KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 987.

Apprentice

full member

Activity: 500

Merit: 105

Quote from: ComputerGenie on April 29, 2017, 02:33:45 PM

Quote from: Apprentice on April 29, 2017, 02:23:05 PM

I wasn't aware that you can remove a hashing board and still use use the miner. good to know

am running on T9s and keeping the room temperature at 17C. Thinking or relocating the miner to work in a cold room at 4C

). the Operating Temperature on their specs is 0°C to 40°C

Just don't power that board and remove the ribbon cable from either end. We have rigs with 1, 2, 3, and 4 cards.

I guess bitmain do not sell parts? you simply have to send the miner for repair?

ComputerGenie

hero member

Activity: 1092

Merit: 552

Retired IRCX God

Quote from: Apprentice on April 29, 2017, 02:23:05 PM

I wasn't aware that you can remove a hashing board and still use use the miner. good to know

am running on T9s and keeping the room temperature at 17C. Thinking or relocating the miner to work in a cold room at 4C

). the Operating Temperature on their specs is 0°C to 40°C

Just don't power that board and remove the ribbon cable from either end. We have rigs with 1, 2, 3, and 4 cards.

Apprentice

full member

Activity: 500

Merit: 105

Quote from: wmabern on April 29, 2017, 01:04:12 PM

Quote from: smutboy420 on April 29, 2017, 12:46:01 PM

Quote from: wmabern on April 29, 2017, 12:34:48 PM

Quote from: smutboy420 on April 29, 2017, 08:05:44 AM

~~~snip

Wow that had to get pretty hot if it caused the s9 to shut down from over heat protection. Bitmain claims the s9s overheat protection kicks in at 125C on the chip 2 temps compared to only 80c on the s7s So if that is the case that the s9s can go that high of a temp before shutting down it would have to be pretty ripping hot.

All I know is my Awesome Miner application showed that the S9 miner had shut down because of high temps. I wasn't here at the time.
I have removed the board I determined was faulty and the two remaining boards are hashing just fine within normal temps. Not sure what happened as I was at work.

It's another hot one around here today. Outdoor temps already 86F. But all the miner temps are within a good range.

COMEONBLOCKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!! Cheesy

That really sucks if it went in to a high temp shut down and dint come back. Seems as if they should lower the temp it shuts off so it shuts off before it burns up.

Yes, it completely shut down and was not hashing at all, but was still getting power to all boards and the controller. That's why when I looked on the Kano pool worker page and saw one miner was showing zero hash, I knew something was very wrong. Luckily, I work only about 10-15 minutes from home. So I rushed home and unplugged it from the power outlets.
I didn't have time to trouble shoot then because I had to get back to work. It was only after I got home later that I realized a board was dead. Sad

It will have to wait for repair as money is tight. Undecided

I wasn't aware that you can remove a hashing board and still use use the miner. good to know

am running on T9s and keeping the room temperature at 17C. Thinking or relocating the miner to work in a cold room at 4C

). the Operating Temperature on their specs is 0°C to 40°C

wmabern

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Visualize whirledps

Quote from: smutboy420 on April 29, 2017, 12:46:01 PM

Quote from: wmabern on April 29, 2017, 12:34:48 PM

Quote from: smutboy420 on April 29, 2017, 08:05:44 AM

~~~snip

Wow that had to get pretty hot if it caused the s9 to shut down from over heat protection. Bitmain claims the s9s overheat protection kicks in at 125C on the chip 2 temps compared to only 80c on the s7s So if that is the case that the s9s can go that high of a temp before shutting down it would have to be pretty ripping hot.

All I know is my Awesome Miner application showed that the S9 miner had shut down because of high temps. I wasn't here at the time.
I have removed the board I determined was faulty and the two remaining boards are hashing just fine within normal temps. Not sure what happened as I was at work.

It's another hot one around here today. Outdoor temps already 86F. But all the miner temps are within a good range.

COMEONBLOCKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!! Cheesy

That really sucks if it went in to a high temp shut down and dint come back. Seems as if they should lower the temp it shuts off so it shuts off before it burns up.

Yes, it completely shut down and was not hashing at all, but was still getting power to all boards and the controller. That's why when I looked on the Kano pool worker page and saw one miner was showing zero hash, I knew something was very wrong. Luckily, I work only about 10-15 minutes from home. So I rushed home and unplugged it from the power outlets.
I didn't have time to trouble shoot then because I had to get back to work. It was only after I got home later that I realized a board was dead. Sad

It will have to wait for repair as money is tight. Undecided

smutboy420

full member

Activity: 341

Merit: 100

Quote from: wmabern on April 29, 2017, 12:34:48 PM

Quote from: smutboy420 on April 29, 2017, 08:05:44 AM

~~~snip

Wow that had to get pretty hot if it caused the s9 to shut down from over heat protection. Bitmain claims the s9s overheat protection kicks in at 125C on the chip 2 temps compared to only 80c on the s7s So if that is the case that the s9s can go that high of a temp before shutting down it would have to be pretty ripping hot.

All I know is my Awesome Miner application showed that the S9 miner had shut down because of high temps. I wasn't here at the time.
I have removed the board I determined was faulty and the two remaining boards are hashing just fine within normal temps. Not sure what happened as I was at work.

It's another hot one around here today. Outdoor temps already 86F. But all the miner temps are within a good range.

COMEONBLOCKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!! Cheesy

That really sucks if it went in to a high temp shut down and dint come back. Seems as if they should lower the temp it shuts off so it shuts off before it burns up.

smutboy420

full member

Activity: 341

Merit: 100

Quote from: stormwind on April 29, 2017, 12:22:26 PM

Hello,

I 've a S9, and I wonder which one is the front fan (the intake?), which one the rear fan (the exhaust?), which one should spin harder? Which one is connected on fan1 and which one on fan2 on the controllerboard?

The front which would be the intake side is the end with the network connection, ip button and the reset. and the rear is the other side were the hash boards power plugs are.

The spots on the controller for each fan off the top of my head the connector closer to the front end is for the front fan and the connector for the rear fan is the connector on the board thats closer to the rear.

Sometimes the front fans will spin faster then the rear exhaust fans do. Sometimes they spin about the same. It all depends on the temps and how well the air flow is cooling it down.

wmabern

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Visualize whirledps

Quote from: smutboy420 on April 29, 2017, 08:05:44 AM

~~~snip

Wow that had to get pretty hot if it caused the s9 to shut down from over heat protection. Bitmain claims the s9s overheat protection kicks in at 125C on the chip 2 temps compared to only 80c on the s7s So if that is the case that the s9s can go that high of a temp before shutting down it would have to be pretty ripping hot.

All I know is my Awesome Miner application showed that the S9 miner had shut down because of high temps. I wasn't here at the time.
I have removed the board I determined was faulty and the two remaining boards are hashing just fine within normal temps. Not sure what happened as I was at work.

It's another hot one around here today. Outdoor temps already 86F. But all the miner temps are within a good range.

COMEONBLOCKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!! Cheesy

stormwind

newbie

Activity: 31

Merit: 0

Hello,

I 've a S9, and I wonder which one is the front fan (the intake?), which one the rear fan (the exhaust?), which one should spin harder? Which one is connected on fan1 and which one on fan2 on the controllerboard?

oawan

member

Activity: 67

Merit: 10

Quote from: bronder on April 29, 2017, 10:32:13 AM

Quote from: kano on April 29, 2017, 06:00:22 AM

So we seem to have a battle for first place, at the top of the hash rate list, between cobramining and blockmines!
I think blockmines might take the lead in the next few days (or sooner)

Wow, that looks exciting!
How does someone like me go from having a few old miners (S4,S5,S7) to have PH's worth of mining like cobramining or blockmines? fascinating!

$$$$

Apprentice

full member

Activity: 500

Merit: 105

Quote from: kano on April 29, 2017, 08:05:59 AM

Quote from: Apprentice on April 29, 2017, 07:47:34 AM

Quote from: kano on April 29, 2017, 04:58:57 AM

Quote from: Apprentice on April 29, 2017, 03:05:24 AM

I have joined this pool 5 days ago. it seems the transactions fees are high or probably my calculations/expectations are incorrect.

ie. a payment of 0.00634112 (pool's page) is received as 0.00297679 which is less than half and I do not think it all went as transaction fees which should be 0.0002 if I am not mistaken. ans this is the case with all payments.
Any clarifications please.

The only fee is 0.9% of the total block reward, thus I calculate everyone's reward based on 99.1% of the block reward - which is the amount shown on the rewards page.
There are NO transaction fees receiving payouts from the pool.

If you are not seeing the numbers matching what it says on the Rewards page, then you are either not looking in the right place, or are looking for payouts not yet sent or confirmed.

Read the Help->Payouts page: https://kano.is/index.php?k=payout

If you pay fees to spend you BTC after you get it from the pool, then that's up to you how much they are and how you spend your BTC

Thank you Kano. Love mining in your pool.
I am looking in the right place and comparing the rewards to what I am receiving in my wallet, the amount is less than half (using Electrum)

Hint #2 ... they aren't in order

I'd of course need your pool username or payout address to show you that.
Use PM for payout address, or username here or PM.
It's easiest to simply look on blocktrail with your payout address
e.g. https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/address/1xxxxxxxxxxxx/transactions
That will show them correctly.
If your wallet isn't showing the same then there's, of course, an issue with your wallet.

Thanks! I love tip #2!
Was looking at payments in order.
just received April 28 payment

bronder

newbie

Activity: 48

Merit: 0

Quote from: kano on April 29, 2017, 06:00:22 AM

So we seem to have a battle for first place, at the top of the hash rate list, between cobramining and blockmines!
I think blockmines might take the lead in the next few days (or sooner)

Wow, that looks exciting!
How does someone like me go from having a few old miners (S4,S5,S7) to have PH's worth of mining like cobramining or blockmines? fascinating!

smutboy420

full member

Activity: 341

Merit: 100

Quote from: Apprentice on April 29, 2017, 07:47:34 AM

Quote from: kano on April 29, 2017, 04:58:57 AM

Quote from: Apprentice on April 29, 2017, 03:05:24 AM

I have joined this pool 5 days ago. it seems the transactions fees are high or probably my calculations/expectations are incorrect.

ie. a payment of 0.00634112 (pool's page) is received as 0.00297679 which is less than half and I do not think it all went as transaction fees which should be 0.0002 if I am not mistaken. ans this is the case with all payments.
Any clarifications please.

The only fee is 0.9% of the total block reward, thus I calculate everyone's reward based on 99.1% of the block reward - which is the amount shown on the rewards page.
There are NO transaction fees receiving payouts from the pool.

If you are not seeing the numbers matching what it says on the Rewards page, then you are either not looking in the right place, or are looking for payouts not yet sent or confirmed.

Read the Help->Payouts page: https://kano.is/index.php?k=payout

If you pay fees to spend you BTC after you get it from the pool, then that's up to you how much they are and how you spend your BTC

Thank you Kano. Love mining in your pool.
I am looking in the right place and comparing the rewards to what I am receiving in my wallet, the amount is less than half (using Electrum)

Thats weird I have never gotten any payments that were less then the full amount sent by kano and never have paid any transaction fees to receive btc yet to date from kano. In fact I don't recall every paying any fees to receive payments in my coinbase wallet and even my armory wallet never have any fees to receive.

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: Apprentice on April 29, 2017, 07:47:34 AM

Quote from: kano on April 29, 2017, 04:58:57 AM

Quote from: Apprentice on April 29, 2017, 03:05:24 AM

I have joined this pool 5 days ago. it seems the transactions fees are high or probably my calculations/expectations are incorrect.

ie. a payment of 0.00634112 (pool's page) is received as 0.00297679 which is less than half and I do not think it all went as transaction fees which should be 0.0002 if I am not mistaken. ans this is the case with all payments.
Any clarifications please.

The only fee is 0.9% of the total block reward, thus I calculate everyone's reward based on 99.1% of the block reward - which is the amount shown on the rewards page.
There are NO transaction fees receiving payouts from the pool.

If you are not seeing the numbers matching what it says on the Rewards page, then you are either not looking in the right place, or are looking for payouts not yet sent or confirmed.

Read the Help->Payouts page: https://kano.is/index.php?k=payout

If you pay fees to spend you BTC after you get it from the pool, then that's up to you how much they are and how you spend your BTC

Thank you Kano. Love mining in your pool.
I am looking in the right place and comparing the rewards to what I am receiving in my wallet, the amount is less than half (using Electrum)

Hint #2 ... they aren't in order

I'd of course need your pool username or payout address to show you that.
Use PM for payout address, or username here or PM.
It's easiest to simply look on blocktrail with your payout address
e.g. https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/address/1xxxxxxxxxxxx/transactions
That will show them correctly.
If your wallet isn't showing the same then there's, of course, an issue with your wallet.

smutboy420

full member

Activity: 341

Merit: 100

Quote from: wmabern on April 28, 2017, 12:51:01 PM

Quote from: zOU on April 28, 2017, 03:32:15 AM

Great job everyone !

I'm just a small miner and I have trouble keeping my small hasrate constant (S7 slowly drops after a few days... and 1 S5 just stops mining until physically restarted) but I hang on

I still have 4xS3+ and 2 S5 gathering dust, I will try to add them at some point but they need to be "hidden" so I can host them in a datacenter :p

So I'm looking for an empty 4U chassis to put them in a rack.

I'm a relatively small miner also. Certainly not even close to 1PH! LOL
I was "blasting out" ~55TH with four S9's and an S7 F1 (one fan).

But as of yesterday that number has decreased to three and two-thirds S9's as another hash board has died. Additionally, today is HOT! Mid 80's F (hottest day of the year so far).
So I have the freq. of all my S9's miners turned down to 525MHz and the S7 freq. set to 625MHz as it has very little ventilation. ( But the temps are good.) The S9 chip temps are all running in the low to mid 90'sC. Better to be safe than sorry and perhaps make the miners last a bit longer.

Yesterday, one S9 miner shut down because of high temp. Not sure if the high temp killed the hash board or the hash board failure caused the high temp. Anyway I had to rush home from work to kill the power to the shut-down miner. I was alerted to the problem by logging in to my Kano Pool account at work and seeing one miner with 0 hash.

Anyway, my hash on Kano Pool now is three and two-thirds S9's and a single S7 for a whopping ~45-46TH - at least until the sun goes down and it cools off some. Then I shall jump back to 600MHz which will give me ~ 50-52TH.

Good luck all. Let's crack those blocks!!!

Mine on!!.... And...
COMEONBLOCKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!! Cheesy

Wow that had to get pretty hot if it caused the s9 to shut down from over heat protection. Bitmain claims the s9s overheat protection kicks in at 125C on the chip 2 temps compared to only 80c on the s7s So if that is the case that the s9s can go that high of a temp before shutting down it would have to be pretty ripping hot.

Apprentice

full member

Activity: 500

Merit: 105

Quote from: kano on April 29, 2017, 04:58:57 AM

Quote from: Apprentice on April 29, 2017, 03:05:24 AM

I have joined this pool 5 days ago. it seems the transactions fees are high or probably my calculations/expectations are incorrect.

ie. a payment of 0.00634112 (pool's page) is received as 0.00297679 which is less than half and I do not think it all went as transaction fees which should be 0.0002 if I am not mistaken. ans this is the case with all payments.
Any clarifications please.

The only fee is 0.9% of the total block reward, thus I calculate everyone's reward based on 99.1% of the block reward - which is the amount shown on the rewards page.
There are NO transaction fees receiving payouts from the pool.

If you are not seeing the numbers matching what it says on the Rewards page, then you are either not looking in the right place, or are looking for payouts not yet sent or confirmed.

Read the Help->Payouts page: https://kano.is/index.php?k=payout

If you pay fees to spend you BTC after you get it from the pool, then that's up to you how much they are and how you spend your BTC

Thank you Kano. Love mining in your pool.
I am looking in the right place and comparing the rewards to what I am receiving in my wallet, the amount is less than half (using Electrum)

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

So we seem to have a battle for first place, at the top of the hash rate list, between cobramining and blockmines!
I think blockmines might take the lead in the next few days (or sooner)

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: Apprentice on April 29, 2017, 03:05:24 AM

I have joined this pool 5 days ago. it seems the transactions fees are high or probably my calculations/expectations are incorrect.

ie. a payment of 0.00634112 (pool's page) is received as 0.00297679 which is less than half and I do not think it all went as transaction fees which should be 0.0002 if I am not mistaken. ans this is the case with all payments.
Any clarifications please.

The only fee is 0.9% of the total block reward, thus I calculate everyone's reward based on 99.1% of the block reward - which is the amount shown on the rewards page.
There are NO transaction fees receiving payouts from the pool.

If you are not seeing the numbers matching what it says on the Rewards page, then you are either not looking in the right place, or are looking for payouts not yet sent or confirmed.

Read the Help->Payouts page: https://kano.is/index.php?k=payout

If you pay fees to spend you BTC after you get it from the pool, then that's up to you how much they are and how you spend your BTC

Apprentice

full member

Activity: 500

Merit: 105

I have joined this pool 5 days ago. it seems the transactions fees are high or probably my calculations/expectations are incorrect.

ie. a payment of 0.00634112 (pool's page) is received as 0.00297679 which is less than half and I do not think it all went as transaction fees which should be 0.0002 if I am not mistaken. ans this is the case with all payments.
Any clarifications please.

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: oawan on April 28, 2017, 11:02:03 PM

Is there a reason all blocks seem to have a limit of ~988kb while almost all other blocks being mined are around ~998kb. 10kb isn't really significant, just curious.

I call it a code 'safety' margin.
It's a (as it says on the opening post) 988,888 limit I use on the bitcoind.
The block change is 88,888 and the rest of the work is 988,888.

oawan

member

Activity: 67

Merit: 10

Is there a reason all blocks seem to have a limit of ~988kb while almost all other blocks being mined are around ~998kb. 10kb isn't really significant, just curious.

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 987. (Read 5352429 times)