Topic: Jamalaezaz, worst campaign manager ever (Read 2151 times)
he i not the only camp manager , you can definitely choose to work for other camp manager.
I'm just going to give my 2cents, take it or leave it.
As a newbie, Jamal was the only one to even talk to me. I was allowed to do a translation.
Later, Jamal received a complaint that translation was not good. I got disqualified.
I messaged Jamal and explained that I am a native and that complaint was false.
He listened to my arguments and then he changed my status again to accepted.
Although Bounties for the campaign have not yet been distributed, I believe that if
someone he disqualifies talks to him about it and explains his argument, he will find that
Jamal is a reasonable man.
So I don't know... to me atleast, he doesn't seem like a bad campaign manager at all...
As a newbie, Jamal was the only one to even talk to me. I was allowed to do a translation.
Later, Jamal received a complaint that translation was not good. I got disqualified.
I messaged Jamal and explained that I am a native and that complaint was false.
He listened to my arguments and then he changed my status again to accepted.
Although Bounties for the campaign have not yet been distributed, I believe that if
someone he disqualifies talks to him about it and explains his argument, he will find that
Jamal is a reasonable man.
So I don't know... to me atleast, he doesn't seem like a bad campaign manager at all...
Im going to watch on how much the community will suffer cos this dude is already running multiple signature while his previous campaign are still having problems. I guess he likes to create confusion to steal and people can only say that they are missing pay-outs hehe
That's the way they answer. I am on DT 2.
You are DT nothing, idiot. 
I have heard a lot of complains about Jamal I know he is sincere but he gets fucked when he don't use escrow..He should use one.
Cheap people try to cut any costs, thus avoid using escrow.Simple way to keep annoyed from this. Don't participate any campign he managed. Or rather contact the project Dev to don't hire this person. That would be the thing to do.
That is no solution of any kind. Jamal should either learn how to properly manage campaigns or stop managing them completely. 
Simple way to keep annoyed from this. Don't participate any campign he managed. Or rather contact the project Dev to don't hire this person. That would be the thing to do.
Jamal and suporters always accused participanst using multiple accounts. That's the way they answer. I am on DT 2. I delete my red trust to jamal because he in the end paid the bounty reward. But the fact the payment is lower than the stated in the ann. It's OK It is just lesson to bounty participants. You see that monaco and onegram show the end of crowd bounty WHy? Why? That's the same manager, the same case. He is not scammer but he is unfair. If he sees that some participants using multiple account just easy to mark red at the first week. No problem after that. isn't it.
Ahh...Sorry mate you are not in DT2.
I have heard a lot of complains about Jamal I know he is sincere but he gets fucked when he don't use escrow..He should use one.
Jamal and suporters always accused participanst using multiple accounts. That's the way they answer. I am on DT 2. I delete my red trust to jamal because he in the end paid the bounty reward. But the fact the payment is lower than the stated in the ann. It's OK It is just lesson to bounty participants. You see that monaco and onegram show the end of crowd bounty WHy? Why? That's the same manager, the same case. He is not scammer but he is unfair. If he sees that some participants using multiple account just easy to mark red at the first week. No problem after that. isn't it.
Red mark isn't a sanction for a user with multiple accounts because those account with red trust are just going to be thrown away and they could again create another account. A better sanction is to disqualify the account for it not to be in a campaign again, those accounts are luckier that Jamal didnt add a red mark along with disqualification else they can't join to campaigns not managed by jamal.
Jamal and suporters always accused participanst using multiple accounts. That's the way they answer. I delete my red trust to jamal because he in the end paid the bounty reward. But the fact the payment is lower than the stated in the ann. It's OK It is just lesson to bounty participants. You see that monaco and onegram show the end of crowd bounty WHy? Why? That's the same manager, the same case. He is not scammer but he is unfair. If he sees that some participants using multiple account just easy to mark red at the first week. No problem after that. isn't it.
Does it mean onegram team don't pay or jama not pay.If onegram not pay , onegram will make the name of islam bad but if jamal not pay I will never join the campaign managed by him.
I already decide this I will never join any campaign which is managed by Jamal because he is really one of worst person here managing campaigns and rejecting members at the end of campaign its never been fair i was rejected at the end of the campaign by accusing me of multiple accounts without any evidence and clarity,really disappointing
if you Mr. Jamalz accused me for that reason .i want to ask for proof that I am a multi account with his allegations
Why don't you ask Jamal for proof of having a multiple accounts, if he has proven you have multiple account would you take back the responses you made here? The guys is just working for the team, if the team hasn't given you the bounties you can always ask the dev if they have already paid jamal. The way I see it is that Jamal can't give you the bounties unless the dev team already sent the payment to him.
He has given me an explanation of this misunderstanding,so i am quite satisfied with the answer. Jamalz
Does it mean onegram team don't pay or jama not pay.If onegram not pay , onegram will make the name of islam bad but if jamal not pay I will never join the campaign managed by him.
I already decide this I will never join any campaign which is managed by Jamal because he is really one of worst person here managing campaigns and rejecting members at the end of campaign its never been fair i was rejected at the end of the campaign by accusing me of multiple accounts without any evidence and clarity,really disappointing
if you Mr. Jamalz accused me for that reason .i want to ask for proof that I am a multi account with his allegations
Why don't you ask Jamal for proof of having a multiple accounts, if he has proven you have multiple account would you take back the responses you made here? The guys is just working for the team, if the team hasn't given you the bounties you can always ask the dev if they have already paid jamal. The way I see it is that Jamal can't give you the bounties unless the dev team already sent the payment to him.
Does it mean onegram team don't pay or jama not pay.If onegram not pay , onegram will make the name of islam bad but if jamal not pay I will never join the campaign managed by him.
I already decide this I will never join any campaign which is managed by Jamal because he is really one of worst person here managing campaigns and rejecting members at the end of campaign its never been fair i was rejected at the end of the campaign by accusing me of multiple accounts without any evidence and clarity,really disappointing
if you Mr. Jamalz accused me for that reason .i want to ask for proof that I am a multi account with his allegations
Sigh..
A lot of problem happened,and he's really a trouble maker.
His campaign always ended with questionable ending,
And the participants always rejected for unknown reason,even thought they accepted them in the first and second week.
After that he'll reject them.
And lack of comunication with other team member,make it even worst.
Corruption? It might be
Old strategy of him " Reject participants at the end of campaign. " A lot of problem happened,and he's really a trouble maker.
His campaign always ended with questionable ending,
And the participants always rejected for unknown reason,even thought they accepted them in the first and second week.
After that he'll reject them.
And lack of comunication with other team member,make it even worst.
Corruption? It might be
Thatis is his best strategy with delay payment.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1924985.1540 this is monaco card problem
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1905333.580 onegram case the same
Already answered this in Monaco thread:
there is no reason to reject someone from start.
I accept users from beginning because I think they may follow the rules.. if someone follow the rules there is no chance for him to get rejected. for other who don't care about rules they deserve to get disqualified.
only 43 users out of 250+ disqualified. and anyone can see why I've rejected them and BTW I am still open to listen those who think they disqualified by mistake or with wrong reason (already changed 3 user's status from rejected to accepted)
Probably he gets your bounty. Its likely that is his strategy to confuse people and gets to ran-off with your tokens.
Sigh..
A lot of problem happened,and he's really a trouble maker.
His campaign always ended with questionable ending,
And the participants always rejected for unknown reason,even thought they accepted them in the first and second week.
After that he'll reject them.
And lack of comunication with other team member,make it even worst.
Corruption? It might be
Old strategy of him " Reject participants at the end of campaign. " A lot of problem happened,and he's really a trouble maker.
His campaign always ended with questionable ending,
And the participants always rejected for unknown reason,even thought they accepted them in the first and second week.
After that he'll reject them.
And lack of comunication with other team member,make it even worst.
Corruption? It might be
Thatis is his best strategy with delay payment.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1924985.1540 this is monaco card problem
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1905333.580 onegram case the same
Already answered this in Monaco thread:
there is no reason to reject someone from start.
I accept users from beginning because I think they may follow the rules.. if someone follow the rules there is no chance for him to get rejected. for other who don't care about rules they deserve to get disqualified.
only 43 users out of 250+ disqualified. and anyone can see why I've rejected them and BTW I am still open to listen those who think they disqualified by mistake or with wrong reason (already changed 3 user's status from rejected to accepted)
Sigh..
A lot of problem happened,and he's really a trouble maker.
His campaign always ended with questionable ending,
And the participants always rejected for unknown reason,even thought they accepted them in the first and second week.
After that he'll reject them.
And lack of comunication with other team member,make it even worst.
Corruption? It might be
Old strategy of him " Reject participants at the end of campaign. " A lot of problem happened,and he's really a trouble maker.
His campaign always ended with questionable ending,
And the participants always rejected for unknown reason,even thought they accepted them in the first and second week.
After that he'll reject them.
And lack of comunication with other team member,make it even worst.
Corruption? It might be
Thatis is his best strategy with delay payment.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1924985.1540 this is monaco card problem
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1905333.580 onegram case the same
Already answered this in Monaco thread:
there is no reason to reject someone from start.
I accept users from beginning because I think they may follow the rules.. if someone follow the rules there is no chance for him to get rejected. for other who don't care about rules they deserve to get disqualified.
only 43 users out of 250+ disqualified. and anyone can see why I've rejected them and BTW I am still open to listen those who think they disqualified by mistake or with wrong reason (already changed 3 user's status from rejected to accepted)
Sigh..
A lot of problem happened,and he's really a trouble maker.
His campaign always ended with questionable ending,
And the participants always rejected for unknown reason,even thought they accepted them in the first and second week.
After that he'll reject them.
And lack of comunication with other team member,make it even worst.
Corruption? It might be
Old strategy of him " Reject participants at the end of campaign. " A lot of problem happened,and he's really a trouble maker.
His campaign always ended with questionable ending,
And the participants always rejected for unknown reason,even thought they accepted them in the first and second week.
After that he'll reject them.
And lack of comunication with other team member,make it even worst.
Corruption? It might be
Thatis is his best strategy with delay payment.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1924985.1540 this is monaco card problem
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1905333.580 onegram case the same
Jamal run with 25k of monaco bounty.
25% will be used for other bounties & contests.
Sigh..
A lot of problem happened,and he's really a trouble maker.
His campaign always ended with questionable ending,
And the participants always rejected for unknown reason,even thought they accepted them in the first and second week.
After that he'll reject them.
And lack of comunication with other team member,make it even worst.
Corruption? It might be
A lot of problem happened,and he's really a trouble maker.
His campaign always ended with questionable ending,
And the participants always rejected for unknown reason,even thought they accepted them in the first and second week.
After that he'll reject them.
And lack of comunication with other team member,make it even worst.
Corruption? It might be
Guys do you know jamal ?
NO? neither i, im SURE i don't! i never worked with him i none one of my Bitcointalk project !!!
but he claims the contrary
but the layer, cheater and robbery says something that he can't prove
MY BEST FRIEND?
Do you know TAAS TEAM who is your "trusted" campaign manager?
This is only the beginning of the trap, stay tuned other coming
NO? neither i, im SURE i don't! i never worked with him i none one of my Bitcointalk project !!!
but he claims the contrary
but the layer, cheater and robbery says something that he can't prove
MY BEST FRIEND?
Do you know TAAS TEAM who is your "trusted" campaign manager?
This is only the beginning of the trap, stay tuned other coming
I guess you (OP) is one of OneGram's participants? You didn't get any payment until now and you using new account to criticize him?
Oh well, you joined in a risky campaign without any escrow
There are 2 other managers besides jamal, what happened with them?
Oh well, you joined in a risky campaign without any escrow
Declaimer:, There is no Escrow in this Program.
Bounty managers have no control of any kind of funds and payments. all bounties will be paid directly From Project leads/core team. so bounty manager's should not be called responsible for any payment and funds.
Bounty managers have no control of any kind of funds and payments. all bounties will be paid directly From Project leads/core team. so bounty manager's should not be called responsible for any payment and funds.
There are 2 other managers besides jamal, what happened with them?
They turned off. Only I am here trying to fix things and listening users blaming me ...
So, what actually are you trying to clarify? Has onegram refused to pay you for your campaign observation?
These recurr verbalizing questions should be plainly answered so that campaign participants would omit blaming you.
Does it mean onegram team don't pay or jama not pay.If onegram not pay , onegram will make the name of islam bad but if jamal not pay I will never join the campaign managed by him.
The way this is going, it's already putting a stain on the image of Onegram as an Islamic coin whether the fault is from Jamal or from the company. Whichever way, I guess that caveat on the first page of the Onegram campaign of not using an escrow is a pointer to what is happening now. None of them from that company wanted to take responsibility from the beginning if things went wrong as it is now. Jamal should have had the funds escrowed or held them himself just the way Yahoo does. So, Jamal should share in the blame. It's partly his fault.
I can't understand what Islam has to do with this onegram coin. The coin has nothing to do with Islam or nor is it Islamic in any way, they claimed the coin is Sharia compliant, which many muslims will differ too. Just by someone claiming something to be sharia compliant does not make it Islamic in any way
Tomorrow if I slap someone in the name of the president of America, will the president be blamed for it or I am the cunt
to be held responsible? Jump to: