Or instead of listening to random wacko, you could just look at the data. I posted this recently in another thread, but here's what the Covid-19 death rate in the US looks like, split by vaccination status. The pattern seems pretty clear to me.
https://ourworldindata.org/covid-deaths-by-vaccination
If you want to see the data behind the chart, then look here: https://data.cdc.gov/Public-Health-Surveillance/Rates-of-COVID-19-Cases-or-Deaths-by-Age-Group-and/3rge-nu2a/data
But if you don't like the CDC, then charts and backing data are available for many other countries, too. The pattern is quite consistent.
The trick here (one of the main tricks at least) is that they don't define 'vaccinated' or 'vaccinated with outcome'. This is deliberate.
People who do know a little something about the science (of the propaganda) will know that 'vaccinated' and 'injected' are two very different things. It's usually not defined, but the window of being 'vaccinated' starts several weeks after the 2nd jab then includes only a window of 2.5 months or 5.5 months. After that, the idiot pleb is back to being counted as being 'unvaccinated' again unless they are dumb enough to go in for a 'booster'. That info had to be dug out of docs which were accidentally released by some ignorant bureaucrat on a number of instances, and when the 'info leak' was discovered it was quickly memory-holed. Even archive.org wiped it in some instances...which should give people pause before donating to them.
The time between the first jab and two weeks after the 2nd (or the 'booster') and are thus 'vaccinated' just happens to be when a majority of the immediate adverse reactions take people out. Funny that. But that's beside the point for this discussion.
The secret definitions could be changed to 'vaccinated = immune' and 'unvaccinated = non-immune' regardless of injection status. That would make the charts look very pretty for the message board posts, but it's infeasible because everyone knows jabbed people who've been told they got 'covid-19' in a 'breakthrough case'. So they have to be just a little bit more careful in their propaganda hucksterism. Doesn't take much to fool the sheeple though, and they don't pick up on this kind of stuff very well.