The substance of your complaint appears to be a password allegation which was incorrect and misleading and explained as such in the very thread you link to...
And the fact that he's opposed to Ripple.
Okay. Well I think that Ripple is a risky system, which is deceptively marketed, created and constructed in a way which can be reasonably expected to generate finical losses for its users and wealth transference to it operator. As it is currently stands it is a centralized system and on the basis of the system as described in public I have serious concerns that it is technically viable as a decentralized system. The centralization creates substantial regulatory and plain-boring security risks, and more simply is inconsistent with how they've advertised it. The operators of ripple may freely adjust balances at will and may be required to do so by any coercive power with authority over them. The same is true of services like mtgox, but they aren't advertised as anything else— and presumably people have some idea what risks they are taking when they leave funds with a service. These centralization risks combined with the incorrect notion that ripple is something else may be creating an elevated extensional risk for Bitcoin: If ripple suffers a massive failure it may (unfairly) cast a shadow on Bitcoin.
Moreover, the ripple of today was created by purchasing the name of a prior system which the current system is largely unrelated to in order to exploit the positive reputation of the name, further creating confusion about what what ripple is and isn't.
So now that I've also expressed concerns (
see also) about ripple will the pro-ripple troll and shill army now start spreading spurious scam accusations about me?