Cool 10 Statistics about Crypto Gambling: https://jackpotinsight.com/10-crypto-gambling-statistics-infographic/ . Enjoy!
Feel free to republish and distribute this infographic.
Topic: JackpotInsight.com - online review guide (Read 508 times)
It has no difference from the other online review guides that I've seen. I don't know but probably just keep it up or if you've got some other designs on your mind, can test those.
While the forum has a couple of known online casinos and reviews, maybe you can learn from them. The domain you've chosen looks good and gives the idea on what type of website and contents you're making.
While the forum has a couple of known online casinos and reviews, maybe you can learn from them. The domain you've chosen looks good and gives the idea on what type of website and contents you're making.
A new section into our portal: https://jackpotinsight.com/versus/ - a casino comparison section. Any feedback will be highly appreciated.
Welcome to our new partners, Winz.io: https://jackpotinsight.com/winz-io-casino-review-and-bonuses/ !
Also, I have in plan to develop a little Casino Academy, with valuable tips and tricks for players (beginners or not), something like this: https://jackpotinsight.com/navigating-the-online-casino-world-a-guide-to-avoiding-common-mistakes-as-a-new-player/
Also, I have in plan to develop a little Casino Academy, with valuable tips and tricks for players (beginners or not), something like this: https://jackpotinsight.com/navigating-the-online-casino-world-a-guide-to-avoiding-common-mistakes-as-a-new-player/
I completely agree that for the convenience of site users, it is worth making a standard block of information on frequently asked questions and answers to them in such cases. And of course, gradually build up and unify such information. But of course so that it doesn't get monstrously big and long and intricate. This work will further reduce the labor costs of employees for correspondence and the same type of user responses, which, by the way, most users hate and treat them as responses from bots.
This immediately completely spoils the image of a very good project.
Truly, if the frequently asked questions option is available, the stress on the customer care service for assistance and support would be reduced a bit because of the information contained in the FAQ option. Most visitors who are not patient enough to wait to get or hear from the customer service ends up bad mouthing them. As a result of this they would end up loosing more traffic so I'm sure OP is aware of this so OP would need much funds to sustain the project.This immediately completely spoils the image of a very good project.
In addition, the standard behavior of a player in the event of a specific question of interest to him will eventually lead to his contacting a real support employee. This happens to me in 80% of all support calls. So it is quite possible that we are considering a section that will only partially solve the problem of mass appeals, but it is important simply even for reasons of increasing the prestige and sophistication of the site itself. In general, a reasonable middle ground is needed here in terms of labor costs and the effectiveness of such a section of the site.
Most cases being reported to customer care service are sometimes very necessary but I believe with the FAQ, some cases have a minimal chances of being ignored as they are very much important to both parties as be there might be some discoveries within which will need urgent attention. Possibly might be a bug discovered buy a member or otherwise. So it is very much important customer care service is functional and running.
Most times a customer care discoveries are of good effects to the casino because what ever they report to the team would be investigated and results being presented. Thus this result helps the casino to put up with things on their own end to deliver maximum satisfaction to their clients who patronise them.
These are the reasons why a casino should not ignore or abuse the customer care service so as to be on track for good service delivery as it is the major force of the casino.
This will immediately change the image of the casino to a negative one in the eyes of such a client, who, understandably, does not just ask his question out of idleness, but wants to understand the current situation. I think that even a little training is needed for support staff in terms of a polite attitude towards any and even rather aggressive clients.
You are making a point here. Customer care staff can be very funny sometimes. Their approach sometimes matter as well because that is the selling point for every organisation. The way you treat your client as a customer care service attendant determines of that customer would return on a good note to deal with such organisation. Some customer care staff are just very rude and lack manners or should I say training. They know not the basic rules of engagement with clients rather they take things for granted.
Aside online, I have had the experience and complaints from clients on some customer care service to not being friendly which is a bid problem because they stand chances of losing such customer to others competitors.
The idea of sending them for training is a good one because there they would learn on how to handle clients irrespective of their mode when their services are needed. This will build them and they will get more orientation as customer care service attendant.
There are also intrusive clients, dialogues with which last for a long time and the problem is not solved. It's just that often there is nothing else to do and they just want to talk. Such clients also annoy the support staff.
Finally, there are clientrs who refer to laws, ToS and other documents and threaten to sue the casino. They are also difficult to communicate with. In general, the set of dialogue options with different people at the support service is quite large and with many options for solving problems.
And such a specialist in communication with different people, of course, is better to learn in advance.
I completely agree that for the convenience of site users, it is worth making a standard block of information on frequently asked questions and answers to them in such cases. And of course, gradually build up and unify such information. But of course so that it doesn't get monstrously big and long and intricate. This work will further reduce the labor costs of employees for correspondence and the same type of user responses, which, by the way, most users hate and treat them as responses from bots.
This immediately completely spoils the image of a very good project.
Truly, if the frequently asked questions option is available, the stress on the customer care service for assistance and support would be reduced a bit because of the information contained in the FAQ option. Most visitors who are not patient enough to wait to get or hear from the customer service ends up bad mouthing them. As a result of this they would end up loosing more traffic so I'm sure OP is aware of this so OP would need much funds to sustain the project.This immediately completely spoils the image of a very good project.
In addition, the standard behavior of a player in the event of a specific question of interest to him will eventually lead to his contacting a real support employee. This happens to me in 80% of all support calls. So it is quite possible that we are considering a section that will only partially solve the problem of mass appeals, but it is important simply even for reasons of increasing the prestige and sophistication of the site itself. In general, a reasonable middle ground is needed here in terms of labor costs and the effectiveness of such a section of the site.
Most cases being reported to customer care service are sometimes very necessary but I believe with the FAQ, some cases have a minimal chances of being ignored as they are very much important to both parties as be there might be some discoveries within which will need urgent attention. Possibly might be a bug discovered buy a member or otherwise. So it is very much important customer care service is functional and running.
Most times a customer care discoveries are of good effects to the casino because what ever they report to the team would be investigated and results being presented. Thus this result helps the casino to put up with things on their own end to deliver maximum satisfaction to their clients who patronise them.
These are the reasons why a casino should not ignore or abuse the customer care service so as to be on track for good service delivery as it is the major force of the casino.
This will immediately change the image of the casino to a negative one in the eyes of such a client, who, understandably, does not just ask his question out of idleness, but wants to understand the current situation. I think that even a little training is needed for support staff in terms of a polite attitude towards any and even rather aggressive clients.
You are making a point here. Customer care staff can be very funny sometimes. Their approach sometimes matter as well because that is the selling point for every organisation. The way you treat your client as a customer care service attendant determines of that customer would return on a good note to deal with such organisation. Some customer care staff are just very rude and lack manners or should I say training. They know not the basic rules of engagement with clients rather they take things for granted.
Aside online, I have had the experience and complaints from clients on some customer care service to not being friendly which is a bid problem because they stand chances of losing such customer to others competitors.
The idea of sending them for training is a good one because there they would learn on how to handle clients irrespective of their mode when their services are needed. This will build them and they will get more orientation as customer care service attendant.
Rating system is indeed confusing and you could really be able to see those stars but not really be able to see Zero reviews which you would really be making out those questions on your mind on how its possible?
Yeah, the review system is a little bit confusing. All published reviews have an initial score, based on editor experience. If there is no external user review, this rating will be shown.
he's still working on the reviews, which is understandable because he is a new player on this field. in time, you will gain patrons so long you are giving honest feedback. and you need to keep updated also with new features and perks offered by the site. there are so many gamblers outside this forum, so he can always attract a player, should always give a valuable insight so players will keep tab on your site.
Yes, this is true. it's work in progress. I cannot put more than one review on each week, because I need and I want to have only decent casinos listed.
I just found out there is an online casino named Casino-X. I don't want to create confusion, so, from today, I've moved all content to a new domain: https://JackpotInsight.com . Not sure if is ok to keep this thread, if not, maybe an admin can delete it and I will start a fresh one.
There is no need to create a new topic. All you have to do is to edit the content of OP. By the way, I see no need for the: "Formely CasinoX" since the link redirects to the new domain!
There are many review websites out here and the competition in this field is very tough. To stand out from your competitors, you need to add as many casinos as you can (you reviewed only five which is not enough). In your reviews, you need to talk about your personal experience and not just some info from casinos' ToS.
Good luck with your project.
he's still working on the reviews, which is understandable because he is a new player on this field. in time, you will gain patrons so long you are giving honest feedback. and you need to keep updated also with new features and perks offered by the site. there are so many gamblers outside this forum, so he can always attract a player, should always give a valuable insight so players will keep tab on your site.
I just found out there is an online casino named Casino-X. I don't want to create confusion, so, from today, I've moved all content to a new domain: https://JackpotInsight.com . Not sure if is ok to keep this thread, if not, maybe an admin can delete it and I will start a fresh one.
There is no need to create a new topic. All you have to do is to edit the content of OP. By the way, I see no need for the: "Formely CasinoX" since the link redirects to the new domain!
There are many review websites out here and the competition in this field is very tough. To stand out from your competitors, you need to add as many casinos as you can (you reviewed only five which is not enough). In your reviews, you need to talk about your personal experience and not just some info from casinos' ToS.
Good luck with your project.
I am confused about the rating system. Users can rate it but do those affect the rating in the site or what? BitStarz has 9.5 and zero user reviews.
And how new this site is? It looks good but as there are only 5 casinos and all of them have nearly five stars, it's pointless so far, as everyone needs to know about the bad sites, and maybe some transparency on who does the ranking. Do you take requests what sites should be added or are you already too overloaded with the amount of sites. Also do you want compensation from the casino before releasing the review?
That’s really confusing especially if the rating doesn’t show how many gamblers review that site.And how new this site is? It looks good but as there are only 5 casinos and all of them have nearly five stars, it's pointless so far, as everyone needs to know about the bad sites, and maybe some transparency on who does the ranking. Do you take requests what sites should be added or are you already too overloaded with the amount of sites. Also do you want compensation from the casino before releasing the review?
We actually need more a reputable review site that give fair rate about the casinos but having this issue, i think many will hesitant. Anyway, i hope this site will grow more and have some updates too, try to list more good site as much as possible and get the real reviews from the player itself.
Ex. BitStrarz Casino Highlights
https://jackpotinsight.com/bitstarz-casino-review/
Rating system is indeed confusing and you could really be able to see those stars but not really be able to see Zero reviews which you would really be making out those questions on your mind on how its possible?
In speaking about review sites then there's nothing could beat out;
BTCGOSU
Cryptogamblingbro
This is where should these new review sites should be looking on how a review site should really look like and give out some ideas on how
they would be able to build theirs or else they wont really be getting that much attention.
I am confused about the rating system. Users can rate it but do those affect the rating in the site or what? BitStarz has 9.5 and zero user reviews.
And how new this site is? It looks good but as there are only 5 casinos and all of them have nearly five stars, it's pointless so far, as everyone needs to know about the bad sites, and maybe some transparency on who does the ranking. Do you take requests what sites should be added or are you already too overloaded with the amount of sites. Also do you want compensation from the casino before releasing the review?
That’s really confusing especially if the rating doesn’t show how many gamblers review that site.And how new this site is? It looks good but as there are only 5 casinos and all of them have nearly five stars, it's pointless so far, as everyone needs to know about the bad sites, and maybe some transparency on who does the ranking. Do you take requests what sites should be added or are you already too overloaded with the amount of sites. Also do you want compensation from the casino before releasing the review?
We actually need more a reputable review site that give fair rate about the casinos but having this issue, i think many will hesitant. Anyway, i hope this site will grow more and have some updates too, try to list more good site as much as possible and get the real reviews from the player itself.
I am confused about the rating system. Users can rate it but do those affect the rating in the site or what? BitStarz has 9.5 and zero user reviews.
And how new this site is? It looks good but as there are only 5 casinos and all of them have nearly five stars, it's pointless so far, as everyone needs to know about the bad sites, and maybe some transparency on who does the ranking. Do you take requests what sites should be added or are you already too overloaded with the amount of sites. Also do you want compensation from the casino before releasing the review?
And how new this site is? It looks good but as there are only 5 casinos and all of them have nearly five stars, it's pointless so far, as everyone needs to know about the bad sites, and maybe some transparency on who does the ranking. Do you take requests what sites should be added or are you already too overloaded with the amount of sites. Also do you want compensation from the casino before releasing the review?
I just found out there is an online casino named Casino-X. I don't want to create confusion, so, from today, I've moved all content to a new domain: https://JackpotInsight.com . Not sure if is ok to keep this thread, if not, maybe an admin can delete it and I will start a fresh one.
If you don't intend to keep the thread any longer, you can as well lock the thread and thereafter report the thread to moderators for possible deletion but until then, locking the thread will be the best possible option open to you right now since you already stated that you already moved the site to another domain since there is name conflicting with another review platform. Expecting to see you lock the thread any moment if that is what you have concluded to do.
2. All listed casinos have reviews. Just click on the title, not on button
Okay, I found it and went through, felt you could have added some user experience on the review by actual users. I am not saying it is bad what I saying is that it is not convincing enough. I have another advise for you and that is why not start a small signature campaign here about your platform. In the past there we did saw such campaign by other review platforms. Think about a budget and hire a signature campaign manager. Well, not all are the same so some may still dislike it. So far I only saw a few gambling review site who avail a campaign in the forum but it was usually the casino is the one who does that. It was still up to them if they will follow your advice and the footsteps of other gambling review sites.
I completely agree that for the convenience of site users, it is worth making a standard block of information on frequently asked questions and answers to them in such cases. And of course, gradually build up and unify such information. But of course so that it doesn't get monstrously big and long and intricate. This work will further reduce the labor costs of employees for correspondence and the same type of user responses, which, by the way, most users hate and treat them as responses from bots.
This immediately completely spoils the image of a very good project.
Truly, if the frequently asked questions option is available, the stress on the customer care service for assistance and support would be reduced a bit because of the information contained in the FAQ option. Most visitors who are not patient enough to wait to get or hear from the customer service ends up bad mouthing them. As a result of this they would end up loosing more traffic so I'm sure OP is aware of this so OP would need much funds to sustain the project.This immediately completely spoils the image of a very good project.
In addition, the standard behavior of a player in the event of a specific question of interest to him will eventually lead to his contacting a real support employee. This happens to me in 80% of all support calls. So it is quite possible that we are considering a section that will only partially solve the problem of mass appeals, but it is important simply even for reasons of increasing the prestige and sophistication of the site itself. In general, a reasonable middle ground is needed here in terms of labor costs and the effectiveness of such a section of the site.
Most cases being reported to customer care service are sometimes very necessary but I believe with the FAQ, some cases have a minimal chances of being ignored as they are very much important to both parties as be there might be some discoveries within which will need urgent attention. Possibly might be a bug discovered buy a member or otherwise. So it is very much important customer care service is functional and running.
Most times a customer care discoveries are of good effects to the casino because what ever they report to the team would be investigated and results being presented. Thus this result helps the casino to put up with things on their own end to deliver maximum satisfaction to their clients who patronise them.
These are the reasons why a casino should not ignore or abuse the customer care service so as to be on track for good service delivery as it is the major force of the casino.
This will immediately change the image of the casino to a negative one in the eyes of such a client, who, understandably, does not just ask his question out of idleness, but wants to understand the current situation. I think that even a little training is needed for support staff in terms of a polite attitude towards any and even rather aggressive clients.
So the problem is solved, now something I don't understand is why you haven't added all the good casinos that are on this forum to your site? I believe that it would be more advantageous to have many good casinos that are in this forum listed on your website, and another point that I noticed on your website is that you did not put the minimum withdrawal amount of each casino that is listed on your website, I saw that you put the TOS link of each casino that is listed on your site.
In your opinion, what casinos are great to play on? I will like to know what casinos are great to play on, from your point of view.
in my point of view good casinos should be casinos that have types of accounts, for example VIP accounts and offer weekly and monthly bonuses based on the vip level, because this type of bonus does not need to have requirements for people to be able to withdraw, it is a bonus calculated based on what the person has been playing and also a good casino is one that has a very low withdrawal amount. for example if a person wants to play just for fun and of course if he wins it will be very good, that person puts 10$ in the casino and wins, with that that person has 15$ and wants to continue playing but also withdraw the principal which in this case would be 10$ and I would leave the 5$ to continue playing
this could only be done in casinos with a low withdrawal amount, now what I have seen is that in some casinos the minimum withdrawal amount is 50$ and there are other casinos that even have more than 100$ as a minimum withdrawal amount and this makes people deposit money, something like 10$, then they make an odd bet of @1.60 for example, they get it right and they get 16$ and when they try to withdraw they find out that the minimum withdrawal amount is 50$, once someone sees this, all they have to do is keep playing and they lose everything, so these high withdrawal amounts don't make sense, it looks like they are a way for people to only play with high amounts and many people don't read the TOS of the casinos before creating an account, that's why I was saying that in your reviews you mention the minimum withdrawal values
about the good casinos that I said that you could add, I confess that I have only used 4 casinos until today, which are:
sportsbet.io = it was the first bookmaker I used and I never had a problem with them, without a doubt they are one of the best sites in the gambling industry, you can see their ann thread here on the forum:
🚀-Sportsbet.io-🚀 - Main sponsor of ?? ?? ??
I don't know what is the minimum withdrawal amount they charge. but I think it would be nice if you added them to your site
Stake.com = it's already listed on your site, but it was my second casino that I used and I use it now, because it has good benefits and has the lowest withdrawals I've ever seen, so without a doubt they are the best casino
Duelbits.com = I also use Duelbits, but I use it sometimes because it has a very high minimum withdrawal amount in my opinion, but in terms of reliability I must say that they are also a good casino that is worth adding to your website
Duelbits.com | Casino & Sportsbook | VIP | Instant withdrawals!|ARGENTINA & AVFC
I have not used other casinos, but I see that they are good casinos because they have been working for a few years without many problems, I am talking about these casinos:
Rollbit.com | Crypto's Most Rewarding Casino 👑
Roobet.com | Crypto’s Fastest Growing Casino 🦘
I don't know what the minimum withdrawal amounts are for these two casinos. but you can add them on your website and other casinos that are here on the forum and are good casinos
I completely agree that for the convenience of site users, it is worth making a standard block of information on frequently asked questions and answers to them in such cases. And of course, gradually build up and unify such information. But of course so that it doesn't get monstrously big and long and intricate. This work will further reduce the labor costs of employees for correspondence and the same type of user responses, which, by the way, most users hate and treat them as responses from bots.
This immediately completely spoils the image of a very good project.
Truly, if the frequently asked questions option is available, the stress on the customer care service for assistance and support would be reduced a bit because of the information contained in the FAQ option. Most visitors who are not patient enough to wait to get or hear from the customer service ends up bad mouthing them. As a result of this they would end up loosing more traffic so I'm sure OP is aware of this so OP would need much funds to sustain the project.This immediately completely spoils the image of a very good project.
In addition, the standard behavior of a player in the event of a specific question of interest to him will eventually lead to his contacting a real support employee. This happens to me in 80% of all support calls. So it is quite possible that we are considering a section that will only partially solve the problem of mass appeals, but it is important simply even for reasons of increasing the prestige and sophistication of the site itself. In general, a reasonable middle ground is needed here in terms of labor costs and the effectiveness of such a section of the site.
Most cases being reported to customer care service are sometimes very necessary but I believe with the FAQ, some cases have a minimal chances of being ignored as they are very much important to both parties as be there might be some discoveries within which will need urgent attention. Possibly might be a bug discovered buy a member or otherwise. So it is very much important customer care service is functional and running.
Most times a customer care discoveries are of good effects to the casino because what ever they report to the team would be investigated and results being presented. Thus this result helps the casino to put up with things on their own end to deliver maximum satisfaction to their clients who patronise them.
These are the reasons why a casino should not ignore or abuse the customer care service so as to be on track for good service delivery as it is the major force of the casino.
I completely agree that for the convenience of site users, it is worth making a standard block of information on frequently asked questions and answers to them in such cases. And of course, gradually build up and unify such information. But of course so that it doesn't get monstrously big and long and intricate. This work will further reduce the labor costs of employees for correspondence and the same type of user responses, which, by the way, most users hate and treat them as responses from bots.
This immediately completely spoils the image of a very good project.
Truly, if the frequently asked questions option is available, the stress on the customer care service for assistance and support would be reduced a bit because of the information contained in the FAQ option. Most visitors who are not patient enough to wait to get or hear from the customer service ends up bad mouthing them. As a result of this they would end up loosing more traffic so I'm sure OP is aware of this so OP would need much funds to sustain the project.This immediately completely spoils the image of a very good project.
In addition, the standard behavior of a player in the event of a specific question of interest to him will eventually lead to his contacting a real support employee. This happens to me in 80% of all support calls. So it is quite possible that we are considering a section that will only partially solve the problem of mass appeals, but it is important simply even for reasons of increasing the prestige and sophistication of the site itself. In general, a reasonable middle ground is needed here in terms of labor costs and the effectiveness of such a section of the site.
So the problem is solved, now something I don't understand is why you haven't added all the good casinos that are on this forum to your site? I believe that it would be more advantageous to have many good casinos that are in this forum listed on your website, and another point that I noticed on your website is that you did not put the minimum withdrawal amount of each casino that is listed on your website, I saw that you put the TOS link of each casino that is listed on your site.
In your opinion, what casinos are great to play on? I will like to know what casinos are great to play on, from your point of view.
I just found out there is an online casino named Casino-X. I don't want to create confusion, so, from today, I've moved all content to a new domain: https://JackpotInsight.com . Not sure if is ok to keep this thread, if not, maybe an admin can delete it and I will start a fresh one.
I assume you are talking about this casino: https://casino-x.com and there is more than one casino with the name of CasinoX, from what I could see there are these two: https://casinox.com and https://casinox-com.com I don't know if they are registered trademarks, but it seems to me that they are not, you also didn't need to change the entire name of the casino, you could choose to use casinoXI because as you have already created an account on this forum with your username casinoX so it was adding something after the X there in the name of your casino that would already be solved, with that you would also take advantage of using that word casino because it is a word that many people search on the internet
anyway that new name you gave your site is also very good and from what I could research there is no casino with that name. So the problem is solved, now something I don't understand is why you haven't added all the good casinos that are on this forum to your site? I believe that it would be more advantageous to have many good casinos that are in this forum listed on your website, and another point that I noticed on your website is that you did not put the minimum withdrawal amount of each casino that is listed on your website, I saw that you put the TOS link of each casino that is listed on your site
but speaking from experience, people hardly spend time reading the casino's TOS before creating an account and only after creating an account and want to withdraw and find out that the minimum withdrawal amount is very high, I don't want to mention the name of the casino , but I must say that despite being a very good casino it has a very high withdrawal amount and so I hope you put the withdrawal amounts of each casino so that people know in advance, the stake and the casino with the amount lowest withdrawal from these casinos that are on your website, I will not speak of the name of the casino with extremely high value
Jump to: