Topic: JKC, the newest Litecoin-based alt coin has arrived! - page 3. (Read 54047 times)
Plan on the Exchange？
Quote
Fixed the Mh to Kh header. Also, do the shares match up?
It appears so, I did restart the miners a couple of times, it appears since the last restart about 905 accepted shares and the pool shows 1031 total accepted.
I can restart the miners, and do a recount. I will report back in about an hour or so.
From 9:00 to 9:46 the pool reports 355 shares (1423 @ 9:46) - (1068 @ 9:00) = 355
CGminer reports 173+129+50 = 352 shares
So the share counting is fine, and that is what is important.
I will check on my end, as I now believe I may be overwriting shares (aggressive Intensity..though I only run at 13 ( that is the threshold for memory overwrite according to CGminers developer).
Pools can be great diagnostic tools also.
TO the JKC community, niteryder's pool is perfectly fine, go ahead and join his pool with confidence.
Thanks! I do see a small bug. If you set the payout threshold to over 100, it defaults back to 99.99 when you refresh the page. I'll work on it.
Quote
Fixed the Mh to Kh header. Also, do the shares match up?
It appears so, I did restart the miners a couple of times, it appears since the last restart about 905 accepted shares and the pool shows 1031 total accepted.
I can restart the miners, and do a recount. I will report back in about an hour or so.
From 9:00 to 9:46 the pool reports 355 shares (1423 @ 9:46) - (1068 @ 9:00) = 355
CGminer reports 173+129+50 = 352 shares
So the share counting is fine, and that is what is important.
I will check on my end, as I now believe I may be overwriting shares (aggressive Intensity..though I only run at 13 ( that is the threshold for memory overwrite according to CGminers developer).
Pools can be great diagnostic tools also.
TO the JKC community, niteryder's pool is perfectly fine, go ahead and join his pool with confidence.
Does a high-rez pic with a transparent background exist of this coin?
Quote
Fixed the Mh to Kh header. Also, do the shares match up?
It appears so, I did restart the miners a couple of times, it appears since the last restart about 905 accepted shares and the pool shows 1031 total accepted.
I can restart the miners, and do a recount. I will report back in about an hour or so.
The label is here, on the accountworkers screen.
Grep finds the Mhash in two places:
I noticed the top hashers in the pool list seemed right, however my stats are way low.
For example cgminer reports on my 1st two rigs:
Miner 1
Miner 2
If anybody else hashrate seemes to be under reported, post a response. It may be a combination of miner software/pool software/mmcFE.
Although this is not a crtical issue, it may be that mmcFE is also under reporting total pool stats as well
Code:
Worker Accounts
CAUTION! Deletion of a worker could cause all associated shares for that worker to be lost. Do not delete Workers unless you are certain all of their shares have been counted or that you have never used that worker account.
Worker Name Password Active Mhash/s
CAUTION! Deletion of a worker could cause all associated shares for that worker to be lost. Do not delete Workers unless you are certain all of their shares have been counted or that you have never used that worker account.
Worker Name Password Active Mhash/s
Grep finds the Mhash in two places:
Code:
accountworkers.php:Worker Name Password Active Mhash/s
statsAuth.php:echo "Pool Hash Rate ". number_format($show_hashrate, 3) . " Mhash/s
statsAuth.php:echo "
I noticed the top hashers in the pool list seemed right, however my stats are way low.
For example cgminer reports on my 1st two rigs:
Miner 1
Code:
(5s):863.1K (avg):854.4Kh/s | Q:102 A:272 R:2 HW:0 E:267% U:3.2/m
ST: 2 SS: 0 DW: 202 NB: 35 LW: 548 GF: 0 RF: 0
Connected to jkc.allpoolz.com diff 64 with stratum as user
Block: 97ccb1234f51543d... Diff:128K Started: [20:18:27] Best share: 71.4K
ST: 2 SS: 0 DW: 202 NB: 35 LW: 548 GF: 0 RF: 0
Connected to jkc.allpoolz.com diff 64 with stratum as user
Block: 97ccb1234f51543d... Diff:128K Started: [20:18:27] Best share: 71.4K
Miner 2
Code:
(5s):897.0K (avg):895.2Kh/s | Q:106 A:244 R:0 HW:0 E:230% U:2.7/m
ST: 2 SS: 0 DW: 210 NB: 35 LW: 568 GF: 0 RF: 0
Connected to jkc.allpoolz.com diff 64 with stratum as user
Block: 97ccb1234f51543d... Diff:128K Started: [20:18:33] Best share: 47.7K
ST: 2 SS: 0 DW: 210 NB: 35 LW: 568 GF: 0 RF: 0
Connected to jkc.allpoolz.com diff 64 with stratum as user
Block: 97ccb1234f51543d... Diff:128K Started: [20:18:33] Best share: 47.7K
If anybody else hashrate seemes to be under reported, post a response. It may be a combination of miner software/pool software/mmcFE.
Although this is not a crtical issue, it may be that mmcFE is also under reporting total pool stats as well
Fixed the Mh to Kh header. Also, do the shares match up?
The label is here, on the accountworkers screen.
Grep finds the Mhash in two places:
I noticed the top hashers in the pool list seemed right, however my stats are way low.
For example cgminer reports on my 1st two rigs:
Miner 1
Miner 2
If anybody else hashrate seemes to be under reported, post a response. It may be a combination of miner software/pool software/mmcFE.
Although this is not a crtical issue, it may be that mmcFE is also under reporting total pool stats as well
Code:
Worker Accounts
CAUTION! Deletion of a worker could cause all associated shares for that worker to be lost. Do not delete Workers unless you are certain all of their shares have been counted or that you have never used that worker account.
Worker Name Password Active Mhash/s
CAUTION! Deletion of a worker could cause all associated shares for that worker to be lost. Do not delete Workers unless you are certain all of their shares have been counted or that you have never used that worker account.
Worker Name Password Active Mhash/s
Grep finds the Mhash in two places:
Code:
accountworkers.php:Worker Name Password Active Mhash/s
statsAuth.php:echo "Pool Hash Rate ". number_format($show_hashrate, 3) . " Mhash/s
statsAuth.php:echo "
I noticed the top hashers in the pool list seemed right, however my stats are way low.
For example cgminer reports on my 1st two rigs:
Miner 1
Code:
(5s):863.1K (avg):854.4Kh/s | Q:102 A:272 R:2 HW:0 E:267% U:3.2/m
ST: 2 SS: 0 DW: 202 NB: 35 LW: 548 GF: 0 RF: 0
Connected to jkc.allpoolz.com diff 64 with stratum as user
Block: 97ccb1234f51543d... Diff:128K Started: [20:18:27] Best share: 71.4K
ST: 2 SS: 0 DW: 202 NB: 35 LW: 548 GF: 0 RF: 0
Connected to jkc.allpoolz.com diff 64 with stratum as user
Block: 97ccb1234f51543d... Diff:128K Started: [20:18:27] Best share: 71.4K
Miner 2
Code:
(5s):897.0K (avg):895.2Kh/s | Q:106 A:244 R:0 HW:0 E:230% U:2.7/m
ST: 2 SS: 0 DW: 210 NB: 35 LW: 568 GF: 0 RF: 0
Connected to jkc.allpoolz.com diff 64 with stratum as user
Block: 97ccb1234f51543d... Diff:128K Started: [20:18:33] Best share: 47.7K
ST: 2 SS: 0 DW: 210 NB: 35 LW: 568 GF: 0 RF: 0
Connected to jkc.allpoolz.com diff 64 with stratum as user
Block: 97ccb1234f51543d... Diff:128K Started: [20:18:33] Best share: 47.7K
If anybody else hashrate seemes to be under reported, post a response. It may be a combination of miner software/pool software/mmcFE.
Although this is not a crtical issue, it may be that mmcFE is also under reporting total pool stats as well
Network hashrate 71 MH/s
"blocks" : 18537,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 1.96001316,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 72753553,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
"blocks" : 18537,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 1.96001316,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 72753553,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
LOl, all 5 of us mining are 10% of that.
Just a couple of suggestions to help your pool be the best it can.
First one is easy: In the account workers subscreen the rate column is still marked with the default mmcFE M/H label, when I believe you are showing K/H.
Second one is related to the first: The mmcFE accounting of the workers hash rate seems too low by about 450% (4.5x). For example: my worker number 2 is in reality working at about ~ 900 K/H but mmcFE is reporting around ~200 K/H. I understand that any pool software cannot be completely accurate with hash estimates, but 450% could be improved.
If you need any help, I have worked quite a bit with pool software (though the back-end is my forte , I have experimented with mmcFE). I assume you are using a stratum bridge to a pushpool, perhaps the issue lies there. Then again,I believe mmcFE estimates its hash rates strictly from the database.
I am always open to help. For the label, it looks all correct. What am I missing? Also, what should your total has rate be? I see 258, 264 and 64 K/h. I have 3 miners attached and it seems spot on.
Network hashrate 71 MH/s
"blocks" : 18537,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 1.96001316,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 72753553,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
"blocks" : 18537,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 1.96001316,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 72753553,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
LOl, all 5 of us mining are 10% of that.
Just a couple of suggestions to help your pool be the best it can.
First one is easy: In the account workers subscreen the rate column is still marked with the default mmcFE M/H label, when I believe you are showing K/H.
Second one is related to the first: The mmcFE accounting of the workers hash rate seems too low by about 450% (4.5x). For example: my worker number 2 is in reality working at about ~ 900 K/H but mmcFE is reporting around ~200 K/H. I understand that any pool software cannot be completely accurate with hash estimates, but 450% could be improved.
If you need any help, I have worked quite a bit with pool software (though the back-end is my forte , I have experimented with mmcFE). I assume you are using a stratum bridge to a pushpool, perhaps the issue lies there. Then again,I believe mmcFE estimates its hash rates strictly from the database.
P2Pool IP has changed to 37.11.63.133 (for people who can't connect directly to http://jkc.sytes.net:19327).
Network hashrate 71 MH/s
"blocks" : 18537,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 1.96001316,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 72753553,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
"blocks" : 18537,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 1.96001316,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 72753553,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
LOl, all 5 of us mining are 10% of that.
Network hashrate 71 MH/s
"blocks" : 18537,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 1.96001316,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 72753553,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
"blocks" : 18537,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 1.96001316,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 72753553,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
LOl, all 5 of us mining are 10% of that.
Thanks guys. Blocks are coming in. Please keep any eye on if the payouts are matching estimates.
I sending my hash power your way.
3 rigs (though rig 1 is down at the moment, it should be up to nite)
When everything is up and running, it should be a little over 3 M/H.
Network hashrate 71 MH/s
"blocks" : 18537,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 1.96001316,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 72753553,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
"blocks" : 18537,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 1.96001316,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 72753553,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
Thanks guys. Blocks are coming in. Please keep any eye on if the payouts are matching estimates.
I am in 
I'll toss a little bit your way niteryder
niteryder, thanks for the new pool. Can you also provide a status page.
Stats are on the main page. First block in the pool was solved and paid out. Looks to be working.
If this pools is verified to be working properly (need a few more users), I will use the awarded bounty to pre-fund the pool so we can have payouts after 10 confirms instead of 120.
niteryder, thanks for the new pool. Can you also provide a status page.
if i try to compile, i get the following error
main.cpp:17:53: fatal error: boost/random/uniform_int_distribution.hpp: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
make: *** [obj/main.o] Error 1
I realy don't know what i have todo....
main.cpp:17:53: fatal error: boost/random/uniform_int_distribution.hpp: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
make: *** [obj/main.o] Error 1
I realy don't know what i have todo....
Have you done a FULL install of the boost libraries?
for 12.4
libboost1.48-all-dev
thanks for that.. but now next error
net.cpp:21:32: fatal error: miniupnpc/miniwget.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
but I have done apt-get install miniupnpc
libminiupnpc-dev
Or follow the instructions to skip compiling the upnp code.
make -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=-
ok thanks again
last noop questions... how i can check my wallet.. or send/get coins to the wallet ?
This tells all: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Original_Bitcoin_client/API_calls_list
That works, Thank you niteryder
You can also do a :
./junkcoind help
To get a list of all the commands (even special or commands not listed in the wikki yet)
Code:
addmultisigaddress <'["key","key"]'> [account]
backupwallet
createrawtransaction [{"txid":txid,"vout":n},...] {address:amount,...}
decoderawtransaction
dumpprivkey
encryptwallet
getaccount
getaccountaddress
getaddressesbyaccount
getbalance [account] [minconf=1]
getblock
getblockcount
getblockhash
getblocktemplate [params]
getconnectioncount
getdifficulty
getgenerate
gethashespersec
getinfo
getmininginfo
getnetworkhashps [blocks]
getnewaddress [account]
getpeerinfo
getrawmempool
getrawtransaction [verbose=0]
getreceivedbyaccount [minconf=1]
getreceivedbyaddress [minconf=1]
gettransaction
getwork [data]
getworkex [data, coinbase]
help [command]
importprivkey [label]
keypoolrefill
listaccounts [minconf=1]
listreceivedbyaccount [minconf=1] [includeempty=false]
listreceivedbyaddress [minconf=1] [includeempty=false]
listsinceblock [blockhash] [target-confirmations]
listtransactions [account] [count=10] [from=0]
listunspent [minconf=1] [maxconf=999999]
move [minconf=1] [comment]
sendfrom [minconf=1] [comment] [comment-to]
sendmany {address:amount,...} [minconf=1] [comment]
sendrawtransaction
sendtoaddress [comment] [comment-to]
setaccount
setgenerate [genproclimit]
setmininput
settxfee
signmessage
signrawtransaction [{"txid":txid,"vout":n,"scriptPubKey":hex},...] [,...] [sighashtype="ALL"]
stop
validateaddress
verifymessage
backupwallet
createrawtransaction [{"txid":txid,"vout":n},...] {address:amount,...}
decoderawtransaction
dumpprivkey
encryptwallet
getaccount
getaccountaddress
getaddressesbyaccount
getbalance [account] [minconf=1]
getblock
getblockcount
getblockhash
getblocktemplate [params]
getconnectioncount
getdifficulty
getgenerate
gethashespersec
getinfo
getmininginfo
getnetworkhashps [blocks]
getnewaddress [account]
getpeerinfo
getrawmempool
getrawtransaction
getreceivedbyaccount
getreceivedbyaddress
gettransaction
getwork [data]
getworkex [data, coinbase]
help [command]
importprivkey
keypoolrefill
listaccounts [minconf=1]
listreceivedbyaccount [minconf=1] [includeempty=false]
listreceivedbyaddress [minconf=1] [includeempty=false]
listsinceblock [blockhash] [target-confirmations]
listtransactions [account] [count=10] [from=0]
listunspent [minconf=1] [maxconf=999999]
move
sendfrom
sendmany
sendrawtransaction
sendtoaddress
setaccount
setgenerate
setmininput
settxfee
signmessage
signrawtransaction
stop
validateaddress
verifymessage
Jump to: