Topic: Is this the new strategy? - page 4. (Read 1994 times)
Unfortunately, it's like a new rule, sometimes bounty tokens are served months after the sale end. Morpheus is a good(more like a bad) example of being so unrespectful to bounty hunters. They threaten you with the ban if you start asking too active for tokens.
-snip-
I think the token rate for bounty is not much. So if the bounty hunter sells the token, it will not affect the price. It is important that a good project will keep the price stable.
Just recently i noticed a common trend with almost all ICOs.
There have been lots of complains that bounty hunters dump their tokens immediately after receiving them. Although, it is not true for all bounty hunters. Some still hold theirs.
Investors now get their tokens before bounty hunters. They are also allowed to start trading before bounty hunters get their rewards.
I believe this will prevent the investors from complaining and blaming the dump in price on bounty hunters.
There have been lots of complains that bounty hunters dump their tokens immediately after receiving them. Although, it is not true for all bounty hunters. Some still hold theirs.
Investors now get their tokens before bounty hunters. They are also allowed to start trading before bounty hunters get their rewards.
I believe this will prevent the investors from complaining and blaming the dump in price on bounty hunters.
I think the token rate for bounty is not much. So if the bounty hunter sells the token, it will not affect the price. It is important that a good project will keep the price stable.
I don't sure is that the hunter dumps the coin, for me, I have invested the ICO before and received the token before the hunter, and all the bounty hunter will receive it after a month later, but I still saw the people dump the coin in the market. Guess what? The investors earn the more bouns in the ICO, and dump it first.
But mostly they put blame into bounty hunters and that's also create misunderstanding between participants and developers. It is also another reason why there is a delay for rewards distribution to prevent from that certain scenarios.
this strategy might be good for investors but is this also a good strategy for bounty hunters, maybe most of the bounty hunters will not accept this new strategy, because they will think that this will be very unfair because investors receive tokens instead. first from an ico, while the ico development team instead ruled out bounty hunters, it is better to rethink this strategy whether it will help or even make the hunters go out.
I have already observed how tokens come first to investors, and only then to hunters!
Not sure that bounty participants able to influence on a price. Keep in mind, that there no more than 1 percent of all emission usually send for bounty
There are so many people who are participating in different kind of bounty campaigns and that they are also making some good amount of money too. However, you have to work harder at time you are busy in bounty and that you have to give enough of your time and efforts to it so that you can then get higher merits which will then result in more money for your better earning.
Why not pay hunters in Eth instead? The truth is that these ico projects are only concerned about making profit. They do not care if the value of their tokens dips below ico price after listing on exchange. They do not have the interest of their investors at heart not to talk of bounty hunters
Just recently i noticed a common trend with almost all ICOs.
There have been lots of complains that bounty hunters dump their tokens immediately after receiving them. Although, it is not true for all bounty hunters. Some still hold theirs.
Investors now get their tokens before bounty hunters. They are also allowed to start trading before bounty hunters get their rewards.
I believe this will prevent the investors from complaining and blaming the dump in price on bounty hunters.
There have been lots of complains that bounty hunters dump their tokens immediately after receiving them. Although, it is not true for all bounty hunters. Some still hold theirs.
Investors now get their tokens before bounty hunters. They are also allowed to start trading before bounty hunters get their rewards.
I believe this will prevent the investors from complaining and blaming the dump in price on bounty hunters.
That is not a new thing, investors should be received the token first, then the hunters later. As an investors, if they already pay but not yet receiving any tokens, they will doubt the company because slow and will sell the tokens after it listed on the market.
This can be a solution but I think this change nothing because in this way investors that believe in project and hold coins will not have any advantages compared to before.
Just recently i noticed a common trend with almost all ICOs.
There have been lots of complains that bounty hunters dump their tokens immediately after receiving them. Although, it is not true for all bounty hunters. Some still hold theirs.
Investors now get their tokens before bounty hunters. They are also allowed to start trading before bounty hunters get their rewards.
I believe this will prevent the investors from complaining and blaming the dump in price on bounty hunters.
LoL. That are just blame. Because the projects only allocate 1-5% total supply for bounty campaigns (maybe more 5%, but rarely). That 5% will dump their tokens?!? Kidding me? They always have a bonus for pre-sale, pre-ICO,... (maybe have 2nd phase, 3rd phase,...) with 25%, 50%, even 100%. Then they said ICO price: 1 token = $100. So, 1 token really worth $50 because of the bonus. Therefore, that is not the fault of bounty hunters. There have been lots of complains that bounty hunters dump their tokens immediately after receiving them. Although, it is not true for all bounty hunters. Some still hold theirs.
Investors now get their tokens before bounty hunters. They are also allowed to start trading before bounty hunters get their rewards.
I believe this will prevent the investors from complaining and blaming the dump in price on bounty hunters.
I have no such an experience that they made refund when ICO failed.
I have experienced the opposite when the ICO raised funds the Team disappeared and no further development and no any refund was made.
I have experienced the opposite when the ICO raised funds the Team disappeared and no further development and no any refund was made.
Just recently i noticed a common trend with almost all ICOs.
There have been lots of complains that bounty hunters dump their tokens immediately after receiving them. Although, it is not true for all bounty hunters. Some still hold theirs.
Investors now get their tokens before bounty hunters. They are also allowed to start trading before bounty hunters get their rewards.
I believe this will prevent the investors from complaining and blaming the dump in price on bounty hunters.
There have been lots of complains that bounty hunters dump their tokens immediately after receiving them. Although, it is not true for all bounty hunters. Some still hold theirs.
Investors now get their tokens before bounty hunters. They are also allowed to start trading before bounty hunters get their rewards.
I believe this will prevent the investors from complaining and blaming the dump in price on bounty hunters.
I do not know what the hunters think and what they imagine, I do not understand.
Surely we will not follow in their footsteps, because it's bad.
Things like this can hurt us all, it's hard to do bounty when the price goes down.
Just recently i noticed a common trend with almost all ICOs.
There have been lots of complains that bounty hunters dump their tokens immediately after receiving them. Although, it is not true for all bounty hunters. Some still hold theirs.
Investors now get their tokens before bounty hunters. They are also allowed to start trading before bounty hunters get their rewards.
I believe this will prevent the investors from complaining and blaming the dump in price on bounty hunters.
There have been lots of complains that bounty hunters dump their tokens immediately after receiving them. Although, it is not true for all bounty hunters. Some still hold theirs.
Investors now get their tokens before bounty hunters. They are also allowed to start trading before bounty hunters get their rewards.
I believe this will prevent the investors from complaining and blaming the dump in price on bounty hunters.
there are projects that bounty hunters doesnt dump. when the team and bounty manager integrity is high, there is no mis management and sudden changes in the rules, hunters tend to be loyal investors also. but if the management is poor and rules are not bounty hunter friendly, then hunters dump. so it is a mutual respect.
However, in my opinion, only a part of the sale is sold, and most people will still choose to hold on to it.
So in my opinion, the bounty thread really helps the project team a lot.
So in my opinion, the bounty thread really helps the project team a lot.
Just recently i noticed a common trend with almost all ICOs.
There have been lots of complains that bounty hunters dump their tokens immediately after receiving them. Although, it is not true for all bounty hunters. Some still hold theirs.
Investors now get their tokens before bounty hunters. They are also allowed to start trading before bounty hunters get their rewards.
I believe this will prevent the investors from complaining and blaming the dump in price on bounty hunters.
There have been lots of complains that bounty hunters dump their tokens immediately after receiving them. Although, it is not true for all bounty hunters. Some still hold theirs.
Investors now get their tokens before bounty hunters. They are also allowed to start trading before bounty hunters get their rewards.
I believe this will prevent the investors from complaining and blaming the dump in price on bounty hunters.
There have been many great and well-executed projects implementing such strategies.
It's like a key in the period in which they distribute gift tokens and airdrop after they get the funds from the investors.
So, this is not new, we have to get used to it.
The project team must know everything which affect their success of project. They must prepare all solutions before ICO. It's not all foul of bounty hunters.
This strategy already use it by many project before, actually this is good strategy to protect investor from loss. Investor should be become number 1 because from them the project will be success and the bounty hunter will get reward. Beside that, all project should be have other protection for investor like buy back program and burn token model to reduce the supply.
how is your view in seeing this good opportunity? How investors identify whether or not a management team is leading to something good for investors, having something tangible and information provided accurately and realistically - or an ICO that is just a step without a clear vision, is nothing more than a blind step of a business idea ?
The concept of ICO is very simple. By downloading from Bitcoin your open source code to get Altcoin - an alternative coin - used as an underlying token in favor of movement and value transfer among users on the Blockchain network. The new coin allocated management, at this stage token is distributed to investors, who can benefit from increasing their value as new business customers and / or new coins to be traded.
The concept of ICO is very simple. By downloading from Bitcoin your open source code to get Altcoin - an alternative coin - used as an underlying token in favor of movement and value transfer among users on the Blockchain network. The new coin allocated management, at this stage token is distributed to investors, who can benefit from increasing their value as new business customers and / or new coins to be traded.
Just recently i noticed a common trend with almost all ICOs.
There have been lots of complains that bounty hunters dump their tokens immediately after receiving them. Although, it is not true for all bounty hunters. Some still hold theirs.
Investors now get their tokens before bounty hunters. They are also allowed to start trading before bounty hunters get their rewards.
I believe this will prevent the investors from complaining and blaming the dump in price on bounty hunters.
There have been lots of complains that bounty hunters dump their tokens immediately after receiving them. Although, it is not true for all bounty hunters. Some still hold theirs.
Investors now get their tokens before bounty hunters. They are also allowed to start trading before bounty hunters get their rewards.
I believe this will prevent the investors from complaining and blaming the dump in price on bounty hunters.
The true inevestor is long-term thinking, whereas most bounty hunters are payroll takers immediately selling their tokens. I think your strategy is hard to implement.
Jump to: