Topic: Iungo Scammed The Bounty Hunters - page 2. (Read 1334 times)

IUNGO has new video. Feel free to add comments about it being a scam.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGUTK3Z-cjA&feature=youtu.be

The only way we will be able to compel them to honour the Bounty is by applying pressure in Social Media.
It worked when Axpire tried to scam everyone out of their bounty and it will work here, but only if we all do it.

And so gentlemen, what is our plan?

They even did not include me in the spreadsheet! I had to write support on the site and achieve the truth!

We can motivate them to do the right thing and honour their commitments if we publicly shame them in social media.

Create posts that talk about what they did scamming everyone and then share the link in this thread so we can retweet and reshare.

Here is my contribution for today.

https://twitter.com/CMRoxburgh/status/974186640225681408

https://twitter.com/CMRoxburgh/status/974188136149368832

Hello dear Bitcointalk members, I write this message here and spend my time not to call to account the dishonest organizers of bounty Incugu in my opinion, but though to save people from investing in this project now. The thread of the bounty manager was closed right after the end of the ICO,not one person did not have time to ask even the question of the distribution of bounty, the table was not maintained by the manager at all, there was not recorded and calculated no rate for the entire bounty company. Payouts look like a mockery - all these facts rather point to a plan originally planned and not for the forse magor.
I would not advise such people to trust their money. The only thing I really want is that people believe in cripto, but if such things are left unattended by the bitcointalk administration, very soon there will be many similar projects. Thank you for attention

That is not enough a good reason to breach an agreement between you and the people you hired to do a job for you. If they actually wanted to prevent dumping of the token, there are avalanche of ways of achieving that; like delaying the payment until the market stabilizes, performing payouts in batches, mixing up payment of bounty hunters with big stakes with that of people with small stakes etc.
I have seen some projects give same reason for not paying out the exact amount stipulated for bounties after end of the bounty events that it is starting to seem like its normal.

But if they actually made a disclaimer on the possibility of reviewing the payment at wish and at any given time before commencing the bounty event,  then I do not see anything wrong with that.

All the same,  I wouldn't support OP trying to drag the whole project down because of this little ruse that can be discussed over and settled amicably. Because trying to drag the project down will be more work than the bounty task he's complaining of being cheated on
By the way,  I participated in the bounty also.

Is the McGregor (from the link you supplied and I followed it to discover the OP of that thread) guy truly a member of the scamming team  as alleged? I am going over to draw his attention to this.

Report this to the moderator or to the Meta session so that the guys get their red painting.

Come on, don't be naive. An agreement is an agreement. It should stand that way except it is conditionally stated in the beginning that a reduction may occur later. Without that, changing rules if engagement at the end is a breach and should be seen as a scam.

They should have paid you about 1500 then since they are paying out about 8%.
We will get them to pay the full amount but it will take everyone working together posting on social media about them being scammers .

I was their Chinese translator and was only paid 120 tokens. What a joke and insult.

They can be persuaded to honour the original bounty agreement but it will require that all of us who worked on the bounty campaign now apply pressure in social media to get them to do the right thing. We did it with Axpire when they tried to rip everyone off but once they realised that their unethical behaviour was going to cost them they agreed to pay everyone what they were owed.

Go to their social media channels and post about how they ripped off everyone who worked on the bounty. Use the #Scam #ICO #IUNGO #iungonetwork and link it back to this thread.

Here are some links to get you started.

Social Media

https://twitter.com/IUNGOnetwork
https://www.facebook.com/IUNGOnetwork/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/iungo-network/
https://web.telegram.org/#/im?p=@IUNGO
https://www.reddit.com/r/iungo/
https://medium.com/@iungo
https://medium.com/@richbe
https://steemit.com/@iungonetwork

Contact people on their team and ask them why they are choosing to associate themselves with scammers.

https://iungo.network/#team

Once they realise that we are not going away they will pay.

It is also a shame that trusted members which are giving negative trust every little shit out there is not even commenting on this issue.

Summary: They offered a job, people did it. And after job is over they said they will give 1/13 of the original agreement.

They violate the rules, this is not permissible, unethical and causes complete distrust of the project. 

We need to start some activity in social media websites. Because they are really scammers.
Here one of the new project where is one of the iungo team members
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-ico-bitcoinus-ecommerce-payment-processor-2795842

It seems the community had some impact already as the price is on the decline. I really liked the idea behind the project, but stayed away when I saw their advertising on CMC.

ICO's that spending big money on advertising is a red flag for me, if you truly work on something innovative and potentially huge you should not need to create all the noise, your users or believers should do it.

Iungo did not understand that, and furthermore did not understand that early adopters and promoters of their idea should be treated like VIPs, as it is the community that can either make or brake a project.

Without early adopters you are never able to cross the casm in any new product launch. And as project you have to be loyal to your supporters and treat them as your best investors.

Iungo also did not understand that in the Crypto Sphere you can't treat people bad anymore only because they are carrying out a low wage job for you. In Crypto there is no such thing.

A bounty hunter can also be a potential investor or user. If you alienate these supporters right from the start it typically means "game over" for your project. Greed is not a good advisor, it backfires again and again.


Thanks for dropping me some merrit if you feel my posts are valuable to you.

And new HODl programme announced with:

Team of iungo deceived all bounty hunters I think that we all need to start anti-advertising this project. In the same social networks where they asked to promote them.
It is also necessary to see who they want to conclude a partnership with and write to them so they do not have to deal with this team because they are deceiving and do not fulfill their obligations.
You can not do business with iungo project.

This is bullshit. Whole post is.

Campaign rule was 1.5% and they can't change rules after ICO ended and after bounty ended just because there was less participants then expected.

Look how fair bounty look: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1S0C8-BUpRKNfMsdtjTJRb4M5kwcww1bmYXoNLij_wWI/edit#gid=395209439

See?

Look how much tokens and money bounty participants received. Some participants received tokens worth 3BTC!

Less participants mean higher reward and more tokens for participants, it doesn't work other way around!

This is stupid.
If bounty pool is $10000 and OP is only one participating then he should receive $10K

Do you think I am wrong?

What about this:
Imagine, bounty pool is $1M and there are 10000 participants. And AFTER ICO and bounty ends they change rule to 10000$ pool and every participant get 1$. According to your logic - this is not scam.

It is easiest to say "yeah, like you expected to get more money because you are only one".

That is very stupid! He should get everything promised. Don't ignore what was promised and what will be payed.

OP I know how you feel, I felt the same way when cartaxy changed rule after campaign ended and payed 5 times less tokens.

You have been scammed.

It doesn't matter how many people are complaining. One is enough.
Or do you think 400 people has to complain, because if only 1 guy complain then it is not scam? You are wrong.


To add something:

OP why are you using new account to complain? Why don't you post from your account? There is no reason to be afraid! Be a man and post from your account!

I guess you are part of the team lol. They did cut bounty in 13 times and moderators of the forum should be contacted I believe. We do not care how many people they did expect, they said 1.5% for bounty not in 13 times less and 1.5% is not much. They should put original stakes, or bounty community should show it's power

The administration of the IUNGO is just a shame, after they lowered the rates they started in telegram insult bounty hunters although everyone tried to tell them about people, I do not recommend contacting this project

I understand enough to see that yet another russian is supporting this. Which makes more more incline to believe it's one guy with multiple accounts.

Maybe forum admins should investigate if it's the same ip addresses