Topic: Ixcoin TODO - page 61. (Read 631736 times)

I'm happy to be growing on y'all.  However, let it be remembered, that not once did I ever advocate anyone put their Euros in this turd.

exactly a lightweight client maybe not a full qt , no thanks,


edit 1 sending you a pm about this crazy idea, no hurry to read or get back i don't see it happening.......  ever.........

He's actually an integral part of this thread. 

He watches this thread closely.

Missed ya Zeb.  It's funny you should join in, cause I was just talking about you and was expecting you.  

Wait, one of Ixcoin's advantages over the other scams is that it was the first one?

Put a dollar value on this project and I'll at least set my mind on it.  Maybe I'll find a way until IXC goes boom, and after that I won't be going around begging the rich for pocket change anymore.

You know how many people in crypto world know this?  Maybe 7 [TOTAL] people.

We really need to start using that as one of iXcoin's advantages and push the truth that [amongst other things] iXCoin is the OG, the original alt-coin, given NMC is totally something else and NMC is only 2 weeks older anyway.  Everyone out there literally thinks that Litecoin came after Bitcoin.  Litecoin wasn't even the first script coin. 

I wanna make Litecoin iXCoin little bitch.  Help me do that, Johnny; give me that 1,000 IXC back! Hahaha!

Dude, you're killing me.  If we get any decent iXCoin rally I'll personally pay for some of this development, I think it's Brilliant!!!

Im glad i am lol. Considering IXC has 2 devs atm who are mostly part time and unpaid. which is me and cinnamon. I'm only being realistic when i say doing something like multicoin-qt is damn near impossible.

Ahmed

Here's a thought. What is the feasibility of adding in atomic transactions with i0coin? Ie. Both i0coin and ixcoin modify their code to allow atomic transactions between each other.

Damn ahmed, youre a tough cookie, you know im not suggsting you do any more work.  It would have to be someone elses time anyway.

Atleast it costs nothing to dream. And if i wait long enough then i can prob just use jl777's instantdex, of course that will share with other non- sha256d chains but im not racist so its all good.

thanks for participating in this thought experiment though.


Ixcoin been a leader since day 1!

= not winning. that code was based on btc 0.2 or 0.3 we're now on 0.10. Even that's going to take a hell of a long time to update.

the more i read about multicoin, the more it makes me realize that the code might already be there.

namecoin and ixcoin are/were already supported. escrow is mentioned. in our case that could be shapeshift.

hmm a multicoin fork with just bitcoin, namecoin ,and ixcoin with shapeshift added in, = #winning 

it seems most of these multi wallets want to include chains that are not sha256d.

I assume you are talking about
https://github.com/ArtForz/MultiCoin-qt
(fixed bug in ixcoin config to support older versions of multicoin )

edit (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/new-release-of-multicoin-client-a-branch-of-the-bitcoin-client-24209)
The MultiCoin client is a  slightly modified and very experimental Bitcoin client that allows transactions with an unlimited number of crypto currencies block chains and also the creation of new crypto chains.   Each different crypto currency can have a different set of rules and a different root block that is controlled by settings in the MultiCoin config file.  Multicoin has also be opening up new methods of linked chains and advanced methods of transaction including escrow and multi sign transactions.

I also found
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/multicoin-wallet-roundup-multiple-altcoin-wallet-trailblazers/
07/05/2014

ALL-CoinWallet-QT Multicoin Wallet
Orca OnLine Multicoin Wallet RPC Server Controller
PHP5 Bitcoin API With Multicoin Wallet Support

also already mentioned is the supernet wallet. so obviously someone out there has had these ideas before.  fudge, i wish bitcoin would just add atomic transactions code..

bitcoin, clones itself, then merge mines its clones to itself. I'm sure a game theorist such as satoshi saw this coming and had a plan. Now what? What is that pesky bitcoin got up it's sleeve? Will bitcoin share some of those extra transactions it doesn't want? Why can't we be friends....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJTBPdVpdMc

The bugs could possibly be built out. But in the time it takes to build it out. You could pretty much build your own QT

That was years ago, you don't think the bugs can be worked out if we had the resources?  I know, that's a big IF.

Cause I think the idea is really groundbreaking if it can be done right.  TIA

there used to be a QT with bitcoin, giestgeld and a few other chains like tenebrix and fairbrix. Due to how buggy it was abandoned. It was essentially what your talking about - the deciding on the route part. It was called multicoin-qt

Ahmed

What was abandoned 3 years ago? Can you point me to a discussion?

Really, im just trying to go down a train of thought of ixcoin and bitcoin and other sha256d chains working together. Why not have some type of wallet or engine or something that routes transactions to the appropriate network? Or provide the tools for the user to do it like transaction backlog meters or meter which shows the  network with the lowest fee, etc. Im starting to see that bitcoin isn't interested in certain transactions. Dust, gambling, counterparty, etc. why not encourage them to run on the sha256d hardware network? Bitcoin is also becoming synonymous with blockchain so then bitcoinshould be thought of as the sha256d hardware network

I never implied one would need to run both qt's but i'd def rather run ixcoin.

Im thinking either a litewallet, that can do both
Or
Ixcoin blockchain with bitcoin litewallet


As an aside, regardless of how people feel about it. The supernet requires nxt and bitcoindark chains to run, or you can use their litewallet and not dl anything.


I also am putting forth the idea that maybe mastercoin omnicoin copies itself to ixcoin and i0coin and the three mastercore engines talk to each other.

Id love to hear what you have to say about the merge mining coins working together ahmed.

True.

But what's gonna happen next year when BTC has 8mb-20mb blocks and a much more massive chain?  What about in 2-3 years?

They'll figure out a way to work with "lite" wallets or some other solution for a huge chain.

If Bitcoin is gonna be ok then we have to assume we can do it and just go for it, get the jump on all the rest.  We have massive partners in China that can really push this through for us, I'm certain of that - even if I have to go to Beijing myself.

The potential for a dual wallet, especially if we can become the fast lane for Bitcoin, is ENORMOUS!

Keep it coming, Johnny be Good!  lol