Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 1883. (Read 5352140 times)

has this pool ever had back to back in its history 

has this pool ever had back to back in its history  

Yeah SG went down at 2016-01-05 16:37:51 UTC - sorry about that, I've not yet setup the alerts to wake me up on those new nodes.
I will make sure I do that today.

I restarted it at 2016-01-05 19:22:48 UTC (23min ago) and it's showing now back up to 135THs

My fastest miner S7 is doing a SHARE RATE of 3.93THs and a HASH RATE of 4.90THs , why does that differ ?

What is what and is that normal ? my slower miners does not have that big difference.

https://i.imgur.com/GqJLH8F.jpg

This copy of S7 is overclocked to 750 Mhz, it have no X-ed CPUs in the status box.

I'm curious, given the pool has increased in size almost 4X over the past couple weeks, does this shift development priorities for "working on thing X" to "working on thing Y"?  Is there more incentive to work on certain aspects of the pool given it's growth, or are development priorities such that they area independent of pool size?  Since I am just a "dust miner" I expect my perspective of what should be done with the pool would be much different than someone running 100+ TH, just wondering if development has a similar experience.
...

Yes, I am working on something....
And yes the math was wrong too.

Yeah I actually thought 'now' was already in the API ...
when I noticed this missing the other day, I added 'STAMP' in immediately.

...
I hate date/time stuff, I really should just switch everything over to UTC like Kano has, and just use the new STAMP feature he added to the API... It is on the todo list.

28 Date input formats
*********************

First, a quote:

     Our units of temporal measurement, from seconds on up to months,
     are so complicated, asymmetrical and disjunctive so as to make
     coherent mental reckoning in time all but impossible.  Indeed, had
     some tyrannical god contrived to enslave our minds to time, to make
     it all but impossible for us to escape subjection to sodden
     routines and unpleasant surprises, he could hardly have done better
     than handing down our present system.  It is like a set of
     trapezoidal building blocks, with no vertical or horizontal
     surfaces, like a language in which the simplest thought demands
     ornate constructions, useless particles and lengthy
     circumlocutions.  Unlike the more successful patterns of language
     and science, which enable us to face experience boldly or at least
     level-headedly, our system of temporal calculation silently and
     persistently encourages our terror of time.

     … It is as though architects had to measure length in feet, width
     in meters and height in ells; as though basic instruction manuals
     demanded a knowledge of five different languages.  It is no wonder
     then that we often look into our own immediate past or future, last
     Tuesday or a week from Sunday, with feelings of helpless confusion.
     …

     —Robert Grudin, ‘Time and the Art of Living’.

Yeah, I'm looking into this right now, I'm not sure why we did not get two emails.
At first I thought the blocks were too close together, but they were about 10 minutes apart so that should have been fine.

Why is the miner reward less than 25btc?  Is that because the tx fees were less than the pool's share of the reward?

Block   Block UTC   Miner Reward   N Diff   N Range   Pool N Avg   Your %   Your N Diff   Your N Avg   Your BTC
391920   5/Jan 20:36   24.99505891   523.218G   73hr 9m 51s   8.53PHs   0.04%   209.644M   3.42THs   0.01001504

Sweet back to back blocks!

Block   Block UTC   Miner Reward   N Diff   N Range   Pool N Avg   Your %   Your N Diff   Your N Avg   Your BTC
391920   5/Jan 20:36   24.99505891   523.218G   73hr 9m 51s   8.53PHs   0.04%   209.644M   3.42THs   0.01001504
391919   5/Jan 20:26   25.01420270   521.906G   72hr 59m 31s   8.53PHs   0.04%   208.708M   3.41THs   0.01000307

Yes it have been running for a week, and no connection on the backup pool today.

Edit : Now i check again and the SHARE RATE is 4.72THs now. So i´m not sure... have the pool done a restart last hour ?

Is it a problem with pingtime between sweden and the pool ?

But anyway, what is the difference between hash rate and share rate ?

"Share Rate" and "«Elapsed" are initialised when the miner first connects.
"Share Rate" and "«Elapsed" reset every network block.

Their aim is to inform you: if you are connecting properly and sending shares properly.

"Share Rate" is the number of shares you have submitted in "«Elapsed" then converted to a hash rate.
The very first second that you connect to the pool, they will report the shares you have submitted since "«Elapsed"
Thus it has high variance, but has the specific use of being able to see the shares you are submitting, immediately.
They are not trying to tell you your accurate hash rate.
They are telling you that you are connected to the pool properly and sending shares properly.

Has that rig been on the pool more than an hour?

Has that rig been on the pool more than an hour?

My fastest miner S7 is doing a SHARE RATE of 3.93THs and a HASH RATE of 4.90THs , why does that differ ?

What is what and is that normal ? my slower miners does not have that big difference.

https://i.imgur.com/GqJLH8F.jpg

This copy of S7 is overclocked to 750 Mhz, it have no X-ed CPUs in the status box.