You seems to be indulging in a campaign of disinformation. The Anti-Balaka was formed in 2013, after the ex-Seleka started the killings of innocent Christians.
I'm sorry but if anyone is indulging in disinformation is you, Seleka was disbanded in 2013
Anti-Balaka was formed in the 90s and their armed activities started to scale in 2009 to reach it peak in 2013 with the new president of central africaSource :
http://en.apa.az/xeber_cafrica_militia_is_an_enemy_of_peace__f_206912.htmlhttp://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-balakaHeck even the english wiki mentions the 90s origines without going to details :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-balakaOnce again, no such thing was documented, Some of the Monks gave such excuxes to rally people without a single proof, the Islamophobia runs deep in some monks, and the felling came from Sri Linka events. According to many international instances the Muslim population is Maynmar was of peacefull and never done anything to get what they are getting
May be you should go through this:
On the evening of 28 May, a group of Muslim men robbed, raped and murdered an ethnic Rakhine woman, Ma Thida Htwe, near her village Tha Pri Chaung on May 28 in 2012, when she was returning home from Kyauk Ni Maw Village of Rambree township.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Rakhine_State_riotsJust a reminder of what you said
People got tired of the endless number of rapes and murders committed by the Rohingya. And both the sides lost people during the conflict.
So the best you could come out with is one case, which in no way is an argument against my initial replay on this precise point and again as a reminder :
Myanmar : Even if we assume the excuse you are making here is true which is NOT but for sake of or argumentation let's assume so :So a Muslim commited a crime, so instead of taken him to prison, lets kill all the Muslims because that make sense right? Your logic is one again flawless.
Once again this is not the reason why the events started that was just one of many excuses that some monks advertised to get the mass to follow them and to massacre muslims.
The Khmer Rouges were indeed xenophobic and killed foreigners and this is a fact, but I'm talking about the fact they killed their own Muslims just because they are muslims within their population which is definitly an Islamophobic act, One does not stop from being the other
95% of the people killed by the Khmer Rogue was Buddhist. So your argument is invalid.
First of all I invite you to post a proof of this claim, and secondly I invite you to explain how my arguments is invalid, as the vast majority of people that were killed were either foreigners or Muslims, Like I said before Khmer rouges (red in french) are Xenophobe and Islamophobe bunch. If the ratio of LOCAL (population) Buddist deaths is no where 95% then I'll concede as a non argument, but if you can't provide a single proof of such a thing then I'm sorry but the argument that would be invalide is yours.
Serbian Muslims? The Muslims in Bosnia are Serbs, who converted to Islam from Orthodoxy during the Ottoman rule. They are now known as Bosnian Muslims. There were no Muslims among the Bosnian Serbs. So please don't lie here.
Euh? So far, and as proven above if anyone is lying here that would be you, but let's keep this discussion civil shall we : So I'll answer this from two perspectives to prove you wrong :the first would be Bosnian Muslims which are serbs ethnicity exist, and please do check your facts, while yes Serbs are predominatly Christians as Bosnia
Ks are predominately Muslims, doesn't mean there wasn't Bosnians serbs that were Muslims, and the whole point of them living in Srebrenica is because they are muslims. The other proof, is that even in Serbia there are Muslims
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:BoristheSavic99You can check the appendixs for examples of Muslim serbs.