Stop being a dick dude. You're like this guy who requested Incent to change its name because he always sees it as incest.
No man. You are thinking about someone else. But im serious. That name is to close to anus. Dont you agree or do I stand alone.
Why don't you go ask the astronomy community to rename Uranus while you're at it ...
Uranus was named in a time before the word anus was funny. It's not the same thing. I still think it should be changed.
It's just the token name, our holding company will not be named Janus. For now let's bury the subject, it won't matter what it's called when business revenue kickstarts the buyback on tokens.
It's a good idea to join slack and read up on the past week of development. This forum is ok for announcements, but if anyone is at all interested in following our team into mainstream business then I'd suggest catching up there.
I totally agree, this forum is just for main pointers but the real action is taking place in slack. I got a busy weekend but am usually visiting the slack rooms daily so will try get in there tonight once I finish all my house chores and errands.Janus is going to take us places we never dreamed possible.
The concern with the name is valid, u should think of rebranding. If its not in ur priorities, stop being defensive about suggested comparison with human's butt. Its not janus, but is indeed an anus. Changing things is not in ur authority cause u cant take it as given that being drunk while giving coin a name is not an excuse for profanity.
Im finding it incredibly hard to be nice about a topic this petty. Janus was/is a Roman god. If the name really is the reason you guys are investing in projects then it may be time for some soul searching.
Janus is also a popular Australian first name, in fact a few are in crypto so it be in everyone's best and mature interest to let the subject of names die.
The only anus that will be discussed 6 months from now are those launching theirs off at the people who didn't look into our project sooner. Have a great weekend everyone.
Give me 3 reasons why you think that's true.
1. Our strategy has multiple failsafes by design.
2. Although we are transparent publicly, there are things in development that are going to boost token value vicariously, and have not been made public.
3. I have had enough failures and successes to know the difference between a good and bad investment in business. I have 100% faith in my team and our work.
At this point if you haven't looked into Janus other than voicing your dislike of the name, there is plenty of info avail to make an investment decision or not. The fact that our team decided to start working on the project without the 5 million in funding we were needing alone should show we are dedicated.
If you still don't understand after reading everything in slack/social media/blogs/interviews and white paper what we are doing with this project then it's probably not for you.
Not one reason contained any facts or proof, jst words for all we know can be lies. How do we know your going to stick it out to the end? What proof can you provide us.
Let's use a recent "success" like the golem project, it's just words and no proof it will work in 2+ years from now when it will supposedly be finished. Yet 20 mins and 8 mil later everyone's doing back flips over words.
No one after we closed the original token sale is asking anyone to invest, in fact, the way this model is now being done allows for people to watch how our work progresses then make a more educated choice. If you have researched everything about our team and followed the past 6 weeks in slack and still don't want to partake then don't.
I simply cannot waste time trying to convince people when I can just be working on the goals we outlined. The money raised from the Nxt AE distribution is roughly 2-3 months worth of income we make from betterbets.io if you think that it's making us rich or over funded then you should now know it's not. Best to pass or continue watching for signs of following through with what we say.