Was this :
originally present in the description ?
I would like to restrict the usage of my money to funding the pool.
Quote
Your investment may also be used to fund promotions, or anything else the site owner considers to be beneficial to the overall growth of the site's bankroll. Given the anonymous nature of investing, it is impossible to gain consent of all investors before making decisions about how to use invested funds, so I am claiming the right to do whatever I consider best for the site with them.
originally present in the description ?
I would like to restrict the usage of my money to funding the pool.
it was not.
Ok, so then I'll add another suggestion : "when people lend you their money you don't get to change the rules underway", which intersects quite nicely with "make a GPG contract that I can review and hold you accountable against".
but somehow it was considered "too complicated."
I call it simple, issue shares, IPO them, problem solved. Shares are an investment in the management, lending money to the pool is a rational gamble.And that obviously doesn't prevent from using some raised capital to fund the pool (depending on how the IPO is made and the shares issued), at the management's discretion.
Divest, pool has plenty of capital, it doesn't need yours. Issuing shares is illegal. GPG contracts are unenforceable.
