Pages:
Author

Topic: ▂▃▅▆▇⫷[ 🆉🅿🅾🅾🅻.🅲🅰 ]⫸⫷[!KAWPOW!]⫸⫷[ the miners multipool ]⫸ ▇▆▅▃▂ - page 83. (Read 279601 times)

newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
Hi Crackfoo, i m mining ZCL today, but  the pool shows the wrong currency (Syscoin).

http://www.zpool.ca/?address=t1JgRG3waKCwwnwkKya4gKndVT6v2dGXXMw

I think my miner is working, but the pool doesnt show it.
Could you please fix this?
jr. member
Activity: 38
Merit: 1
Its running already, but im unsure about the d=128000 setting shown on the frontpage of zpool.ca
Does it do anything?

It should change the default difficulty to a level appropriate for the compute power of the L3+. Generally speaking, the pool will automatically adjust your miner's difficulty based on the rate at which it submits shares. But that can take a few minutes. So better to just set it to the recommended value from the beginning.


Also, I would like to set the payout currency to LTC.
Does it make any sense, can the pool payout in LTC?

Normally you can only be paid out using coins that the pool is currently mining. To my knowledge, LTC is not being mined by zpool. However, if memory serves me, earlier in this thread crackfoo stated that he was manually purchasing LTC so that he could do payouts using that coin. Presumably because it saves on fees for the pool itself. (miners don't pay fees directly; more on that below) There's no guarantee that this is still presently happening, and even if it is, there's no guarantee that it will continue happening indefinitely. So, do this at your own risk.

Which coin would be better to be payed out regarding the high transaction fees of Bitcoin?

As a miner, you needn't worry about transaction fees. Fees are paid not from your balance, but using the fee taken by the pool according to the algorithm (typically 2%). Once you hit the necessary threshold, and assuming you're being paid out in a coin that the pool presently has sufficient quantity, your balance will be paid in full regardless of what the transaction fee comes to on the back end.

Thanks, i got that from the website already.
Why did you put "scrypt" as an argument into the password string?
Thanks

It's redundant in this example, since you're not using profit switching. You can remove it from the password string in this case.
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
Hey there,

Im interested in pointing my L3+ on zpool because it has so much more scrypt coins to mine than MPH.
I hope to not miss out on some profitable coins that are not on MPH. (Is that an right assumption?)

Does anybody have a go-to setting how to do that?
Its running already, but im unsure about the d=128000 setting shown on the frontpage of zpool.ca
Does it do anything?
Also, I would like to set the payout currency to LTC.
Does it make any sense, can the pool payout in LTC?
Which coin would be better to be payed out regarding the high transaction fees of Bitcoin?

Can someone enlighten me with up to date info? Wink

Thanks!
username:  LTC address

Password: c=LTC,scrypt,d=128000

URL: stratum+tcp://scrypt.mine.zpool.ca:3433




Thanks, i got that from the website already.
Why did you put "scrypt" as an argument into the password string?
Thanks
jr. member
Activity: 38
Merit: 1
* values in mBTC/MH/day, per PH for sha256 & GH for scrypt, blake, decred, x11, quark, qubit, kS for equihash
Still at the site there's no notice about GH for keccak.
Also there's no "blake" algo at the pool, it has "blakecoin" and "blake2s". Is blake2s per MH or GH?
Does the pool have dedicated ports for nicehash and rented rigs, or it's Ok to use common ones?

Another way to determine is to go to the pool page for a specific algo, and look at the "Last 24 hours estimate" chart. Both blake2s and blakecoin are measured in mBTC/GH/day. Unfortunately it's not a 100% guarantee that the profitability switcher on the stratum side also uses GH, but it's overwhelmingly the case in my experience.
legendary
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1166
My AR-15 ID's itself as a toaster. Want breakfast?
Hey there,

Im interested in pointing my L3+ on zpool because it has so much more scrypt coins to mine than MPH.
I hope to not miss out on some profitable coins that are not on MPH. (Is that an right assumption?)

Does anybody have a go-to setting how to do that?
Its running already, but im unsure about the d=128000 setting shown on the frontpage of zpool.ca
Does it do anything?
Also, I would like to set the payout currency to LTC.
Does it make any sense, can the pool payout in LTC?
Which coin would be better to be payed out regarding the high transaction fees of Bitcoin?

Can someone enlighten me with up to date info? Wink

Thanks!
username:  LTC address

Password: c=LTC,scrypt,d=128000

URL: stratum+tcp://scrypt.mine.zpool.ca:3433


newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
Hey there,

Im interested in pointing my L3+ on zpool because it has so much more scrypt coins to mine than MPH.
I hope to not miss out on some profitable coins that are not on MPH. (Is that an right assumption?)

Does anybody have a go-to setting how to do that?
Its running already, but im unsure about the d=128000 setting shown on the frontpage of zpool.ca
Does it do anything?
Also, I would like to set the payout currency to LTC.
Does it make any sense, can the pool payout in LTC?
Which coin would be better to be payed out regarding the high transaction fees of Bitcoin?

Can someone enlighten me with up to date info? Wink

Thanks!
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
Greetings and happy new year crackfoo and others.
How come I cannot use Segwit adress for payments?
I am getting "recv line failed" error when I put my Segwit adress in wallet field.
Thanks.

Does your address start with "3," or "bc1?" From personal experience, P2SH addresses which begin with "3" should work. I haven't tried a bech32 address which starts with "bc1" so I can't speak to that.

It starts with "bc1". How is zpool "segwit ready" as per first page of this thread when it does not accept segwit address?
Or am I doing something wrong?
sr. member
Activity: 412
Merit: 250
Can someone please paste here settings for sgminer for mining best profitability currency?
newbie
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
* values in mBTC/MH/day, per PH for sha256 & GH for scrypt, blake, decred, x11, quark, qubit, kS for equihash
Still at the site there's no notice about GH for keccak.
Also there's no "blake" algo at the pool, it has "blakecoin" and "blake2s". Is blake2s per MH or GH?
Does the pool have dedicated ports for nicehash and rented rigs, or it's Ok to use common ones?
jr. member
Activity: 38
Merit: 1
Greetings and happy new year crackfoo and others.
How come I cannot use Segwit adress for payments?
I am getting "recv line failed" error when I put my Segwit adress in wallet field.
Thanks.

Does your address start with "3," or "bc1?" From personal experience, P2SH addresses which begin with "3" should work. I haven't tried a bech32 address which starts with "bc1" so I can't speak to that.
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
Greetings and happy new year crackfoo and others.
How come I cannot use Segwit adress for payments?
I am getting "recv line failed" error when I put my Segwit adress in wallet field.
Thanks.
newbie
Activity: 182
Merit: 0
I am currently mining xvg with the x17 algorithm with 4 separate computers with nvidia video cards (10 series) using the latest version of ccminer tpuvrot.  I'm noticing today especially that the hashrate that I'm getting in ccminer is vastly different from the hashrate reported on the zpool.ca website under my wallet address.  For example one of my computers has 3 gtx 1080s and ccminer says I'm getting 29 MH/s consistently but on the website it jumps from 16 MH/s to 20MH/s which I find to be significantly different.  What is going on?  I just want to make sure it's not something on my end like I'm using a computer with 3 video cards connected, or all the computer are coming from the same ip address going to the same wallet.  I saw other people mentioned this earlier but with no real answer. 

I'm guessing the algo you're mining hasn't found a block in a while. At least, that's what normally causes my hashrate on the website to appear slower than it should. I think the website is bad at calculating hashrate for shares which end up being discarded because the block isn't found by our pool. In any case, it's just an estimate, and you aren't paid based on your hashrate anyway. You're paid based on submitted shares for a found block.

also its seems as if most of the pools on the site have either been under a DDOS attack, or NiceHack is flooding newbs with lambo rigs onto each pool in turn causing them to fall over.

when you see 4000+ miners on X17 and an average hash rate of 10MH/sec per miner, there's fuckery afoot.
jr. member
Activity: 38
Merit: 1
I am currently mining xvg with the x17 algorithm with 4 separate computers with nvidia video cards (10 series) using the latest version of ccminer tpuvrot.  I'm noticing today especially that the hashrate that I'm getting in ccminer is vastly different from the hashrate reported on the zpool.ca website under my wallet address.  For example one of my computers has 3 gtx 1080s and ccminer says I'm getting 29 MH/s consistently but on the website it jumps from 16 MH/s to 20MH/s which I find to be significantly different.  What is going on?  I just want to make sure it's not something on my end like I'm using a computer with 3 video cards connected, or all the computer are coming from the same ip address going to the same wallet.  I saw other people mentioned this earlier but with no real answer. 

I'm guessing the algo you're mining hasn't found a block in a while. At least, that's what normally causes my hashrate on the website to appear slower than it should. I think the website is bad at calculating hashrate for shares which end up being discarded because the block isn't found by our pool. In any case, it's just an estimate, and you aren't paid based on your hashrate anyway. You're paid based on submitted shares for a found block.
newbie
Activity: 182
Merit: 0
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
I am currently mining xvg with the x17 algorithm with 4 separate computers with nvidia video cards (10 series) using the latest version of ccminer tpuvrot.  I'm noticing today especially that the hashrate that I'm getting in ccminer is vastly different from the hashrate reported on the zpool.ca website under my wallet address.  For example one of my computers has 3 gtx 1080s and ccminer says I'm getting 29 MH/s consistently but on the website it jumps from 16 MH/s to 20MH/s which I find to be significantly different.  What is going on?  I just want to make sure it's not something on my end like I'm using a computer with 3 video cards connected, or all the computer are coming from the same ip address going to the same wallet.  I saw other people mentioned this earlier but with no real answer. 
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
Please, help me. I have a few Baikal miners.
I'm able to mine directly only by Cube - sgminer/5.5.2-b (c=BTC,x11,x13=1000,x14=1000,qubit ...)
I'm not able to connect by giant and giant+ (sgminers 5.5.5b, 5.5.6b). Reports pool as dead. Same settings as Cube. But it works over proxy server. Whats wrong with zpool?
newbie
Activity: 182
Merit: 0
Is there any way to decrease the frequency of payouts?  Say once a week max?

Use an external wallet that lets you export a transaction list to CSV for XLS, or ask your exchange for a transaction report.
jr. member
Activity: 38
Merit: 1
Is there any way to decrease the frequency of payouts?  Say once a week max?

Unfortunately not. Payouts occur automatically based on balance. However, you don't directly pay for the transfer fee when the payout occurs. The transfer fee is paid by zpool, using the 2% fee that's collected on everything mined. So, you needn't be worried about transfer fees cutting into your balance. You will be paid out in full based on the accrued balance.
member
Activity: 294
Merit: 16
Is there any way to decrease the frequency of payouts?  Say once a week max?
Pages:
Jump to: