Pages:
Author

Topic: Its not fair that yobit got banned - page 2. (Read 617 times)

hero member
Activity: 2366
Merit: 866
June 14, 2019, 10:27:37 AM
#13
They basically told people on their exchange (announcement via Twitter) to come here and spam for a few $.

They had no manager, they had no spreadsheets, they had nothing but a signature that users could put on and post away. No bueno and if they launch something like it again I hope they get a perma ban!

I never understand one thing about Yobit.  They had so much money to pay reasonable rates to almost everyone who joins them. Why can't they spent some money to hire a proper manager from here and start their campaign. If they ever do so, considering the funds they have, it would be the biggest campaign i suppose.
member
Activity: 62
Merit: 41
June 14, 2019, 10:19:02 AM
#12
There wasnt even 48 hours given to yobit for them to ban the spammers.
Spammers were banned because they had at least one good report against them, IIRC.

Are you seriously advocating for spam?
legendary
Activity: 3570
Merit: 1959
June 14, 2019, 09:16:42 AM
#11
It's a shit exchange, I wish they would get hacked or just disappear. Shit coin heaven, just like Binance, IMO....  Tongue

He should just ban all yobit sig campaigns here in the future and kill that stake.com bullshit as well... Roll Eyes
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 155
June 14, 2019, 09:13:23 AM
#10
The fact is Yobit account was inactively in the forum for year, more than one year (not sure exactly how long that account was inactively). At the day Yobit campaign started, that account even was not actively again. Yobit only logged in the account when people complained about Yobit campaign, but interestingly there is no official announcement made by Yobit. They keep silently, and campaign announced in the forum by low rank account (Junior Member or even lower, maybe from community, and not from Yobit side). BPIP site is down, at the moment, but you can check later the day Yobit account woke up.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
June 14, 2019, 09:12:17 AM
#9
There wasnt even 48 hours given to yobit for them to ban the spammers.

I think it lasted for more than 48 hours. It started on April 19 and was banned on the 22nd. There were multiple threads about it. I know I was scraping the participant list and it was growing by the hour. It's not like they didn't know what they were doing. I even contacted Yobit to warn them about it, as I'm sure others did too. Yobit exhibited zero care.

In 3 days it grew to be far worse than Stake in 3 months but if Stake doesn't start managing their campaign properly they should be banned too. I still don't trust Steve's arrogant "look we're so nice we're doing something we should have done months ago" attitude.
legendary
Activity: 2996
Merit: 6138
Meh.
June 14, 2019, 08:25:28 AM
#8
They basically told people on their exchange (announcement via Twitter) to come here and spam for a few $.

They had no manager, they had no spreadsheets, they had nothing but a signature that users could put on and post away. No bueno and if they launch something like it again I hope they get a perma ban!
legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 3038
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
June 14, 2019, 07:19:14 AM
#7
There ban is up in 8 days. I want to know what is to stop them from getting banned again.

If the spam is the same then I'm sure they'll get another ban with a longer duration.


I am sure the spam will be the same, but if you do not give them 48 hours to ban the spammers from participating in the campaign how is that even fair?

I bet they bann people and the people don't even realize they are banned and still contirune to post

Well I wasn't involved in the ban nor can I give them, but I agree they should be given a warning first and a grace period to sort things out and that's one of the things I included in the Signature Campaign Guidelines but they were never enforced. I think people did try to contact Yobit also but their account had been inactive for quite some time if I recall correctly (but I could be wrong).

~snip~
Stake isn't much better but I would support a Stake ban if they don't clean up their campaign asap.
Lately they have taken the steps. They made a post in the reputation section about the update.
Stake.com Signature Campaign - A new kind of future New

Yeah, I just saw that. Looks good so hopefully Steve can keep on top of things now.

They said they didn’t accept people with red trust, but somehow, they were still able to join, and atleast given the impression that they were getting paid for their posts (Although im pretty certain they were actually getting paid. See mdayonliners post history where he put up some screenshots of him getting paid (IIRC).)

Yobit added balance to their yobit account just like they did to non-redtrusted users.



Mday was proof that negative trust users were getting paid. It was pretty much open season when that campaign came back because anyone and everyone could sign up and that's why it was abused so quickly. I'm sure account farmers and multi-accounters also quickly took advantage and that's what happens when you have no active manager.
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1427
June 14, 2019, 06:42:57 AM
#6
There ban is up in 8 days. I want to know what is to stop them from getting banned again.

If the spam is the same then I'm sure they'll get another ban with a longer duration.


I am sure the spam will be the same, but if you do not give them 48 hours to ban the spammers from participating in the campaign how is that even fair?

I bet they bann people and the people don't even realize they are banned and still contirune to post
Not really though. They didn’t communicate at all as far as i’m aware, and only ran a signature campaign to promote their IEO token spam.

They said they didn’t accept people with red trust, but somehow, they were still able to join, and atleast given the impression that they were getting paid for their posts (Although im pretty certain they were actually getting paid. See mdayonliners post history where he put up some screenshots of him getting paid (IIRC).)

Yobit added balance to their yobit account just like they did to non-redtrusted users.

sr. member
Activity: 882
Merit: 301
June 14, 2019, 06:41:10 AM
#5
How many weeks has it been since the Yobit sig campaign and its participants were banned?
That 20 posts per day for Yobit was just too much imo.
I don't know about Stake but I've seen many complaints already but their campaign manager recently asked for help to report spammers. That's probably one reason why it is still allowed.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
June 14, 2019, 06:39:42 AM
#4
~snip~
Stake isn't much better but I would support a Stake ban if they don't clean up their campaign asap.
Lately they have taken the steps. They made a post in the reputation section about the update.
Stake.com Signature Campaign - A new kind of future New
hero member
Activity: 2254
Merit: 960
100% Deposit Match UP TO €5000!
June 14, 2019, 06:28:00 AM
#3
There ban is up in 8 days. I want to know what is to stop them from getting banned again.

If the spam is the same then I'm sure they'll get another ban with a longer duration.


I am sure the spam will be the same, but if you do not give them 48 hours to ban the spammers from participating in the campaign how is that even fair?

I bet they bann people and the people don't even realize they are banned and still contirune to post
legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 3038
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
June 14, 2019, 06:22:23 AM
#2
I thought this was supposed to be a decentralized fourm,

It's not. Never has been. It's a centralised forum with rules and anyone can be banned for breaking them.

There ban is up in 8 days. I want to know what is to stop them from getting banned again.

If the spam is the same then I'm sure they'll get another ban with a longer duration.

Whats the difference between the spam from stake and the spam from yobit?

Yobit spam was far more intense and has easily been the worst campaign the forum has seen for quite some time, but the damage they did in such a short amount of time was ridiculous. They had no manager at all and accepted anyone and as such it was quickly exploited. Stake isn't much better but I would support a Stake ban if they don't clean up their campaign asap.
hero member
Activity: 2254
Merit: 960
100% Deposit Match UP TO €5000!
June 14, 2019, 05:59:08 AM
#1
I thought this was supposed to be a decentralized fourm, but because the mass majority cannot offer rates as good as yobit signature campaign it leads to everyone switching to them, and posting a lot.


There ban is up in 8 days. I want to know what is to stop them from getting banned again.


Whats the difference between the spam from stake and the spam from yobit?

There wasnt even 48 hours given to yobit for them to ban the spammers.
Pages:
Jump to: