JollyGood probably is a defamator because I didn't see any proof of connection between Decryped and 1xbit
If JollyGood doesnt provide any proofs - JollyGood should be redtagged & distrusted, with this reference: "JollyGood is framing his enemies in personal interests by using 1xbit scam franchise"
If a person like Decrypted is redtagged of many btt users this does not mean that it can be framed without evidences
JollyGood made a big mistake
Topic: @JollyGood is a liar and trust system abuser. - page 2. (Read 617 times)
trading account?
Hello,
Im interested to buy 2 clean Senior Member accounts.
I pay $100 for each.
Only escrow.
Im interested to buy 2 clean Senior Member accounts.
I pay $100 for each.
Only escrow.
Yes, I was trading accounts.
part of the 1xbit project?
No, if I want join 1xbit campaign I will try to buy red trust accounts, not clean. It would be much cheaper.
Quote
Thanks for my bounty: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/bc1qyjk5xcrvkc4t9x452wdxdu3t2ps7rmu3c60wz7
As for the rule of not joining with more than one account, it was added day after creating this thread, so after kotwica666 and dodgrad applied.
Only one account was active during the campaign, so the rules were not actually violated.
So kotwica666 was not cheating.
quote DecryptedAs for the rule of not joining with more than one account, it was added day after creating this thread, so after kotwica666 and dodgrad applied.
Only one account was active during the campaign, so the rules were not actually violated.
So kotwica666 was not cheating.
It is bounty for finding two accounts of this same person in their campaign.
Let us know your bitcoin address for the bounty!
BTC address: bc1qyjk5xcrvkc4t9x452wdxdu3t2ps7rmu3c60wz7
Give your address and I will send you that back. I feel like I took a candy from a child.
What do you think this has to do with promoting 1xbit?
Guys! Read the topic: "@JollyGood is a liar and trust system abuser."
I never promoted 1xbit or even intended to do it.
His accusation is a lie and an abuse of trust system.
How about thisI never promoted 1xbit or even intended to do it.
His accusation is a lie and an abuse of trust system.
trading account?
Hello,
Im interested to buy 2 clean Senior Member accounts.
I pay $100 for each.
Only escrow.
Im interested to buy 2 clean Senior Member accounts.
I pay $100 for each.
Only escrow.
part of the 1xbit project?
Quote
Thanks for my bounty: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/bc1qyjk5xcrvkc4t9x452wdxdu3t2ps7rmu3c60wz7
As for the rule of not joining with more than one account, it was added day after creating this thread, so after kotwica666 and dodgrad applied.
Only one account was active during the campaign, so the rules were not actually violated.
So kotwica666 was not cheating.
quote DecryptedAs for the rule of not joining with more than one account, it was added day after creating this thread, so after kotwica666 and dodgrad applied.
Only one account was active during the campaign, so the rules were not actually violated.
So kotwica666 was not cheating.
Guys! Read the topic: "@JollyGood is a liar and trust system abuser."
I never promoted 1xbit or even intended to do it.
His accusation is a lie and an abuse of trust system.
I never promoted 1xbit or even intended to do it.
His accusation is a lie and an abuse of trust system.
Anyone is allowed to give red trust to anyone else, so your last statement is null & void. 
Not only that, but because I have a custom trust list, OP has a trust score of -3. JollyGood's tag isn't the only one OP has received; he's been tagged for account buying/selling in 2018. If that reference link were more recent, I'd be giving OP a neg as well.In any case, there's nothing you or anyone else can do about your trust page, Decrypted. You've presumably been a member here long enough to know that by now (unless you're not the original owner of your account). JollyGood might be harsh with feedback sometimes, but tagging 1xbit promoters is valid as far as I'm concerned.
Anyone is allowed to give red trust to anyone else, so your last statement is null & void.
I don't have time to research whether or not you shilled for 1xbit or not, but if he has proof, I'm sure @Jollygood will certainly stop by and drop it off...
I don't have time to research whether or not you shilled for 1xbit or not, but if he has proof, I'm sure @Jollygood will certainly stop by and drop it off...
@JollyGood is a liar and trust system abuser. This user gave me a negative trust for no reason:
Reference - lead to a thread where there is not a word about me.
He didn't react even after I (aggressively) brought his attention to it.
One more time after he ignored me:
Can you explain how it came to your sick head that I have ever promoted 1xbit?
Later he called me "sock-puppet" and "paid shill", again for no reason:
I have never promoted 1xBit or intended to do so. On the contrary, I have repeatedly criticized the work of the manager of their signature campaign. (there are a lot of posts on this subject in my history, so I won't quote them all here)
It's obvious that for some reason @JollyGood is ignoring me and wanting to spoil my opinion.
This means that he has some hidden purposes, or he is wrong, but despite the fact that he is aware of that, anyway he is giving out a negative trust for no reason.
I would like to draw the attention of other DT members to the fact that the actions of this user are destructive to the meaning of the trust system.
If he does not improve his behavior and explain his false accusations, this person should not be allowed to give a red trust to other users.
Reference - lead to a thread where there is not a word about me.
He didn't react even after I (aggressively) brought his attention to it.
Hey idiot!
You gave me red trust for promoting 1xbit, but where do you see i'm doing anything like that?
I think you have some mental problems, don't you?
You gave me red trust for promoting 1xbit, but where do you see i'm doing anything like that?
I think you have some mental problems, don't you?
One more time after he ignored me:
Can you explain how it came to your sick head that I have ever promoted 1xbit?
Later he called me "sock-puppet" and "paid shill", again for no reason:
Thank you TwitchySeal, I will continue to ignore the sock-puppets and paid shills 
I think the best response I have to them is to continue adding more names to the list that is in the OP. 1xbit have introduced a new colourful avatar and are pushing out their new "5" signature and that is all the more reason for forum members to get together to at least try to highlight the 1xbit scammers and those that spread their propaganda because it will hopefully end up saving some newbies from getting scammed.
People like him don't get attention in real life so they try to satisfy their craving here on the forum... more importantly in what way? the most retarded way.
Considering all participants are tagged he still doesn't stop being a Relentless whore.
JollyWood is not sooo Good.
You seem pretty upset by what he's doing.
Keep it up JollyGood.
I think the best response I have to them is to continue adding more names to the list that is in the OP. 1xbit have introduced a new colourful avatar and are pushing out their new "5" signature and that is all the more reason for forum members to get together to at least try to highlight the 1xbit scammers and those that spread their propaganda because it will hopefully end up saving some newbies from getting scammed.
Hey idiot!
People like him don't get attention in real life so they try to satisfy their craving here on the forum... more importantly in what way? the most retarded way.
Considering all participants are tagged he still doesn't stop being a Relentless whore.
JollyWood is not sooo Good.
You seem pretty upset by what he's doing.
Keep it up JollyGood.
I have never promoted 1xBit or intended to do so. On the contrary, I have repeatedly criticized the work of the manager of their signature campaign. (there are a lot of posts on this subject in my history, so I won't quote them all here)
It's obvious that for some reason @JollyGood is ignoring me and wanting to spoil my opinion.
This means that he has some hidden purposes, or he is wrong, but despite the fact that he is aware of that, anyway he is giving out a negative trust for no reason.
I would like to draw the attention of other DT members to the fact that the actions of this user are destructive to the meaning of the trust system.
If he does not improve his behavior and explain his false accusations, this person should not be allowed to give a red trust to other users.
Jump to: