~
On behalf of the forum let me thank you for the privilege to host your esteemed advertisers. It was an amazing once-in-a-lifetime (hopefully) opportunity.
Thanks for all of your support along the way
Topic: Stake.com Signature Campaign - A new kind of future (Read 2173 times)
On behalf of the forum let me thank you for the privilege to host your esteemed advertisers. It was an amazing once-in-a-lifetime (hopefully) opportunity.
Thanks for all of your support along the way
~
On behalf of the forum let me thank you for the privilege to host your esteemed advertisers. It was an amazing once-in-a-lifetime (hopefully) opportunity.
It's silly to make changes and then shut down the campaign. Looks like they couldn't even take criticism and try to work on their campaign rules to run a smooth campaign. The message also sounds so immature that they can't do anything to make everyone happy.
Here's a good example of exactly what I'm talking about. I close the campaign and still someone finds a way to be truly upset. People are now upset over a campaign that no longer exists. I can't make everyone happy when there's an entire forum telling me what I have to do with my own campaign. Even after the last change I was getting more complaints than ever so I don't mind just closing it because signature space has little value at the end of the day anyways. It was good before but what does it mean when majority of people here are only here to try and make money off their signature? There's endless campaigns to join now and for each new one that opens up they all lose a little value and get lost a little more in the crowd of signatures.
It's silly to make changes and then shut down the campaign. Looks like they couldn't even take criticism and try to work on their campaign rules to run a smooth campaign. The message also sounds so immature that they can't do anything to make everyone happy.
global moderator
Activity: 3794
Merit: 2615
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
This campaign is officially closed.
Its sad that despite all the good efforts this campaign got closed. I already told that the Gang will not allow this campaign to run by another manager.
That's the purpose of the gang members, to keep the control
Its seems the the agenda is to ban the stake campaign or change the manager ( And not the fight against spam) ?
This is now going too far. Two of the things may happen soon
Either this campaign will be forcefully banned or one of you will be hired
Either this campaign will be forcefully banned or one of you will be hired
This is the conspiracy theory angle. I think most people just wanted Steve/Stake to do their job properly and stop the appalling level of spam coming from their campaign. It's a shame they shut the campaign down because the clean-up they did looked to have solved the problem but if they'd have done this from the start nobody would have had anything to complain about in the first place.
This campaign is officially closed.
Its sad that despite all the good efforts this campaign got closed. I already told that the Gang will not allow this campaign to run by another manager.
That's the purpose of the gang members, to keep the control
Its seems the the agenda is to ban the stake campaign or change the manager ( And not the fight against spam) ?
This is now going too far. Two of the things may happen soon
Either this campaign will be forcefully banned or one of you will be hired
Either this campaign will be forcefully banned or one of you will be hired
The thread was updated to "closed" but there was no official statement from steve so I presume that they would close the old thread to create a new one.
Its gone mate... There was an update on the Telegram group. Unfortunetly the new update says that this campaign closed
This campaign is officially closed.
Its sad that despite all the good efforts this campaign got closed. I already told that the Gang will not allow this campaign to run by another manager.That's the purpose of the gang members, to keep the control Sad
I already told that the Gang will not allow this campaign to run by another manager.
That's the purpose of the gang members, to keep the control
I'll bite: who's "the Gang", and how did they get to Stunna? He doesn't strike me as the guy who's afraid of "the Gang". I asked Stunna to check the thread 4 months ago. Does that make me part of "the Gang"?That's the purpose of the gang members, to keep the control
I'm a bit surprised though to see it closed this quickly, after the changes made to improve the campaign.
This campaign is officially closed.
Its sad that despite all the good efforts this campaign got closed. I already told that the Gang will not allow this campaign to run by another manager.
That's the purpose of the gang members, to keep the control
Its seems the the agenda is to ban the stake campaign or change the manager ( And not the fight against spam) ?
This is now going too far. Two of the things may happen soon
Either this campaign will be forcefully banned or one of you will be hired
Either this campaign will be forcefully banned or one of you will be hired
Yes, the company, of course, has flaws, but Steve is working on it. Let's be a little more indulgent so that a person would not have lost the desire to be a manager
Despite having corrected the many issues, let's not start spouting falsities. The fault was not with the company... Stake delegated the responsibility of campaign management to Steve. The spam was his responsibility.Now that he's changed to more restrictive requirements, this is better. But don't act like Steve did nothing wrong.
I work with Steve not so long ago, but as a manager, he completely suits me. He makes timely payments, actively and quickly answers questions. Steve is really not indifferent to the participants of the company, he sincerely tries to make the company accessible to everyone without restrictions, gives the opportunity to participate to those who speak English poorly (in most other companies, posts on local boards don't count). Yes, the company, of course, has flaws, but Steve is working on it. Let's be a little more indulgent so that a person would not have lost the desire to be a manager
Why are you apologizing, you didnt even ask a question
Apologies imply questions?
actmyname- My bad. Combine a headache and mobiles screens, you'll get my stupidity. Roll Eyes
Why are you apologizing, you didnt even ask a question
No, when they announced their new signature participants, there are 27 people and still same until now. Look more carefully, there is no one placed on row no. 1, as franckuestein placed on row no.2
My bad. Combine a headache and mobiles screens, you'll get my stupidity. 
The issue of paying all users the same is a different approach but I can't say the reasoning behind it is no good. Great point with the fact that no matter the rank a Newbie could be a better poster than a Legendary.
Users have just always seen pay increases the higher the rank. Kinda like they earned the right to earn more. They have put in the work to rank up. Now more then ever because it's so hard for some to get those golden merits.
I will usually read the posts from people who produce higher-quality content, anyway. The signature has nothing to do with it: if you can't get me to the page, then it doesn't matter how nice your signature might look.Users have just always seen pay increases the higher the rank. Kinda like they earned the right to earn more. They have put in the work to rank up. Now more then ever because it's so hard for some to get those golden merits.
The key point to consider is that though some users may not have a high rank at the moment, the bottleneck may not be merit but rather activity. If there are consistent and polished replies posted by a user then certainly they deserve as much as they could be getting had they began posting earlier. I would almost call this analogous to paying someone for their skill rather than their experience - akin to hacker ethic.
Not sure they are accepting participants or not but still they left the campaign thread as for everyone so people keep applying.
There used to be 27 (IIRC) which turned to 28. So, we know that users are still being accepted, but on a far stricter basis. Not sure they are accepting participants or not but still they left the campaign thread as for everyone so people keep applying.
There used to be 27 (IIRC) which turned to 28. So, we know that users are still being accepted, but on a far stricter basis. 
Can't see the Spreadsheet? Are they done? What I've meant is, have they quit running this Campaign? Can't also find the announcement on when they will start accepting applications.
Here you can find : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/127282xBJq5UtDH9vI8U96GNxBWN_3-3o-P6vTT44Fec/edit#gid=380619948
Not sure they are accepting participants or not but still they left the campaign thread as for everyone so people keep applying.
Can't see the Spreadsheet? Are they done? What I've meant is, have they quit running this Campaign? Can't also find the announcement on when they will start accepting applications.
The new changes in the campaign are innovative, I believe that leaving the same payment rate for all ranges not only eliminates spam, but also gives relevance to each publication that carries the stake signature, and this in turn makes the level of bitcointalk continue to increase.
Jump to: