Pages:
Author

Topic: Islamophobia has never killed anyone. Muslim hate crimes are by Muslims. - page 5. (Read 6000 times)

legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1217

Ahmad has shown to have an affinity for radical Islamist groups that seek to employ deceptive tactics in order to advance Sharia law, Breitbart News has found. Ahmad has attended and participated in multiple conferences over the past couple years which were hosted by alleged Muslim Brotherhood front groups. She has also proudly written about, and has happily posed in photos with radical Imams.


Wonderful news. Remember that she is working as the Northwestern University chaplain. I can only guess how many people will be brainwashed by her Jihadi rhetoric. The Americans will never learn from any of their past mistakes. I thought that they'll change for the better after the Boston attacks. Seems like I was being over-optimistic.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
How is it not discrimination? The flight attendant didn't have any problem with the other passengers. Gave one an unopened can of beer in front of the muslim woman. Funny the article didn't say anything about that. Or about the other passenger's reactions. And how one insulted her and repeated that she would use the can as a weapon: http://rt.com/usa/263653-united-airlines-muslim-coke

I think the United Airlines PR has already apologized to Tahera Ahmad for the behavior of its staff. May be its time to put the issue behind and move on, rather than adding fuel to the fire.

Sure. This shouldn't received more attention than it deserves. I was only explaining how that was discrimination. Some people here didn't think it was. And the article in the op didn't explain what happened, just made fun of the situation. So I posted a decent article.

You are right, this was very good example of discrimination against Muslim.
In fact, what makes the situation even worse is the reaction of other passengers, who showed open hostility and hatred towards this lady.
It seems that this situation, better than all the words and declarations, shows the prevailing trend in the general population of America.....

Maybe not.  Maybe that's all false misleading deception spoon fed to you.  Maybe the lady wasn't much of "a lady."

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/06/01/muslim-united-airlines-passenger-alleging-discrimination-has-ties-to-suspect-islamist-groups-radical-imams/



Ahmad has shown to have an affinity for radical Islamist groups that seek to employ deceptive tactics in order to advance Sharia law, Breitbart News has found. Ahmad has attended and participated in multiple conferences over the past couple years which were hosted by alleged Muslim Brotherhood front groups. She has also proudly written about, and has happily posed in photos with radical Imams.

In late December, Ahmad attended the MAS-ICNA (Muslim American Society- Islamic Circle of North America) conference, which featured prominent leaders within the global Muslim Brotherhood network.

One month earlier, Ahmad posted a picture to Facebook of her standing next to Suhaib Webb, who is the Imam of the Islamic Society of Boston, an outfit run under the same umbrella organization as the mosque attended by Boston Marathon bombers Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev, and a plethora of other convicted terrorists. Webb has a demonstrated history of radical connections, including him being a close confidant of Al Qaeda mastermind Anwar al Awlaki prior to the 9/11 attacks.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
How is it not discrimination? The flight attendant didn't have any problem with the other passengers. Gave one an unopened can of beer in front of the muslim woman. Funny the article didn't say anything about that. Or about the other passenger's reactions. And how one insulted her and repeated that she would use the can as a weapon: http://rt.com/usa/263653-united-airlines-muslim-coke

I think the United Airlines PR has already apologized to Tahera Ahmad for the behavior of its staff. May be its time to put the issue behind and move on, rather than adding fuel to the fire.

Sure. This shouldn't received more attention than it deserves. I was only explaining how that was discrimination. Some people here didn't think it was. And the article in the op didn't explain what happened, just made fun of the situation. So I posted a decent article.



I smell a rat...





Very well connected. Calling all the #blacklivesmatter crew for help right way... Could be another fake isla-momo-phobia crime...

Ask her what she thinks of gays being stoned to death in islamic countries then we would know what she really is...


 Cool




legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
How is it not discrimination? The flight attendant didn't have any problem with the other passengers. Gave one an unopened can of beer in front of the muslim woman. Funny the article didn't say anything about that. Or about the other passenger's reactions. And how one insulted her and repeated that she would use the can as a weapon: http://rt.com/usa/263653-united-airlines-muslim-coke

I think the United Airlines PR has already apologized to Tahera Ahmad for the behavior of its staff. May be its time to put the issue behind and move on, rather than adding fuel to the fire.

Sure. This shouldn't received more attention than it deserves. I was only explaining how that was discrimination. Some people here didn't think it was. And the article in the op didn't explain what happened, just made fun of the situation. So I posted a decent article.

You are right, this was very good example of discrimination against Muslim.
In fact, what makes the situation even worse is the reaction of other passengers, who showed open hostility and hatred towards this lady.
It seems that this situation, better than all the words and declarations, shows the prevailing trend in the general population of America.
The people are so brainwashed by the media that every Muslim is seen as a potential enemy and terrorists.
What happened to America, a leader of democracy and human rights in the world?
Unfortunately, America is really changed since 2001 and became intolerant and hateful towards differences in religion, race, nationality etc.
Yes, Islamophobia has never killed anyone but kill the character and soul of people.

Wait a minute.  You mean if some Muslim wants to hide their face uner their hijab, I can't hide my coke cans under my cart?

LOL!

Unfortunately, Islam is something that becomes dangerous. Experience has taught us that.

Someone might say that freedom is more dangerous. After all, look at all the things free America is doing to the Middle East right now!

I'd say that we are lucky something like Islam isn't free. We are lucky that Islam is the place some warped and retarded people go because they think that lack of freedom is a good thing. Well, this lack of freedom has taken away their ability to think straight. How do we know? If they could think straight, they would do one of two things better. Either they would win the war rather than being destroyed as is happening, or they would really become free by leaving Islam.

Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
How is it not discrimination? The flight attendant didn't have any problem with the other passengers. Gave one an unopened can of beer in front of the muslim woman. Funny the article didn't say anything about that. Or about the other passenger's reactions. And how one insulted her and repeated that she would use the can as a weapon: http://rt.com/usa/263653-united-airlines-muslim-coke

I think the United Airlines PR has already apologized to Tahera Ahmad for the behavior of its staff. May be its time to put the issue behind and move on, rather than adding fuel to the fire.

Sure. This shouldn't received more attention than it deserves. I was only explaining how that was discrimination. Some people here didn't think it was. And the article in the op didn't explain what happened, just made fun of the situation. So I posted a decent article.

You are right, this was very good example of discrimination against Muslim.
In fact, what makes the situation even worse is the reaction of other passengers, who showed open hostility and hatred towards this lady.
It seems that this situation, better than all the words and declarations, shows the prevailing trend in the general population of America.
The people are so brainwashed by the media that every Muslim is seen as a potential enemy and terrorists.
What happened to America, a leader of democracy and human rights in the world?
Unfortunately, America is really changed since 2001 and became intolerant and hateful towards differences in religion, race, nationality etc.
Yes, Islamophobia has never killed anyone but kill the character and soul of people.

Wait a minute.  You mean if some Muslim wants to hide their face uner their hijab, I can't hide my coke cans under my cart?
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1824
How is it not discrimination? The flight attendant didn't have any problem with the other passengers. Gave one an unopened can of beer in front of the muslim woman. Funny the article didn't say anything about that. Or about the other passenger's reactions. And how one insulted her and repeated that she would use the can as a weapon: http://rt.com/usa/263653-united-airlines-muslim-coke

I think the United Airlines PR has already apologized to Tahera Ahmad for the behavior of its staff. May be its time to put the issue behind and move on, rather than adding fuel to the fire.

Sure. This shouldn't received more attention than it deserves. I was only explaining how that was discrimination. Some people here didn't think it was. And the article in the op didn't explain what happened, just made fun of the situation. So I posted a decent article.

You are right, this was very good example of discrimination against Muslim.
In fact, what makes the situation even worse is the reaction of other passengers, who showed open hostility and hatred towards this lady.
It seems that this situation, better than all the words and declarations, shows the prevailing trend in the general population of America.
The people are so brainwashed by the media that every Muslim is seen as a potential enemy and terrorists.
What happened to America, a leader of democracy and human rights in the world?
Unfortunately, America is really changed since 2001 and became intolerant and hateful towards differences in religion, race, nationality etc.
Yes, Islamophobia has never killed anyone but kill the character and soul of people.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
How is it not discrimination? The flight attendant didn't have any problem with the other passengers. Gave one an unopened can of beer in front of the muslim woman. Funny the article didn't say anything about that. Or about the other passenger's reactions. And how one insulted her and repeated that she would use the can as a weapon: http://rt.com/usa/263653-united-airlines-muslim-coke

I think the United Airlines PR has already apologized to Tahera Ahmad for the behavior of its staff. May be its time to put the issue behind and move on, rather than adding fuel to the fire.

Sure. This shouldn't received more attention than it deserves. I was only explaining how that was discrimination. Some people here didn't think it was. And the article in the op didn't explain what happened, just made fun of the situation. So I posted a decent article.

Ahhhh.... poor lady....refused a coke.....

"Islamophobia never killed her....just refused her a coke."

"Islam kills Islam..."
legendary
Activity: 1135
Merit: 1001
How is it not discrimination? The flight attendant didn't have any problem with the other passengers. Gave one an unopened can of beer in front of the muslim woman. Funny the article didn't say anything about that. Or about the other passenger's reactions. And how one insulted her and repeated that she would use the can as a weapon: http://rt.com/usa/263653-united-airlines-muslim-coke

I think the United Airlines PR has already apologized to Tahera Ahmad for the behavior of its staff. May be its time to put the issue behind and move on, rather than adding fuel to the fire.

Sure. This shouldn't received more attention than it deserves. I was only explaining how that was discrimination. Some people here didn't think it was. And the article in the op didn't explain what happened, just made fun of the situation. So I posted a decent article.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1217
How is it not discrimination? The flight attendant didn't have any problem with the other passengers. Gave one an unopened can of beer in front of the muslim woman. Funny the article didn't say anything about that. Or about the other passenger's reactions. And how one insulted her and repeated that she would use the can as a weapon: http://rt.com/usa/263653-united-airlines-muslim-coke

I think the United Airlines PR has already apologized to Tahera Ahmad for the behavior of its staff. May be its time to put the issue behind and move on, rather than adding fuel to the fire.

legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386

Interesting article about pseudo and contrived victimization.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/dgreenfield/the-islamophobia-revolution-will-be-brought-to-you-by-diet-coke/

There isn’t a single fatal anti-Muslim hate crime on record. Islamophobia has never killed anyone. The average anti-Muslim hate crime is committed by other Muslims.





Can a muslim be accused of islamophobia?



Certainly.   The vast majority of Muslims that get killed are killed by other Muslims.  Here, just take a look-

.    
.
Picture of the Week

It's a cute picture, but while this counter-protester was
holding up her sign in Arizona on Friday, Muslims with an
actual understanding of Islam were raping captured Yazidi
teens while forcing them to recite verses from the Quran.
There are four different places in the Quran authorizing
Muslim men to keep women as sex slaves, but not once
does it say that Allah (or "Islam") loves non-believers.
(Read what the Quran really says about non-Muslims here).


Islam's Latest Contributions to Peace "Mohammed is God's apostle.  Those who follow him are harsh
 to the unbelievers but merciful to one another"  Quran 48:29

2015.06.03 (Giza, Egypt) - Fundamentalists on motorcycles shoot two guards to death near the pyramids.
2015.06.02 (Maiduguri, Nigeria) - Islamists hide a bomb under a table at a meat market that claims the lives of about fifty innocents.
2015.06.02 (Deir Ezzor, Syria) - A woman is stoned to death for adultery.
2015.06.01 (Jadaa, Iraq) - A mass grave is discovered containing the victims of eighty Yazidi religious minorities butchered by the Islamic State, including thirty-three children and twenty women.
2015.06.01 (Ramadi, Iraq) - A coordinated attack by three ISIS suicide bombers leaves forty-seven Iraqi soldiers dead.
2015.05.31 (Kamoke, Pakistan) - A man and his son are among three election workers machine-gunned by the Tehreek-e-Taliban.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373

Interesting article about pseudo and contrived victimization.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/dgreenfield/the-islamophobia-revolution-will-be-brought-to-you-by-diet-coke/

There isn’t a single fatal anti-Muslim hate crime on record. Islamophobia has never killed anyone. The average anti-Muslim hate crime is committed by other Muslims.





Can a muslim be accused of islamophobia?




The Sunnis can't be. They are downright, absolutely too peaceful.    Grin
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon

Interesting article about pseudo and contrived victimization.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/dgreenfield/the-islamophobia-revolution-will-be-brought-to-you-by-diet-coke/

There isn’t a single fatal anti-Muslim hate crime on record. Islamophobia has never killed anyone. The average anti-Muslim hate crime is committed by other Muslims.





Can a muslim be accused of islamophobia?


hero member
Activity: 617
Merit: 500
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
....
You probably have no knowledge in Quran and simply say what the media says or just read a Translated copy of Quran made with Googl translation or something because Quran have no active violence directives at all . Islam is a peaceful religion, also we go back to the Taliban , Al Qaeda & ISIS which are all made by CIA or MI6 or Mossad (or all of them) leaders are made by those intelligence agencies then they recruit some fucked up retarded people who don't know anything about Islam and that's how it works . why ? well they simply don't like Islam because it's peaceful and they want to destroy muslim countries and take oil (Lybia , Iraq) now attacks on Arabic Saoudia etc ...
If this were actually true, then going back prior to 1940 or so, Muslim countries were all peaceful.

Wait, oh, they weren't? 

No, they weren't.  Not through their entire history, they weren't.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
Since the Quran has a number of active violence directives within it, who is the person who has the right to deny the violent Muslims when they express that they are Muslims?

After all, even the peaceful Muslims suggest that the violence in the Quran is merely defensive. And isn't this the thing that the violent Muslims are saying as well? Aren't they saying that they are defending their lands and people and religion through their violence? What gives the peaceful Muslims the right to deny the violent Muslims the right to use their defensive violence, since the peaceful Muslims also cling to the idea of the use of defensive violence?

No!  Rather, block Islam from expanding. Block it before the violence acts on you.

Smiley

I disagree on this one mate .
You probably have no knowledge in Quran and simply say what the media says or just read a Translated copy of Quran made with Googl translation or something because Quran have no active violence directives at all . Islam is a peaceful religion, also we go back to the Taliban , Al Qaeda & ISIS which are all made by CIA or MI6 or Mossad (or all of them) leaders are made by those intelligence agencies then they recruit some fucked up retarded people who don't know anything about Islam and that's how it works . why ? well they simply don't like Islam because it's peaceful and they want to destroy muslim countries and take oil (Lybia , Iraq) now attacks on Arabic Saoudia etc ...
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
Since the Quran has a number of active violence directives within it, who is the person who has the right to deny the violent Muslims when they express that they are Muslims?

After all, even the peaceful Muslims suggest that the violence in the Quran is merely defensive. And isn't this the thing that the violent Muslims are saying as well? Aren't they saying that they are defending their lands and people and religion through their violence? What gives the peaceful Muslims the right to deny the violent Muslims the right to use their defensive violence, since the peaceful Muslims also cling to the idea of the use of defensive violence?

No!  Rather, block Islam from expanding. Block it before the violence acts on you.

Smiley

I disagree on this one mate .
You probably have no knowledge in Quran and simply say what the media says or just read a Translated copy of Quran made with Googl translation or something because Quran have no active violence directives at all . Islam is a peaceful religion, also we go back to the Taliban , Al Qaeda & ISIS which are all made by CIA or MI6 or Mossad (or all of them) leaders are made by those intelligence agencies then they recruit some fucked up retarded people who don't know anything about Islam and that's how it works . why ? well they simply don't like Islam because it's peaceful and they want to destroy muslim countries and take oil (Lybia , Iraq) now attacks on Arabic Saoudia etc ...

I disagree on this one, mate.

While the percentage of violence writing in the Quran and Hadiths might be small, it is in the form of directives. In other words, it says "Do it," and tells when it is proper to do it, and to whom to do it and not to do it.

Perhaps the words are truly designed for defense only. Perhaps the passages only say to do violence to those who do it to you first. But it doesn't look like it. Rather, it looks like there is a bit of active violence to spread Islam when necessary.

You tell me. In the examples listed below, is the wording violence wording? Is it active or passive? Is it offensive or defensive? Does it exist or does it not exist?

I haven't included any of the italicization from the website in the quote below. Because of this it is difficult to tell what parts are Islam writings, and which parts are explanation and description. Go to the site if you want to see the detail. If Islam is truly a peaceful religion, it is very unfortunate that the words listed look like violence to many. But they really do. From http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm:
Quote
Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing...

but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful.   And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone.  But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)"  (Translation is from the Noble Quran)  The verse prior to this (190) refers to "fighting for the cause of Allah those who fight you" leading some to believe that the entire passage refers to a defensive war in which Muslims are defending their homes and families.  The historical context of this passage is not defensive warfare, however, since Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan adversaries.  In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did).  Verse 190 thus means to fight those who offer resistance to Allah's rule (ie. Muslim conquest).  The use of the word "persecution" by some Muslim translators is disingenuous (the actual Arabic words for persecution - "idtihad" - and oppression - a variation of "z-l-m" - do not appear in the verse).  The word used instead, "fitna",  can mean disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation.  This is certainly what is meant in this context since the violence is explicitly commissioned "until religion is for Allah" - ie. unbelievers desist in their unbelief.

 

Quran (2:244) - "Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things."

 

Quran (2:216) - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not."  Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time.  From the Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans for loot.

 

Quran (3:56) - "As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help."

 

Quran (3:151) - "Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority".  This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be 'joining companions to Allah').

 

Quran (4:74) - "Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward."  The martyrs of Islam are unlike the early Christians, who were led meekly to the slaughter.  These Muslims are killed in battle as they attempt to inflict death and destruction for the cause of Allah.  This is the theological basis for today's suicide bombers.

 

Quran (4:76) - "Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…"

 

Quran (4:89) - "They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks."

 

Quran (4:95) - "Not equal are those of the believers who sit (at home), except those who are disabled (by injury or are blind or lame, etc.), and those who strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with their wealth and their lives. Allah has preferred in grades those who strive hard and fight with their wealth and their lives above those who sit (at home). Unto each, Allah has promised good (Paradise), but Allah has preferred those who strive hard and fight, above those who sit (at home) by a huge reward "  This passage criticizes "peaceful" Muslims who do not join in the violence, letting them know that they are less worthy in Allah's eyes.  It also demolishes the modern myth that "Jihad" doesn't mean holy war in the Quran, but rather a spiritual struggle.  Not only is this Arabic word (mujahiduna) used in this passage, but it is clearly not referring to anything spiritual, since the physically disabled are given exemption.  (The Hadith reveals the context of the passage to be in response to a blind man's protest that he is unable to engage in Jihad, which would not make sense if it meant an internal struggle).  According to the verse, Allah will allow the disabled into Paradise, but will provide a larger reward to those who are able to kill others in his cause.

 

Quran (4:104) - "And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain..."  Is pursuing an injured and retreating enemy really an act of self-defense?

 

Quran (5:33) - "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement"

 

Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them"  No reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle.

 

Quran (8:15) - "O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them. (16)Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless maneuvering for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey's end."

 

Quran (8:39) - "And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion should be only for Allah"  Some translations interpret "fitna" as "persecution", but the traditional understanding of this word is not supported by the historical context (See notes for  2:193).  The Meccans were simply refusing Muhammad access to their city during Haj.  Other Muslims were allowed to travel there - just not as an armed group, since Muhammad had declared war on Mecca prior to his eviction.  The Meccans were also acting in defense of their religion, since it was Muhammad's intention to destroy their idols and establish Islam by force (which he later did).  Hence the critical part of this verse is to fight until "religion is only for Allah", meaning that the true justification of violence was the unbelief of the opposition.  According to the Sira (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 324) Muhammad further explains that "Allah must have no rivals."

 

Quran (8:57) - "If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember."  

 

Quran (8:67) - "It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he had made a great slaughter in the land..."

 

Quran (8:59-60) - "And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah's Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape.  Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy."

 

Quran (8:65) - "O Prophet, exhort the believers to fight..."

 

Quran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them."  According to this verse, the best way of staying safe from Muslim violence is to convert to Islam (prayer (salat) and the poor tax (zakat) are among the religion's Five Pillars).  This popular claim that the Quran only inspires violence within the context of self-defense is seriously challenged by this passage as well, since the Muslims to whom it was written were obviously not under attack.  Had they been, then there would have been no waiting period (earlier verses make it a duty for Muslims to fight in self-defense, even during the sacred months).  The historical context is Mecca after the idolaters were subjugated by Muhammad and posed no threat.  Once the Muslims had power, they violently evicted those unbelievers who would not convert.

 

Quran (9:14) - "Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people." Humiliating and hurting non-believers not only has the blessing of Allah, but it is ordered as a means of carrying out his punishment and even "healing" the hearts of Muslims.

 

Quran (9:20) - "Those who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah's way are of much greater worth in Allah's sight. These are they who are triumphant."  The Arabic word interpreted as "striving" in this verse is the same root as "Jihad".  The context is obviously holy war.

 

Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."  "People of the Book" refers to Christians and Jews.  According to this verse, they are to be violently subjugated, with the sole justification being their religious status.  Verse 9:33 tells Muslims that Allah has charted them to make Islam "superior over all religions." This chapter was one of the final "revelations" from Allah and it set in motion the tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad's companions managed to conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in the next 100 years.  Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths.


Quran (9:30) - "And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!"

 

Quran (9:38-39) - "O ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place."  This is a warning to those who refuse to fight, that they will be punished with Hell.

 

Quran (9:41) - "Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew."  See also the verse that follows (9:42) - "If there had been immediate gain (in sight), and the journey easy, they would (all) without doubt have followed thee, but the distance was long, (and weighed) on them"  This contradicts the myth that Muslims are to fight only in self-defense, since the wording implies that battle will be waged a long distance from home (in another country and on Christian soil, in this case, according to the historians).


Quran (9:73) - "O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination."  Dehumanizing those who reject Islam, by reminding Muslims that unbelievers are merely firewood for Hell, makes it easier to justify slaughter.  It also explains why today's devout Muslims have little regard for those outside the faith.

 

Quran (9:88) - "But the Messenger, and those who believe with him, strive and fight with their wealth and their persons: for them are (all) good things: and it is they who will prosper."


Quran (9:111) - "Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme."  How does the Quran define a true believer?

 

Quran (9:123) - "O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness."

 

Quran (17:16) - "And when We wish to destroy a town, We send Our commandment to the people of it who lead easy lives, but they transgress therein; thus the word proves true against it, so We destroy it with utter destruction."  Note that the crime is moral transgression, and the punishment is "utter destruction."  (Before ordering the 9/11 attacks, Osama bin Laden first issued Americans an invitation to Islam).

 

Quran (18:65-81) - This parable lays the theological groundwork for honor killings, in which a family member is murdered because they brought shame to the family, either through apostasy or perceived moral indiscretion.  The story (which is not found in any Jewish or Christian source) tells of Moses encountering a man with "special knowledge" who does things which don't seem to make sense on the surface, but are then justified according to later explanation.  One such action is to murder a youth for no apparent reason (74).  However, the wise man later explains that it was feared that the boy would "grieve" his parents by "disobedience and ingratitude."  He was killed so that Allah could provide them a 'better' son.  (Note: This is one reason why honor killing is sanctioned by Sharia.  Reliance of the Traveler (Umdat al-Saliq) says that punishment for murder is not applicable when a parent or grandparent kills their offspring (o.1.1-2).)

 

Quran (21:44) - "We gave the good things of this life to these men and their fathers until the period grew long for them; See they not that We gradually reduce the land (in their control) from its outlying borders? Is it then they who will win?"

 

Quran (25:52) - "Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness..."   "Strive against" is Jihad - obviously not in the personal context.  It's also significant to point out that this is a Meccan verse.

 

Quran (33:60-62) - "If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while.  Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter."   This passage sanctions the slaughter (rendered "merciless" and "horrible murder" in other translations) against three groups: Hypocrites (Muslims who refuse to "fight in the way of Allah" (3:167) and hence don't act as Muslims should), those with "diseased hearts" (which include Jews and Christians 5:51-52), and "alarmists" or "agitators who include those who merely speak out against Islam, according to Muhammad's biographers.  It is worth noting that the victims are to be sought out by Muslims, which is what today's terrorists do.  If this passage is meant merely to apply to the city of Medina, then it is unclear why it is included in Allah's eternal word to Muslim generations.

 

Quran (47:3-4) - "Those who disbelieve follow falsehood, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord... So, when you meet (in fight Jihad in Allah's Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives)... If it had been Allah's Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost."  Those who reject Allah are to be killed in Jihad.  The wounded are to be held captive for ransom.  The only reason Allah doesn't do the dirty work himself is to to test the faithfulness of Muslims.  Those who kill pass the test.

 

Quran (47:35) - "Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost (Shakir: "have the upper hand") for Allah is with you,"  

 

Quran (48:17) - "There is no blame for the blind, nor is there blame for the lame, nor is there blame for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah and His messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers flow; and whoso turneth back, him will He punish with a painful doom."  Contemporary apologists sometimes claim that Jihad means 'spiritual struggle.'  Is so, then why are the blind, lame and sick exempted?  This verse also says that those who do not fight will suffer torment in hell.

 

Quran (48:29) - "Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves"  Islam is not about treating everyone equally.  This verse tells Muslims that there are two very distinct standards that are applied based on religious status.  Also the word used for 'hard' or 'ruthless' in this verse shares the same root as the word translated as 'painful' or severe' to describe Hell in over 25 other verses including 65:10, 40:46 and 50:26..

 

Quran (61:4) - "Surely Allah loves those who fight in His way"  Religion of Peace, indeed! The verse explicitly refers to "battle array" meaning that it is speaking of physical conflict.  This is followed by (61:9): "He it is who has sent His Messenger (Mohammed) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam) to make it victorious over all religions even though the infidels may resist."  (See next verse, below).  Infidels who resist Islamic rule are to be fought.

 

Quran (61:10-12) - "O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment. That you believe in Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know! (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of 'Adn - Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success."  This verse refers to physical battle in order to make Islam victorious over other religions (see above).  It uses the Arabic word, Jihad.

 

Quran (66:9) - "O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey's end."  The root word of "Jihad" is used again here.  The context is clearly holy war, and the scope of violence is broadened to include "hypocrites" - those who call themselves Muslims but do not act as such.
Quote
Bukhari (52:177) - Allah's Apostle said, "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him."

 

Bukhari (52:256) - The Prophet... was asked whether it was permissible to attack the pagan warriors at night with the probability of exposing their women and children to danger. The Prophet replied, "They (i.e. women and children) are from them (i.e. pagans)."  In this command, Muhammad establishes that it is permissible to kill non-combatants in the process of killing a perceived enemy.  This provides justification for the many Islamic terror bombings.

 

Bukhari (52:65) - The Prophet said, 'He who fights that Allah's Word, Islam, should be superior, fights in Allah's Cause.  Muhammad's words are the basis for offensive Jihad - spreading Islam by force.  This is how it was understood by his companions, and by the terrorists of today.  

 

Bukhari (52:220) - Allah's Apostle said... 'I have been made victorious with terror'

 

Abu Dawud (14:2526) - The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Three things are the roots of faith: to refrain from (killing) a person who utters, "There is no god but Allah" and not to declare him unbeliever whatever sin he commits, and not to excommunicate him from Islam for his any action; and jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist)

 

Abu Dawud (14:2527) - The Prophet said: Striving in the path of Allah (jihad) is incumbent on you along with every ruler, whether he is pious or impious

 

Muslim (1:33) - the Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah

 

Bukhari (8:387) - Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah'.  And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally."

 

Muslim (1:30) - "The Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah."

 

Bukhari (52:73) - "Allah's Apostle said, 'Know that Paradise is under the shades of swords'."

 

Bukhari (11:626) - [Muhammad said:] "I decided to order a man to lead the prayer and then take a flame to burn all those, who had not left their houses for the prayer, burning them alive inside their homes."

 

Muslim (1:149) - "Abu Dharr reported: I said: Messenger of Allah, which of the deeds is the best? He (the Holy Prophet) replied: Belief in Allah and Jihad in His cause..."

 

Muslim (20:4645) - "...He (the Messenger of Allah) did that and said: There is another act which elevates the position of a man in Paradise to a grade one hundred (higher), and the elevation between one grade and the other is equal to the height of the heaven from the earth. He (Abu Sa'id) said: What is that act? He replied: Jihad in the way of Allah! Jihad in the way of Allah!"

 

Muslim (20:4696) - "the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: 'One who died but did not fight in the way of Allah nor did he express any desire (or determination) for Jihad died the death of a hypocrite.'"

 

Muslim (19:4321-4323) - Three separate hadith in which Muhammad shrugs over the news that innocent children were killed in a raid by his men against unbelievers.  His response: "They are of them (meaning the enemy)."

 

Muslim (19:4294) - "When the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) appointed anyone as leader of an army or detachment he would especially exhort him... He would say: Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war...  When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these, you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them... If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah's help and fight them."

 

Bukhari 1:35  "The person who participates in (Holy Battles) in Allah’s cause and nothing compels him do so except belief in Allah and His Apostle, will be recompensed by Allah either with a reward, or booty ( if he survives) or will be admitted to Paradise ( if he is killed)."

 

Tabari 7:97  The morning after the murder of Ashraf, the Prophet declared, "Kill any Jew who falls under your power."  Ashraf was a poet, killed by Muhammad's men because he insulted Islam.  Here, Muhammad widens the scope of his orders to kill.  An innocent Jewish businessman was then slain by his Muslim partner, merely for being non-Muslim.

 

Tabari 9:69  "Killing Unbelievers is a small matter to us"  The words of Muhammad, prophet of Islam.

 

Tabari 17:187  "'By God, our religion (din) from which we have departed is better and more correct than that which these people follow. Their religion does not stop them from shedding blood, terrifying the roads, and seizing properties.' And they returned to their former religion."  The words of a group of Christians who had converted to Islam, but realized their error after being shocked by the violence and looting committed in the name of Allah.  The price of their decision to return to a religion of peace was that the men were beheaded and the woman and children enslaved by the caliph Ali.

 

Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 484: - “Allah said, ‘A prophet must slaughter before collecting captives. A slaughtered enemy is driven from the land. Muhammad, you craved the desires of this world, its goods and the ransom captives would bring. But Allah desires killing them to manifest the religion.’”

 

Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 990: - Lest anyone think that cutting off someone's head while screaming 'Allah Akbar!' is a modern creation, here is an account of that very practice under Muhammad, who seems to approve.

 

Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 992: - "Fight everyone in the way of Allah and kill those who disbelieve in Allah."  Muhammad's instructions to his men prior to a military raid.

 

Saifur Rahman, The Sealed Nectar p.227-228 - "Embrace Islam... If you two accept Islam, you will remain in command of your country; but if your refuse my Call, you’ve got to remember that all of your possessions are perishable. My horsemen will appropriate your land, and my Prophethood will assume preponderance over your kingship."  One of several letters from Muhammad to rulers of other countries.  The significance is that the recipients were not making war or threatening Muslims.  Their subsequent defeat and subjugation by Muhammad's armies was justified merely on the basis of their unbelief.



Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1135
Merit: 1001
The media and a group of people really think that a flight attendant wanting to open a diet coke for a Muslim woman is already a hate crime

She is really making an issue about the flight attendant giving an unopened can to another passenger.
Discrimination based on religion, according to the Muslim woman.

How is that already considered a discrimination? And where is the discrimination in there? In the can of diet coke? There are a lot of issues towards hate and racism that should be focused and be on the headlines rather than a silly coke issue. How about the human trafficking scene? There are loads of issues, more important than this can of diet coke issue.

How is it not discrimination? The flight attendant didn't have any problem with the other passengers. Gave one an unopened can of beer in front of the muslim woman. Funny the article didn't say anything about that. Or about the other passenger's reactions. And how one insulted her and repeated that she would use the can as a weapon: http://rt.com/usa/263653-united-airlines-muslim-coke
staff
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6152
Since the Quran has a number of active violence directives within it, who is the person who has the right to deny the violent Muslims when they express that they are Muslims?

After all, even the peaceful Muslims suggest that the violence in the Quran is merely defensive. And isn't this the thing that the violent Muslims are saying as well? Aren't they saying that they are defending their lands and people and religion through their violence? What gives the peaceful Muslims the right to deny the violent Muslims the right to use their defensive violence, since the peaceful Muslims also cling to the idea of the use of defensive violence?

No!  Rather, block Islam from expanding. Block it before the violence acts on you.

Smiley

I disagree on this one mate .
You probably have no knowledge in Quran and simply say what the media says or just read a Translated copy of Quran made with Googl translation or something because Quran have no active violence directives at all . Islam is a peaceful religion, also we go back to the Taliban , Al Qaeda & ISIS which are all made by CIA or MI6 or Mossad (or all of them) leaders are made by those intelligence agencies then they recruit some fucked up retarded people who don't know anything about Islam and that's how it works . why ? well they simply don't like Islam because it's peaceful and they want to destroy muslim countries and take oil (Lybia , Iraq) now attacks on Arabic Saoudia etc ...
legendary
Activity: 3542
Merit: 1352
Cashback 15%
The media and a group of people really think that a flight attendant wanting to open a diet coke for a Muslim woman is already a hate crime

She is really making an issue about the flight attendant giving an unopened can to another passenger.
Discrimination based on religion, according to the Muslim woman.

How is that already considered a discrimination? And where is the discrimination in there? In the can of diet coke? There are a lot of issues towards hate and racism that should be focused and be on the headlines rather than a silly coke issue. How about the human trafficking scene? There are loads of issues, more important than this can of diet coke issue.
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
The media and a group of people really think that a flight attendant wanting to open a diet coke for a Muslim woman is already a hate crime

She is really making an issue about the flight attendant giving an unopened can to another passenger.
Discrimination based on religion, according to the Muslim woman.
Pages:
Jump to: