Maybe you haven't paid attention that she has degree in political science and economics. That she graduated with a Juris Doctor, has been worked as district attorney, attorney general and in U.S. Senate. Etc...
Craig Wright has a PhD. Does that make him smart? I don't care what she is on paper, but what she says in public, how she acts and all that tells me she's not very smart, or maybe just socially awkward and cannot speak in front of a camera? Just listen to some of the things she said and google her best quotes. She's a master of speaking without actually saying anything.
That exactly what I have thought about the current state of this race, to be honest. People are underestimating the degree of sexism there is still rooting within the society of the United States, it was already difficult for the people of the United States to elect their first non-white president why Barrack Obama..I simply do not think American society is actually ready for a non-white woman to become their next commander in chief and leader of the country. Trump will capitalize on those who believe the president of the United States is supposed to be a man, instead of a woman, that is for sure.
That's why she will play 2 cards at once this time. Woman and minority.
I would go much further.
Most people with degrees these days appear to be total imbeciles, IF they hold onto that education and pretend it taught them everything.
Whenever I interview someone these days; if they are dismissive of their university education and say things along the lines of
"I didn't really learn much or learned the wrong thing but I took this out of it..."
they have my attention.
Interesting that you went on dissing education, because uneducated often as they are seen as a threat and i don't really get the reason behind that. Sure there are dumb people with degrees like there are different kind of degrees, but i wasn't just talking about PHD, but about her whole CV. And are these really your best arguments? Because this is getting really vague.
If you had something concrete to say, i am sure that you could link to actual quotes, instead of saying "She's a master of speaking without actually saying anything." Because by doing so, you are doing exactly that; you don't have any substance in your argument and you aren't saying anything concrete. But i guess gaslighting is a common tactic these days.
Meanwhile i can point to literal plans of the project 2025, and countless unedited quotes where trump mumbles something nonsensical or implies to end democracy in US. I can point to his proven crimes and convictions. That's harder to do with Kamala Harris.. and yeah, she might not be your beloved convicted creepy rapist that has accusations for molesting 13 year old girls, but i guess we have different values if i don't want us going that road.
And before you go and argue that Kamala is DEI, (which is probably coming again), here's a handy little reminder in a picture form: