Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 1216. (Read 5352229 times)

at 39PH, 4 blocks with 10 hours to go UTC - impressive!

Block by xxcsu with 64TH/s!  Welcome to the Acclaim Board with your 1st Kano block!  This is our 4th of the day! 

Block by Banneddk

Block by Sierra8561

absolutely - I'm shutting down while I travel from Thurs - so you can bet they will happen after that...................

....a few back to back blocks now will be super!

Block (and payouts) by altonoff
Rem block http://bdn.i.ntere.st/p/21156277/image

My personal experience is excellent. Alan and his partner are really good people. Most of my fire power is with them and it's been for over a year now.

I've had four machines hosted at Cryptoboreas since early March and it's been a positive experience. I was initially skeptical about having machines collocated at a facility that I didn't have VPN access to, but since their power cost is so low and Alan has overwhelmingly positive feedback I bit the bullet. If, for whatever reason, Bitmain decides to drop their prices or Avalon can produce a reasonable alternative asic, I'll be sending new machines up there.

Someone just hit a block on the solo pool...woo-hoo!

EDIT: It occurred to me that we may not hear anything from Canaan until after the China holiday...

Block by victor889 with 23TH/s!  Welcome to the Acclaim Board with your 1st Kano block!  This is our 2nd block of the day! 

Yeah, but the problem is that even if we have almost always jumped back with 'reversing' good luck after bad, that's actually not statistically expected.
The statistical expectation is always 100%
What that means is we expect to always converge back to 100%
Good luck doesn't mean we expect bad luck to follow, nor the reverse, bad luck doesn't expect good luck to follow.
Statistically, we always expect average luck to follow, here and every other pool.

Of course what does follow is random ... but that's a completely different thing ... called hindsight

Edit: but yes I still spend the same amount of effort, each time I'm processing payouts, checking for problems with miners ...

Edit2: and luck being luck ... oh well, 2 close ones in the last 16 hours (UTC times)

Edit3: I've added to my todo list a page to show share stats in the last 24hrs and maybe longer depending on how much data it takes to keep a week's worth of high diff shares e.g. something like 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 90%, 100%+ (=blocks)
and also to add statistics about the numbers expected per diff change - the most relevant being how many blocks we expected per diff change (and up to now) vs how many found.
The changes I'm leading into at the moment relating to having distributed ckdb's, requires a change that will easily lead to having these numbers available - whereas to show them at the moment would require more ram storage (of the data that is already there, just not summarised)

THIS - look up above

I wouldn't mind a quick series of 10 (5%) blocks to make up for the crappy luck.

tich13 punching out 2 of the last 3 blocks!   Now that's totally the chit!! 

Block 

Methinks Carlos Hathcock would agree with that as well...

Geez...that's too easy.

And in keeping with the animals sighting in...