Author

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 2187. (Read 5352067 times)

full member
Activity: 932
Merit: 100
arcs-chain.com
Its a little hard to understand that 500% for me it is anyway  Grin

If Ive got a clue it goes like this

Pool speed ~5PH one have to be mining ~48h to get 500% (when difficulty increase this takes longer)
Pool speed ~2,5 PH have to mine ~96h to get 500%

If one starts mining and a block is then found in 5% , miner gets 1% of the full payout. Then next block lets say 20%, miner gets 5% and so on... And the other way then when a miner quits mining, payouts decrease until all 500% is used. If I´m right when quitting whatever % miner has reached payouts continue until mined blocks sum is 500%

So if a miner has started with the current round which is now at 218% and it hits now a block(i hope) miner could expect 218/5=43% of full payment.
hero member
Activity: 777
Merit: 1003
I have 4,8 TH (you can see me at the pool)
https://www.miningrigrentals.com/rigs/4161

block 339486 - 0.00188319 BTC
block 339552 - 0.00823398 btc
block 339586 - 0.00579804 btc

1MfoQRP8wGUA82w5RTuonL2n9mK3hYrzm9

I had more than 0.1% of block when blocks was found

25btc : 1000 = 0,025

I feel disappointed

You were only on the pool for 12 hours, which was about 150% so you were not on for the full 500%.
You should notice that you still get a couple more payouts because you were part of the 500% of the next couple blocks.

If your going to rent rigs for use on a PPLNS Pool, I would suggest you rent for a couple days.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
I have 4,8 TH (you can see me at the pool)
https://www.miningrigrentals.com/rigs/4161


block 339486 - 0.00188319 BTC
block 339552 - 0.00823398 btc
block 339586 - 0.00579804 btc

1MfoQRP8wGUA82w5RTuonL2n9mK3hYrzm9

I had more than 0.1% of block when blocks was found

25btc : 1000 = 0,025

I feel disappointed

This is PPLNS at work.  You haven't reached the 500% threshold yet.  When you do, payouts will be around the expected size.  It also means if/when you leave, your payouts will slowly decrease, just like they slowly increased.

Be patient with it.  This high PPLNS setting hurts pool jumpers.  Dedicates miners come out ahead.

M
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
I have 4,8 TH (you can see me at the pool)
https://www.miningrigrentals.com/rigs/4161


block 339486 - 0.00188319 BTC
block 339552 - 0.00823398 btc
block 339586 - 0.00579804 btc

1MfoQRP8wGUA82w5RTuonL2n9mK3hYrzm9

I had more than 0.1% of block when blocks was found

25btc : 1000 = 0,025


I feel disappointed





legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
Payouts 339486, 339552 and 339586 sent
https://blockchain.info/block/000000000000000008ca2e89c0d532408b45a110b0a7d1f7bad5fe13dd78b6c5
https://blockchain.info/tx/1b12231245c57ddcec6913de55e2959463dcd40e1e1032212e0fe897fb8fa17e
https://blockchain.info/tx/cebbcf022f9b1ba1ae963daa901c21093d56cfe43d791948263009f04c825614
https://blockchain.info/tx/79d35037e4a8a1fef8b7e910e6321c7080fa9b5251157905b6d09ae1a433c862
 It looks as if this is an orphan.?.
Suggest New Payout Policy- When Multiple Payouts have been prepared, they will be sent in separate blocks. This will reduce the likely hood that more than 1 payout could be included at an Orphaned Block Height.


Edit:  They Confirmed now at Coinbase. First transaction attempt was Block #339780, second attempt confirmed in block#339790.
https://blockchain.info/block/00000000000000000f6f6f736d67a4e5e196c67215c4af67c242a1e54e8a1507
info/tx links above are still valid, the tx now shows which two blocks it was included in and the time stamp.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
Payouts 339486, 339552 and 339586 sent

Kano, I didn't receive any of these; my wallet is 1LjZmRdMV7Mk88bx7oMMWgKWaFF8yG1qtp. Could you please check on it?

The payments still appear to be unconfirmed.

M

They all 3 show confirmed in my Coinbase wallet

They are confirmed now.  They took a while.

M
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1000
Payouts 339486, 339552 and 339586 sent

Kano, I didn't receive any of these; my wallet is 1LjZmRdMV7Mk88bx7oMMWgKWaFF8yG1qtp. Could you please check on it?

The payments still appear to be unconfirmed.

M

They all 3 show confirmed in my Coinbase wallet
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
Payouts 339486, 339552 and 339586 sent

Kano, I didn't receive any of these; my wallet is 1LjZmRdMV7Mk88bx7oMMWgKWaFF8yG1qtp. Could you please check on it?

The payments still appear to be unconfirmed.

M
hero member
Activity: 543
Merit: 500
Payouts 339486, 339552 and 339586 sent

Kano, I didn't receive any of these; my wallet is 1LjZmRdMV7Mk88bx7oMMWgKWaFF8yG1qtp. Could you please check on it?

Edit: These showed up now.
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
Payouts 339486, 339552 and 339586 sent
https://blockchain.info/block/000000000000000008ca2e89c0d532408b45a110b0a7d1f7bad5fe13dd78b6c5
https://blockchain.info/tx/1b12231245c57ddcec6913de55e2959463dcd40e1e1032212e0fe897fb8fa17e
https://blockchain.info/tx/cebbcf022f9b1ba1ae963daa901c21093d56cfe43d791948263009f04c825614
https://blockchain.info/tx/79d35037e4a8a1fef8b7e910e6321c7080fa9b5251157905b6d09ae1a433c862
 It looks as if this is an orphan.?.
Suggest New Payout Policy- When Multiple Payouts have been prepared, they will be sent in separate blocks. This will reduce the likely hood that more than 1 payout could be included at an Orphaned Block Height.


Edit:  They Confirmed now at Coinbase. First transaction attempt was Block #339780, second attempt confirmed in block#339790.
https://blockchain.info/block/00000000000000000f6f6f736d67a4e5e196c67215c4af67c242a1e54e8a1507
info/tx links above are still valid, the tx now shows which two blocks it was included in and the time stamp.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
Friends don't let friends use Seagate.  Tongue

I have a pair of 4TB HGST Deskstar NAS drives, trucking along for over a year, no problems.  They're Backblaze's favourite drives, too.  Everything else I have is WD, and they've been perfect, I really can't remember the last drive failure I had, might have been a 2TB Seagate Barracuda LP, back when those were new and shiny.  I even run a pair of WD Blue 500GB as the system drives in my NAS, and they're not supposed to be run 24/7 and they're going fine.
Yeah I prefer WD for everything and all my client servers I'm pretty sure over the years I've only put WD in them.
When I saw the Hybrids about the same price I thought they sounded good: SSD buffer in front of the HDD
Well, I guess as usual, if it sounds too good it isn't as good as you think it is Tongue

I've also found that testdisk (the linux program) can read most of one of them - so I got a few 'unimportant' files back that I wanted also Smiley
On that one, the corruptions are in the journal and the superblocks - and any access to those locks up for a few seconds and then gives an error, so they are certainly royally screwed Sad

P.S. thanks everyone for the donations! It's added up to almost 0.6BTC!

Did you try Spinrite?

M
member
Activity: 71
Merit: 10
Payouts 339486, 339552 and 339586 sent

How about 339451 ?
legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Friends don't let friends use Seagate.  Tongue

I have a pair of 4TB HGST Deskstar NAS drives, trucking along for over a year, no problems.  They're Backblaze's favourite drives, too.  Everything else I have is WD, and they've been perfect, I really can't remember the last drive failure I had, might have been a 2TB Seagate Barracuda LP, back when those were new and shiny.  I even run a pair of WD Blue 500GB as the system drives in my NAS, and they're not supposed to be run 24/7 and they're going fine.
Yeah I prefer WD for everything and all my client servers I'm pretty sure over the years I've only put WD in them.
When I saw the Hybrids about the same price I thought they sounded good: SSD buffer in front of the HDD
Well, I guess as usual, if it sounds too good it isn't as good as you think it is Tongue

I've also found that testdisk (the linux program) can read most of one of them - so I got a few 'unimportant' files back that I wanted also Smiley
On that one, the corruptions are in the journal and the superblocks - and any access to those locks up for a few seconds and then gives an error, so they are certainly royally screwed Sad

P.S. thanks everyone for the donations! It's added up to almost 0.6BTC!
legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Payouts 339486, 339552 and 339586 sent
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
Are stats out of sorts?  It keeps showing one of my workers at difficult 1698 when I specifically have it set to 2048.

M

S5s returning after failover have the same problem. I had to restart them. 

That did the trick.  Thanks!

M
sr. member
Activity: 440
Merit: 250
Are stats out of sorts?  It keeps showing one of my workers at difficult 1698 when I specifically have it set to 2048.

M

S5s returning after failover have the same problem. I had to restart them. 
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
Why not payment yet still 99 btc

Payouts have been delayed since yesterday - had a server failure at home.
No data lost or anything like that, I have backups of all that is important run every day.

...

Edit: and of course it doesn't stop the pool running at all

M
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
Are stats out of sorts?  It keeps showing one of my workers at difficult 1698 when I specifically have it set to 2048.

M
legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1004
Why not payment yet still 99 btc
hero member
Activity: 1246
Merit: 501
Friends don't let friends use Seagate.  Tongue

I have a pair of 4TB HGST Deskstar NAS drives, trucking along for over a year, no problems.  They're Backblaze's favourite drives, too.  Everything else I have is WD, and they've been perfect, I really can't remember the last drive failure I had, might have been a 2TB Seagate Barracuda LP, back when those were new and shiny.  I even run a pair of WD Blue 500GB as the system drives in my NAS, and they're not supposed to be run 24/7 and they're going fine.
Jump to: