Topic: Is this the new strategy? - page 10. (Read 1994 times)
I haven't experience a bounty were investors gets their coins first. Usually, bounty tokens will be sent first before it even hit the exchange. (this is just on bounties I joined). Some sent it have the same distribution for bounty and investors. I think this could affect the coin price but only in a short term. It will still depend on the products demand and if the developers are working on it. Don't blame everything on bounty hunters selling their coin. It is their right to sell their coin so as others holding their own coin. Live and let live man.
The budget allocated for bounty campaign is just 1-5% only of the total supply I don't think this will really affect the prices if bounty hunters dump their rewards and bounty hunters have all the right to dump their tokens or hold. I also don't think all bounty hunters are dumpers there are also some bounty hunters who are holders and believe in the project they joined.
I do not think bounty hunter or investors dump the token. I think people need to accept ICO and crypocurrency for what it is. What you are investing fund or time on is high risk, high reward investment and you could be extremely rich or get burnt to the ground! We should stop the blame game ASAP!
the incident has become common, many ICO advisers suggest to prioritize investors. dump can not be prevented, because bountyhunter usually has many addresses ready to invade the market at once. I usually sell Tokens above ICO prices. if when the listing has not reached the target price of ICO then I will hold
This situation is more on hunters actions, they will immediately dump the token they get from bounty, and so the tokens price is down, compared to the ICO price.
Some ICOs lock tokens in 2 month for bounty campains. It is unfair. Bounty hunter do invite, PR,... for projects but they take less profit than investor.
Not necessarily. The dump isn't always because of bounty hunters dumping their percentage off in an exchange.
It might also mean early investors getting out of the scene after knowing certain flaws in an ICO or losing credibility thereafter.
It all boils down to the exact ICO in the first place.
If you don't like their terms, then don't apply. Simple.
It might also mean early investors getting out of the scene after knowing certain flaws in an ICO or losing credibility thereafter.
Some ICOs lock tokens in 2 month for bounty campains. It is unfair. Bounty hunter do invite, PR,... for projects but they take less profit than investor.
It all boils down to the exact ICO in the first place.
If you don't like their terms, then don't apply. Simple.
Just recently i noticed a common trend with almost all ICOs.
There have been lots of complains that bounty hunters dump their tokens immediately after receiving them. Although, it is not true for all bounty hunters. Some still hold theirs.
Investors now get their tokens before bounty hunters. They are also allowed to start trading before bounty hunters get their rewards.
I believe this will prevent the investors from complaining and blaming the dump in price on bounty hunters.
There have been lots of complains that bounty hunters dump their tokens immediately after receiving them. Although, it is not true for all bounty hunters. Some still hold theirs.
Investors now get their tokens before bounty hunters. They are also allowed to start trading before bounty hunters get their rewards.
I believe this will prevent the investors from complaining and blaming the dump in price on bounty hunters.
Not a new strategy, as I remember ICOs doing it years ago. But it's actually a pretty decent idea.
Only little problem is, quite often that turns into investors dumping before bounty hunters do, as they expect
a dump as soon as the bounty coins are released. It may delay the initial dump, however, so there is a chance for a bit of a rise and dump back down to ICO-ish or so levels.
I agree with this idea but, but this makes bounty hunters wait a long time to get their coins but they also have to keep promises to distribute tokens according to the agreed time
It is true that investors have the first privilege to benefit from echange sites. Unlike bounty hunters a few months before they get their free tokens.
It is true that there are bounty hunters who holding their token, but they are bounty hunters at the same time, they also invest.
But those Bounty hunters who only received the free tokens, they are those who oftenly dumped the tokens.
In my opinion, only a few investors are selling their tokens immediately.
Usually they are holding even if they have the privilege of exchange.
It is true that there are bounty hunters who holding their token, but they are bounty hunters at the same time, they also invest.
But those Bounty hunters who only received the free tokens, they are those who oftenly dumped the tokens.
In my opinion, only a few investors are selling their tokens immediately.
Usually they are holding even if they have the privilege of exchange.
I don't sure is that the hunter dumps the coin, for me, I have invested the ICO before and received the token before the hunter, and all the bounty hunter will receive it after a month later, but I still saw the people dump the coin in the market. Guess what? The investors earn the more bouns in the ICO, and dump it first.
Just recently i noticed a common trend with almost all ICOs.
There have been lots of complains that bounty hunters dump their tokens immediately after receiving them. Although, it is not true for all bounty hunters. Some still hold theirs.
Investors now get their tokens before bounty hunters. They are also allowed to start trading before bounty hunters get their rewards.
I believe this will prevent the investors from complaining and blaming the dump in price on bounty hunters.
Good idea so what you have to do is to promote this to different marketing managers including the bounty managers. There have been lots of complains that bounty hunters dump their tokens immediately after receiving them. Although, it is not true for all bounty hunters. Some still hold theirs.
Investors now get their tokens before bounty hunters. They are also allowed to start trading before bounty hunters get their rewards.
I believe this will prevent the investors from complaining and blaming the dump in price on bounty hunters.
or
You can visit each of their reachable contacts like telegram and ask them to do this so that investors will have a better part of their ICO.
Socratus is a crypto project that will help you earn I advise you because I myself in Socratus
I think this is one of the strategy by most project anchor to prevent people from dumping their coin/token. Even most go to the extent of sharing negligible reward to their bounty hunters which I think is not an appropriate act. I believe value of a coin should speak in market irrespective of whether people dump.
Investors now get their tokens before bounty hunters. They are also allowed to start trading before bounty hunters get their rewards.
I believe this will prevent the investors from complaining and blaming the dump in price on bounty hunters.
I think it is quite old practice and have seen such projects also during early 2017. Bounty hunters get their tokens for free while investors have bought them for real fiat so investors should be given opportunity to trade it first but when they will know that bounty hunters gonna come soon to dump their tokens, ICO investors will just keep the price lower by setting big buy orders at near or less than ICO price to get cheap coins from bounty hunters before driving the price up like crazy. I believe this will prevent the investors from complaining and blaming the dump in price on bounty hunters.
Just recently i noticed a common trend with almost all ICOs.
There have been lots of complains that bounty hunters dump their tokens immediately after receiving them. Although, it is not true for all bounty hunters. Some still hold theirs.
Investors now get their tokens before bounty hunters. They are also allowed to start trading before bounty hunters get their rewards.
I believe this will prevent the investors from complaining and blaming the dump in price on bounty hunters.
Most of the good projects already implement a kind of lock in period where they distribute the bounty and airdrop tokens after they are already doing to the investors.So it's nothing new There have been lots of complains that bounty hunters dump their tokens immediately after receiving them. Although, it is not true for all bounty hunters. Some still hold theirs.
Investors now get their tokens before bounty hunters. They are also allowed to start trading before bounty hunters get their rewards.
I believe this will prevent the investors from complaining and blaming the dump in price on bounty hunters.
I remember several projects that are listed on the exchange before being distributed to bounty hunters. The price in this case also fell immediately after the listing.
Just recently i noticed a common trend with almost all ICOs.
There have been lots of complains that bounty hunters dump their tokens immediately after receiving them. Although, it is not true for all bounty hunters. Some still hold theirs.
Investors now get their tokens before bounty hunters. They are also allowed to start trading before bounty hunters get their rewards.
I believe this will prevent the investors from complaining and blaming the dump in price on bounty hunters.
There have been lots of complains that bounty hunters dump their tokens immediately after receiving them. Although, it is not true for all bounty hunters. Some still hold theirs.
Investors now get their tokens before bounty hunters. They are also allowed to start trading before bounty hunters get their rewards.
I believe this will prevent the investors from complaining and blaming the dump in price on bounty hunters.
Jump to: