget the military bases, stay away from the major cities. Doesn't take many nukes to destroy an entire nation. Take away the electrical grid and most military bases fail. The generators can only last for so long.

So it's really a pointless discussion. There is no prepping for WW3. The nukes come out and we're all dead. If the initial blasts don't kill you, the nuclear winter will. And it's over from there.

Prepping for WW3 only prolongs the suffering.

What is to be clear here is about resources and money. It's not about Russia or China being the bogeyman of our era but every time there is a war a debasement of world currency happens soo like EURO to USD.

Do we need war?
Of course not but just compare it to the Roman empire that's collapsing. There is the need for leadership and who do we look up to today with so many resources? Its China.


This is not accurate because the Chinese already have hypersonic missiles or we could exaggerate it like Hypersonic Nukes. It could wipe out a continent as much as possible we don't want that to happen. Even though China doesn't have the industrial-military complex that goes to countries all the time like the US, they can just shoot from thier territory without rallying on borders.

I think the way enmity is growing between CHINA and USA,  major regional conflicts are likely to breakout if not world war-3, Taiwan could be the next starting point of major conflict. History is once again repeating it self  We are again again going back to Cold war era and we clearly see US backed and CHINA/RUSSIA backed Blocks. This politics will not do any service ti humanity but escalation of arms sale which benefits major world powers and pushes developing countries toward poverty and hunger.

seems the only rational thought in this topic.

but to add to the list. all the 'aid' NGO's profit alot too. they just have to spend the money on management fee's before year end to declare no unspend cashflow reserves to be declared 'non-profit'.

as for other posts comments.
thats not how it works.
citizens didnt need to advocate for/against war, for the US to invade the middle east in 2001.
citizens then did not abandon america. all that happened is the next election flipped from red to blue. and life carried on

citizens in developed democratic countries never abandon a country, they just flip to side with a different candidate.
the only time people abandon a country. is if the country they are in is getting bombed regularly to the point where bombs are hitting residential area's, not military targets. and where it is seen as not letting up or stopping any time soon where life cant just carry on as normal after the aftermath.

a future world war wont see governments declare that all citizens need to en-roll into the military(draft/conscription). instead it will be done by drones and long distance weaponry. by higher-ranked people causing damage but not having to risk their own lives.

targets wont be city centres of just residential. but instead area's near military bases.
EG if an enemy could wipe out a 50mile wide area. they'd take out the area which has a military base as that area has a high populous of military employees living within daily commute travel distance, rather than just some random residential city no where near a military base.

so if you were to 'prep' away from something. stay away from a daily commute distance of a military base.

man i live in a poor third world country where leaders and politicians are corrupt and greedy so i think that a third world war will not directly affect my country in military terms it would only affect in economic terms it would bring disgrace to people who are already very poor. I hope the rich don't fight and we poor people suffer

Those nuclear weapons were NOT developed to be left unused. There WILL be a 3rd world war because some nations are ALREADY planning it including a spiritual one to attack the very notions of human ideals including religion,economic structures,genetic manipulation process and other technologies being brought to fruition. You are at war with yourself everyday everytime you are easily provoked to hate and whatever other destructive behaviour that originates within every human being. To win any war we must defeat our own weakness before looking outwards.

...could be one of those crazy conspiracy theories of course

We all know if a major war ever again its not country against country, but neighbour against neighbour, toxic shot (toxic people) and pure bloods.

I Know understand is that we are encouraging world war. War can't happen again because each country is wise enough with technology and other things. Instead war their will plan for invention of scientific technology that will good, America and Russian war was old and happen because of uncivilized ideas.

This is more like World War 4 (World War 3 was the cold war) is the war on you the nobody that once enjoyed the fruits of the Western world. Now the psychotic elites want mass death as in WWI and WWII so they can continue to consolidate control over the world when its all just a perception game where all the sleeping giant has to do is admit that these moneyed stamp fed elites are less than nothing themselves without the giant that is the masses of the Western World (US, Canada, UK, NZ, Europe, South Korea. Japan and Australia). Meanwhile, China and Russia plot as to what happens post-western world and how they can consolidate things to their own benefit.

All I can say to you John/Jane Nobody is to get stocked up on Food and supplies (hopefully, freeze dried foods that have a long shelf life). If you are able to buy a gun or weapons. Stock up on Ammo. Stock up on Water and other essential supplies. Get prepared or the war will eat you up.

Although I cannot be sure about if whether or not a world war will happen, what I can be a BUT certain of right now is that the next world war will be very far from ghe the world wars  1 and 2. Unlike what most people imagine which is guns to guns and bombs to bombs, what I expect to haloen if such a war is to really happen, it will be a cyber war. Just think about how advanced the weaponry of every country is. If nukes get exchanged this workd will fall apart. While biological war us possible, countries would never want to be caught on the act because ot will he considered as TABOO and will only he disadvantageous in their part. Idk really, it's just my own speculation.

Yes I agree with you that the world is extremely close to World War 3. Wherever you look, there are chances of fighting on each side of world. Since then, security issues between the many countries has been detected. China and the USA are in cold war. America has old enmity with Russia. Now factions have started forming, as if they were formed during Word War 2. And China has border disputes with about 24 countries. China remains in dispute for some Sea border too. A communist ideology has always been a threat to the world. It's my short opinion on world war 3 in which every economy will be destroyed.

New Nuremberg Trials – Crimes Against Humanity
https://justice4poland.com/2021/10/18/new-nuremberg-trials-crimes-against-humanity/

Can anyone really prepare for a WW3 in the age of nuclear technology? Maybe you could purchase a bunker, but in combination with a nuclear winter, there's not really a point. So really what's most probable is a replication of the Cold War. China, Russia, clear allies, against the US, India, UK, and France. Wonder how the economies will operate during such a stalemate of nuclear proliferation? In the best interest of the world for no one to launch the first nuke, so just decades of tension to amount to nothing (thankfully), that is if any sort of war were to break out at all.

Ford, General Motors, Messerschmitt, IBM, Rolls Royce, Boeing, Northrop, Grumman, Lockheed, Mitsubishi, Winchester, Krupps, Bath Iron Works, Seagram, John Pierpont Morgan and Goldman Sachs all made a killing during WWII. Plenty more companies stand to make a killing from any other war that pops up, no matter its scale.