Author

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 2190. (Read 5352747 times)

legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Payout 339388 sent

Still having some trouble with the pool.
A few ups and downs, but as long as ckpool doesn't get stuck, it always restarts it 9 seconds after it happens.

... but not stopping us from finding blocks at all!
Web page shows the last 42 blocks at 67.53% which is like ... amazing luck.
67.53% = sum of shares received for each block / sum of each block network difficulty
100% would mean we average at the expected average.
67.53% means we've found the 42, roughly 1.5 times faster than expected

But yes I do sleep ... a least a few hours a day Cheesy
Since at least some of you liked that last competition, especially the winner I'm sure, it seems like we may be able to run another one shortly from another supplier, this time with 2 of the same prize ... will put up details very soon.
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1001
and here he is.....controlling the world.....



Gosh I always figure more like this...

legendary
Activity: 1019
Merit: 1001
Spectreproject Community Manager
and here he is.....controlling the world.....

full member
Activity: 166
Merit: 100
Kano, do you ever sleep?

Makes me wonder too...

i think it's a android... skynet is here...

legendary
Activity: 1019
Merit: 1001
Spectreproject Community Manager
Zach , your charts give a good look at things.
And wow, 10 blocks in last three days sure is impressive.
everything seems to be settling down.

Kano, do you ever sleep?
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1001
My miners just switched over to other pools again...
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Kicking ass and taking names!  Cheesy

Still having a little trouble with the pool - but only done a few very quick restarts.
Though we did find that last block during this.
ckpool performs well even under duress Cheesy

There's 2 users mining that are trying to connect over and over and failing:
One who has an invalid bitcoin address: 1DZUF1cZDQBpHcVWCy8FtBxu1uqxbqJxz2mb
The other with a username not setup on the web site: Raulito

Would be good if they both sorted out their miner settings or created accounts Smiley

ckolivas has sorted out the error messages they were causing, but still be better if they setup properly.
Payout 339338 sent
hero member
Activity: 1249
Merit: 506
Kicking ass and taking names!  Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
I got Satoshi's avatar!
i did notice that. i also noticed my best share actually shows up for the solo pool. it was my first time there since switching my failover pool earlier today.
If you are address mining and checking the stats with
 http://www.kano.is/address.php?a=1abc or http://www.kano.is/worker.php?a=1abc_worker
you will now see that extra information here also
Thanks Kano!
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
i did notice that. i also noticed my best share actually shows up for the solo pool. it was my first time there since switching my failover pool earlier today.
If you are address mining and checking the stats with
 http://www.kano.is/address.php?a=1abc or http://www.kano.is/worker.php?a=1abc_worker
you will now see that extra information here also
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
My first is: stratum+tcp://stratum.kano.is:3333

If that connection goes down I have this: stratum+tcp://stratum80.kano.is:80

Is it possible for stratum 3333 to go down and stratum80 to still work?  

It could be if 3333 is down that 80 will be down as well and what I'm doing is negligible. 

I would think so under a certain circumstance.  Is it worth it to do that and have another pool for third?
Both ports point to the same ckpool instance.
If one port got blocked due to a ddos or other such issues not part of ckpool, then having the 2nd one would help in that case.
ckdb only supports one backend ckpool at the moment and that's not high on the priorities so will be a way off before that's changed.
cgminer itself handles having multiple active and multiple backup pools - as you realise - and that should resolve any pool outages.

P.S. I've switched ckpool over to the latest version already also.
sr. member
Activity: 478
Merit: 250
i did notice that. i also noticed my best share actually shows up for the solo pool. it was my first time there since switching my failover pool earlier today.
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
For anyone who noticed?
The pool just took a nose dive and crashed.
I've been running an older version of ckpool while ckolivas has been fixing a few problems on the solo pool.
One of the old problems (that has been fixed) reared it's head and took out the pool.
I'm still running that version (when I restarted it after the crash) but will probably move to the latest version now solo seems to be stable.
That should simply be a reconnect message in cgminer when I switch and no real outage or failover when I do it shortly.
Sorry for the short outage that happened.
legendary
Activity: 1019
Merit: 1001
Spectreproject Community Manager
... and a bit of news, especially for those who have been mining here since we started in September.

That last block we just got, 339388, https://blockchain.info/block/00000000000000000088ea4d769abcf758d8d18d68d457abf083e515c4d12437
it the 100th successful block we've found (plus one orphan after the 1st block we found)

Happy 100 everyone Cheesy

and Happy 100th to you along with congratulations to you and CK on a great pool.
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Payout 339298 sent and confirmed
... and we got block 101 while I was doing that Smiley
Payout 339316 sent and confirmed
sr. member
Activity: 471
Merit: 250
Damn we are on fire today!

Yep, all going well  Cheesy

My hash power will be down for 16hrs due to a local electricity supplier problem  Angry

hero member
Activity: 1249
Merit: 506
Damn we are on fire today!
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
... and a bit of news, especially for those who have been mining here since we started in September.

That last block we just got, 339388, https://blockchain.info/block/00000000000000000088ea4d769abcf758d8d18d68d457abf083e515c4d12437
it the 100th successful block we've found (plus one orphan after the 1st block we found)

Happy 100 everyone Cheesy

Would you be able to list the block numbers on the website with reverse numbering, but same order, so that we can see the "true" block #?  Right now #1 is actually #100.

M
IRC half an hour ago Smiley
Code:
07:57 < kanoi_> (the actual block # on the blocks page is somewhere far down the todo list :P)
hero member
Activity: 1249
Merit: 506
... and a bit of news, especially for those who have been mining here since we started in September.

That last block we just got, 339388, https://blockchain.info/block/00000000000000000088ea4d769abcf758d8d18d68d457abf083e515c4d12437
it the 100th successful block we've found (plus one orphan after the 1st block we found)

Happy 100 everyone Cheesy
Congrats everyone. I haven't been here since the beginning,  but it's been a fun few months!
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
... and a bit of news, especially for those who have been mining here since we started in September.

That last block we just got, 339388, https://blockchain.info/block/00000000000000000088ea4d769abcf758d8d18d68d457abf083e515c4d12437
it the 100th successful block we've found (plus one orphan after the 1st block we found)

Happy 100 everyone Cheesy

Would you be able to list the block numbers on the website with reverse numbering, but same order, so that we can see the "true" block #?  Right now #1 is actually #100.

M
Jump to: