Infinite law of probability should not be used as a mathematical stance when in regards to statistical gambling Douglas. If that was the case surely this would have happened by someone at sometime during the past 100 years.
I've no idea what you're referring to or what you mean. Maybe quote the point I made that you're disagreeing with; that might help.
Are you saying that just because there's a 1 in 1024 chance of losing 10 50/50 rolls in a row you can't use that fact when looking at a sequence of real dice rolls? Because that sounds silly to me. But I can't think what else you're getting at.
And that looks like a photo of something that happened. Some time during the past 100 years someone folded up some clothes and put them in a dryer. But what's your point?
The point is law of probability is a farce and not mathematics. According to the infinite law of probability by putting your wet clothes into a dryer some day or time they will be perfectly folded and organized which we both know is not a reality. I'm not necessarily arguing any particular comment you made accept the fact 1 in 1024 chances is assuming the particular program is legitimate. Now we both know I think Just-Dice is but should only be used if a legitimate 3rd party has the winning/losing draws prior to the roll. If not any scam company could claim as such which is a green card for cheats and scammers to exploit legitimate customers.
