▂▃▅▆▇⫷[ 🆉🅿🅾🅾🅻.🅲🅰 ]⫸⫷[!KAWPOW!]⫸⫷[ the miners multipool ]⫸ ▇▆▅▃▂ - page 229.

crackfoo

legendary

Activity: 3486

Merit: 1126

Quote from: Jaerin on June 15, 2017, 08:31:05 AM

Quote from: crackfoo on June 15, 2017, 06:56:31 AM

Quote from: minerx117 on June 15, 2017, 03:42:12 AM

Seriously noobies worrying about graphs to much...

balance and earnings are still increasing.. thats all that matters

I know right.

The graph is the only means that we have to determine our earnings. If the pool gave some clear indication of the earnings we would have more to go on. A flat graph would indicate that it wasn't going up during that period. Excuse me for wanting to know what the benefit of me mining on the pool is. I mean if you don't want us to mine on the pool I'll be happy to go elsewhere.

Not to mention I sent you a PM on the forums asking a simple questions about what to use for Equihash 2 days ago and you haven't bothered to respond. Seems like you don't really care if people want to mine on your pool or not.

I don't hear you complaining about the spike up after a little "flat" spot... and all those numbers above the graphs... are your earnings. I'm not a developer and didn't code the pool or its graphing.

They're weren't simple questions, you're asking me for advice on what to mine and what software to use. I don't do multiaglo or GPU mining so I have no idea, you've better off just posting in the thread.

Jaerin

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: crackfoo on June 15, 2017, 06:56:31 AM

Quote from: minerx117 on June 15, 2017, 03:42:12 AM

Seriously noobies worrying about graphs to much...

balance and earnings are still increasing.. thats all that matters

I know right.

The graph is the only means that we have to determine our earnings. If the pool gave some clear indication of the earnings we would have more to go on. A flat graph would indicate that it wasn't going up during that period. Excuse me for wanting to know what the benefit of me mining on the pool is. I mean if you don't want us to mine on the pool I'll be happy to go elsewhere.

Not to mention I sent you a PM on the forums asking a simple questions about what to use for Equihash 2 days ago and you haven't bothered to respond. Seems like you don't really care if people want to mine on your pool or not.

crackfoo

legendary

Activity: 3486

Merit: 1126

Quote from: minerx117 on June 15, 2017, 03:42:12 AM

Seriously noobies worrying about graphs to much...

balance and earnings are still increasing.. thats all that matters

I know right.

crackfoo

legendary

Activity: 3486

Merit: 1126

Quote from: ?? on ??

ZCL wallet is in maintanance on bittrex for days, where you sell them crackfoo, I have strong feeling those bastards will delist it after they play enough fees with a closed volume market and we get some dust after that?

it's on ccex and cryptopia.

minerx117

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 256

NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3

Quote from: Storx on June 14, 2017, 08:54:04 PM

Quote from: Jaerin on June 14, 2017, 07:49:45 PM

Seriously what is going on with the earnings? I've been mining full out and for what appears to be over an hour my graph is completely flat

I'm using zpools multialgo method and it seems like it switched me a few times during that period between Lyra2v2, hmq1725, Equihash, Blake2s, and Bitcore. Yet there looks to be almost no earnings gained from any of it. Is there something we don't understand about how earnings are calculated or something?

Is it possible to get some way to get a quantifiable average earnings for the last X period or something besides the totally non-descript balance graph?

mine has been completely flat also, but my total earnings has been increasing.. i think the reporting side of the server is having issues...

Seriously noobies worrying about graphs to much...

balance and earnings are still increasing.. thats all that matters

Storx

full member

Activity: 322

Merit: 233

Quote from: Jaerin on June 14, 2017, 07:49:45 PM

Seriously what is going on with the earnings? I've been mining full out and for what appears to be over an hour my graph is completely flat

I'm using zpools multialgo method and it seems like it switched me a few times during that period between Lyra2v2, hmq1725, Equihash, Blake2s, and Bitcore. Yet there looks to be almost no earnings gained from any of it. Is there something we don't understand about how earnings are calculated or something?

Is it possible to get some way to get a quantifiable average earnings for the last X period or something besides the totally non-descript balance graph?

mine has been completely flat also, but my total earnings has been increasing.. i think the reporting side of the server is having issues...

Jaerin

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Seriously what is going on with the earnings? I've been mining full out and for what appears to be over an hour my graph is completely flat

I'm using zpools multialgo method and it seems like it switched me a few times during that period between Lyra2v2, hmq1725, Equihash, Blake2s, and Bitcore. Yet there looks to be almost no earnings gained from any of it. Is there something we don't understand about how earnings are calculated or something?

Is it possible to get some way to get a quantifiable average earnings for the last X period or something besides the totally non-descript balance graph?

Jaerin

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: cashen on June 14, 2017, 05:41:32 PM

Quote from: Jaerin on June 14, 2017, 05:26:33 PM

Quote from: guytechie on June 13, 2017, 11:51:43 AM

Quote from: zer0k on June 13, 2017, 11:39:59 AM

All of the numbers after each mining algorithm are your hashrates so that the pool can decide which coin is most profitable.
They are not setting the difficulty at all and you need to use d=X as you have in your last command.

So if my rig is getting a total of 1.2ksol/s for Equihash, my factor would be -p equihash=1200?

BTW, I noticed you have a -p -c=BTC,etc,etc,etc. I think the dash before the c=BTC is your problem.

Found a post that equihash should be measured in kSol/sec. So you would want to put 1.2 for equihash

Speaking of Equihash, is the actual correct on the main page? I've seen seen a coin even half of what the actual says it is.

It looks right to me at least right now.

SS of my 3 machines mining:

SS of my frontpage on zpool:

Obviously there is a bit of luck involved, but it actually seems to be showing slightly higher in some cases. It does take a bit to ramp up on the main page because I believe it is a rolling average. I notice it takes a minute or two to get up to what appears full speed on the main page, but I suspect that is just an artifact of the averaging. We'll see how it goes. I'm not sure that Zpool is really worth it to me when I can be mining something like 2200DGB/day and it will go back up in a matter of time. I'll give it some more time and see how it goes.

cashen

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 251

Quote from: Jaerin on June 14, 2017, 05:26:33 PM

Quote from: guytechie on June 13, 2017, 11:51:43 AM

Quote from: zer0k on June 13, 2017, 11:39:59 AM

All of the numbers after each mining algorithm are your hashrates so that the pool can decide which coin is most profitable.
They are not setting the difficulty at all and you need to use d=X as you have in your last command.

So if my rig is getting a total of 1.2ksol/s for Equihash, my factor would be -p equihash=1200?

BTW, I noticed you have a -p -c=BTC,etc,etc,etc. I think the dash before the c=BTC is your problem.

Found a post that equihash should be measured in kSol/sec. So you would want to put 1.2 for equihash

Speaking of Equihash, is the actual correct on the main page? I've seen seen a coin even half of what the actual says it is.

ilitirit

newbie

Activity: 17

Merit: 0

Hmmm... now I regret not screen capping the graph of the hashrates. I've heard people say that it's an issue with the graph code, but I can see a direct correspondence between what it shows and my earnings. Every 1 hour or so I've had to restart my miners because the site shows that my hash rate halves as reported on the site and with it of course my earnings even though my local rate stays constant. This is fixed after a restart, but then after a while it just drops again. I stopped mining on Zpool for a few days because of this, but I started again tonight just to test it. Hopefully this issue has been resolved.

Jaerin

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: guytechie on June 13, 2017, 11:51:43 AM

Quote from: zer0k on June 13, 2017, 11:39:59 AM

All of the numbers after each mining algorithm are your hashrates so that the pool can decide which coin is most profitable.
They are not setting the difficulty at all and you need to use d=X as you have in your last command.

So if my rig is getting a total of 1.2ksol/s for Equihash, my factor would be -p equihash=1200?

BTW, I noticed you have a -p -c=BTC,etc,etc,etc. I think the dash before the c=BTC is your problem.

Found a post that equihash should be measured in kSol/sec. So you would want to put 1.2 for equihash

Storx

full member

Activity: 322

Merit: 233

Quote from: Jaerin on June 14, 2017, 10:40:59 AM

Quote from: cryptoinvestor_x on June 14, 2017, 10:10:13 AM

Seems Blake2s is having issues again with reported hashrates.

Miner displays correct speeds and share submitted but site shows 10% and is effectively reducing percentage of block rewards mined.

Anyone else running into the issue?

I've been only running on this pool for a couple of days and notice that my earnings are fairly significantly lower than I expected them to be. I've had a few outages and non-optimal things running, but still only getting .0127BTC from 7-GTX1080's and 1 GTX1080Ti it seems pretty low to me. I expected closer to .02 at least.

With mining some of these super low volume coins on tiny exchanges I'm not sure how the payout actually works. The estimates coming out of Multipoolminer seem like they are way off compared to what I'm actually seeing realized on the pool. Nicehash miner is paying out pretty much the same with just my 5-1080 mining rig.

I'm not ready to throw the towel in yet considering I'm still tweaking, but something definitely feels off from where I expect it to be. Might just go back to mining up DGB for a while, but was hoping to get some pure BTC instead of having to dump on the DGB market.

I feel ya, the other day i had 8 GTX1080ti's mining zpool and the total earnings to my wallet only increased $12ish for the entire day of mining on zpool.... most days it brings in nice numbers in earnings.. but it seems like 1 or 2 days a week my earnings drop like to 1/4 or 1/2 of the earnings with shares still being accepted on all rigs.. hope its fixed soon

Someone previously mentioned it could be the rigs themselves messing up.. so to correct this "possible" issue i have implemented daily restarts every 24hrs via windows task managing and set the batch file to run on startup so it resumes mining..

crackfoo

legendary

Activity: 3486

Merit: 1126

restarting the server hosting the stratum servers. It was due for a reboot from previous patching.

cryptoinvestor_x

newbie

Activity: 71

Merit: 0

Issue seems to be fixed now.

I like the pool and some days when everythings working it's definitely worthwhile. However I've noticed quite a few times a week this happens where I might have to split my rigs so that I get some consistent payouts vs risking it all on zpool.

If you need any help with testing or examples of when issues are happening let me know. Ideally I'd want to continue using the pool.

scryed

newbie

Activity: 18

Merit: 0

Quote from: cryptoinvestor_x on June 14, 2017, 10:10:13 AM

Seems Blake2s is having issues again with reported hashrates.

Miner displays correct speeds and share submitted but site shows 10% and is effectively reducing percentage of block rewards mined.

Anyone else running into the issue?

I'm also seeing this.

Jaerin

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: cryptoinvestor_x on June 14, 2017, 10:10:13 AM

Seems Blake2s is having issues again with reported hashrates.

Miner displays correct speeds and share submitted but site shows 10% and is effectively reducing percentage of block rewards mined.

Anyone else running into the issue?

I've been only running on this pool for a couple of days and notice that my earnings are fairly significantly lower than I expected them to be. I've had a few outages and non-optimal things running, but still only getting .0127BTC from 7-GTX1080's and 1 GTX1080Ti it seems pretty low to me. I expected closer to .02 at least.

With mining some of these super low volume coins on tiny exchanges I'm not sure how the payout actually works. The estimates coming out of Multipoolminer seem like they are way off compared to what I'm actually seeing realized on the pool. Nicehash miner is paying out pretty much the same with just my 5-1080 mining rig.

I'm not ready to throw the towel in yet considering I'm still tweaking, but something definitely feels off from where I expect it to be. Might just go back to mining up DGB for a while, but was hoping to get some pure BTC instead of having to dump on the DGB market.

cryptoinvestor_x

newbie

Activity: 71

Merit: 0

Seems Blake2s is having issues again with reported hashrates.

Miner displays correct speeds and share submitted but site shows 10% and is effectively reducing percentage of block rewards mined.

Anyone else running into the issue?

miliard

newbie

Activity: 13

Merit: 0

Quote from: SharkOne on June 13, 2017, 10:51:38 PM

I'm currently having a look at the API and there's something I don't understand.

Quote

"bitcore":{
"name":"bitcore",
"port":3556,
"coins":1,
"fees":2,
"hashrate":529168602,
"workers":14,
"estimate_current":"0.00015663",
"estimate_last24h":"0.00015508",
"actual_last24h":"0.17900",
"hashrate_last24h":294483128.4,
"rental_current":"0.23995455"
},

It seems that "actual_last24h" is the same value as displayed on the website, however the "estimate_current" and "estimate_last24" seem to be by a factor of 1000? Is it a different unit?

Which value is used to compute the autoswitching?

Thanks!

First 2 are in BTC and actual_last24h is in mBTC

a4si

newbie

Activity: 31

Merit: 0

Quote from: crackfoo on June 13, 2017, 06:28:50 PM

Quote from: Storx on June 13, 2017, 06:24:22 PM

i am not sure what is up with the immature shares on blake2s, i have immature shares in the couple hundreds now that has been building up since yesterday.. is it backed up?>

Netko takes about 48 hours to confirm blocks. Shares can't get backed up on just one algo. If something backs up it shows on all algos

Does this mean also that at least 48 hours pases before Netko can be sent to exchange in to BTC? If so does it still make sense to mine it given the fact that in long period of 48 hours it's vale may crash and thus be more safer for us to stay and mine only Verge, Taj and other coins which have quick turaround?

I'm just asking to understan how this works, not criticizing;)

SharkOne

newbie

Activity: 18

Merit: 0

I'm currently having a look at the API and there's something I don't understand.

Quote

"bitcore":{
"name":"bitcore",
"port":3556,
"coins":1,
"fees":2,
"hashrate":529168602,
"workers":14,
"estimate_current":"0.00015663",
"estimate_last24h":"0.00015508",
"actual_last24h":"0.17900",
"hashrate_last24h":294483128.4,
"rental_current":"0.23995455"
},

It seems that "actual_last24h" is the same value as displayed on the website, however the "estimate_current" and "estimate_last24" seem to be by a factor of 1000? Is it a different unit?

Which value is used to compute the autoswitching?

Thanks!

Topic: ▂▃▅▆▇⫷[ 🆉🅿🅾🅾🅻.🅲🅰 ]⫸⫷[!KAWPOW!]⫸⫷[ the miners multipool ]⫸ ▇▆▅▃▂ - page 229. (Read 279614 times)