Topic: ▂▃▅▆▇⫷[ 🆉🅿🅾🅾🅻.🅲🅰 ]⫸⫷[!KAWPOW!]⫸⫷[ the miners multipool ]⫸ ▇▆▅▃▂ - page 203. (Read 279744 times)

Seems like something is down again. Getting stratum_recv_line failed.

Happens a lot on these public forums... but alas, it is an excellent tool... Ive seen it a lot, but have yet to try it out for myself.... I always use the calc app since there's a hotkey built into my keyboard and I have hashrates for my cards listed as normalizations with my batch threads.


I need to test out these new miner versions.  Been kinda slacking but I have my reasons... also being that I am still using 1080's, 1070's and earlier, I have no personal physical access to the Ti's just yet....

no, they didnt use "code", they just used my test binary (without even a tip or a thanks btw)

From what i understand yes, because at the top of the miner when it starts it says ccminer 2.2, it was just updated by member Skunk. He states he used ccminerTribus 2.1 as the base code to update from.

IS the skunk 2.2 the same as the ccminer 2.2?

Wanted to post up how the new CCminerSkunk2.2 fairs up to my typical lineup of miners on the 1080ti's this is a 3x 1080ti rig i ran the benchmark on. 65% tdp, 200+ core, 500+ mem

https://github.com/signatumd/releases/raw/master/ccminer-2.2-skunk.zip

Working nicely on all algos so far.  Tribus got a nice bump in hashrate.  Haven't noticed any others yet.

How is ccminer 2.2 doing? I haven't tested yet on a lot of algos.

try a different version of ccminer manually... I bet its a version that has broken compile support for the groestl algo....   mining C11 with alexis78 is an example of such a thing happening.

I have not been able to connect to groestl at all when it trys to switch to it, possible connection issue....
it attempts 3 times, then moves on but has failed 23 times to connect today

I added it to my mining rigs, but unfortunately its not yet once broke into the top 5 for profit on my rigs, so since benchmarking it on my rigs, its not been mined again since... I found CCminerTribus 2.1 to have the highest hashing rates on the 1080 and 1080ti's on it

Hi,

I just added the jha algo and SWEEP coin to zpool.

Cheers

Okay  I will delete that post. Thanks for info.

And deleted.

Payouts have changed since you were last mining here. It should be over 0.015BTC for every payout (except for the Sunday payouts).

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-signatum-new-algorithm-fair-launch-no-premine-2030529

No exchange yet so won't be on zpool. Waiting for ccminer 2.2 to mine with Nvidia.

where you seeing this?

Whats this skunk algo all about?

This right here is a good strategy.  I'm going to have to pay attention to this.  Thanks!

FWIW on skien; up to 3Gh on one machine, the diff still hovered between .8 and 1.1....

keep an eye on your share % of an algo for ~10 min-2 hours...  average that percentage, then look at the pools total BTC earned for the last 24 hours... see how good of a theoretical cut you would get....

Take the low % ones, and just throw them out the window (disable in batch), leaving 4-5 algos and only the best earners... you will see more profitability.

Also consider my theory (that keeps proving in my life to be true) that when a hashrate on an algo grows past a certain amount;  profitability feels like the network total hash has increased.  Like skien;  when it was ~30Gh, and I was 1Gh;  I was making insane profits;  but as soon as another 70+Gh ended up there, the profitability flattened out until the hashrate dropped on the pool for a bit.

For nvidia rigs;  I choose skein, neoscrypt, C11, X17, and NIST5 currently.... as an example.  Might help you out.

Keeping the others in the batch allows you to gain the quickest benefit to ming a coin/algo that has suddenly surged in exchange pricing, so it's a double edged sword as to what you choose to do.

Every now and then, on some algos, I see reduced hashrate.  It is usually just a run of unlucky shares (no high results in your work units)....  and is sporadic when it happens.  sometimes just an hour or two, sometimes a day....

skein is notorious for having an odd share-to-hashrate calculation;  cause when you find a share @ lets say a diff of 30, often you will see an identical, or nearly identical sized share right after it....  happens a lot on skien.

I personally have always seen less profit on equihash, and haven't even bothered trying to mine it again since my last test several months ago.