but its nice to know you admit now that you feel its ok to have unbacked balance in LN..
*Facepalm*
That's like saying you are admitting Bitcoin's total supply can be modified because anyone can change the supply consensus rules in their client. But in doing so, you effectively create your own network with no one else on it.
Read more carefully and actually TRY to comprehend. Don't just deliberately take things out of context to support your pre-existing misconceptions.
we are talking about LN.. stop trying to compare LN to bitcoin by using bitcoin as an example..
LN is not bitcoin
LN is just that.. its own network (the secret is in the N (network))
the whole purpose of LN is to have its own set of rules that differ to bitcoins rules
its the whole point...
even thor turbo admits to this by saying their unbacked channels are customary and usually those accepting unbacked balance are using their software varient..
i still cant beleive you actually try to dismiss LN issues by bringing a bitcoin example into the scenario.
LN is not bitcoin. so what cant be done by bitcoin CAN be done by LN. so just stop trying to fool people thinking LN does the same as bitcoin
read their dang quote in that topic which you foolishly thought was in your favour.
its you that does not understand it..
you foolishly wrote it as if to say if people have custom rules they have to be in full knowledge and understanding of the terms and conditions of that custom ruleset... WHICH IS WRONG. most people dont know what thy are getting into and there is not big list of terms and conditions listing everything.
then you now go on some obsurb notion that if there were these custom rules that no one else would be on the network..
loads use it..
you are such a fool
you do realise that LN has no community wide transaction validity review system. no blockchain. reqiring full network coopertion
heck i could set up a route of
a<->b<->c<->d
and say if i was C.. i could be in a thor turbo channel with D and also another wallet ruleset with b
do you know why..
because the funds of B do not go to D
even if a or b wanted to pay D.. the funds do not exit their channels.
instead my node see's that i am 'presumed promised' funds in the b-c channel.. i then separately then 'presume promise' funds to d in the c-d channel.
again B does not need to communicate to D
B goes through C and C decides to use C-D funds or not
please just wake up and realise that people can tinker around and make custom rules and it does not need a full network effect. it just is channel partner related.
.. i hope you grasp the small scale co-partner side of it one day.. then maybe you can grasp the effect it can have on a wider scale.
especially hope you one day grasp that average joe doesnt actually go to coding school or legal school to learn all the terms and conditions and code rules .. they just simply open a wallet and think they are funded..
you know much like how millions of citizens thought for decades that bank notes were still backed by gold.
i truly doubt you ever use it by the lack of true understanding beyond promotional material spoon feeds.
i doubt you even know of all the risks of loses, scams and other threats possible in LN. because all you seem to know is the positive spin PR stuff
i used to think that your were not that technical and more of a marketing guy.. but now i think your even failing the basics of marketing.. you know the part about know your product.
do i really need to ask you to do your research.. or will you just for once try it without having to be told
heck the whole point of these litemobile wallets to make walking into retailers to make fast transactions is to not need to have a desktop handy to check/view/use the blockchain. so high percentage of people wont check even if they knew how to. they just blindly 'trust' ln because they been promised every channel is backed and everything is secure ..
atleast wise up that its not the case
you do realise that with most average joe that dont read raw transaction data. even things like schnorr can become an abusive tool for LN
just imagine it. someone makes a multisig of 2-3 but keeps 2 and the other person has the 1. the other person thinks its just a 2-2 because nothing in schnorr reveals who or how many parties are involved.
not the person with the 2 can singularly sign funds without the other party. and the other party cant do anything about it.