Pages:
Author

Topic: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2021 Q2) - page 192. (Read 171590 times)

legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1213
Dont be a ShitcoInfluencer for quick bux, it sucks
Let me kickstart the process of neg tagging by starting out with yet another alt account of our old friend AngelFalls and his legion of alt accounts. First three are already negged though.

Accounts Connected:

ZeusIsBack

AngelFalls,

Lauda_1,

Lauda_V,

mastaromer1,

Proof:

Why ZeusIsBack and AngelFalls are connected? This has been confirmed by lauda and the discussion was in this thread in these two pages.
http://archive.is/KgonO
http://archive.is/MlIpc

This guy is trying to sell accounts as well as an alt of this AngelFalls and his related alt accounts which have been neg tagged previously.
Previous attempts at selling accounts - The language is similar and they all ask for "good feedback" from their "customers"  Shocked
http://archive.is/71FX1
http://archive.is/PjTTZ
https://archive.is/FEjaC

mastaromer1 is his new account - http://archive.is/Uy8zm

Related Addresses:None

Miscellaneous: DT members tag this new scumbag to his family of scumbags ASAP

*TheUltraElite awaits for retaliatory negative feedback on his account from the scumbags Grin Grin Grin*
legendary
Activity: 3556
Merit: 4191
Actually you don't share a pw to give others access to edit the sheet. You have to enter a persons email address and send them access. If you planned on giving others access to a sheet, just choose 2 ppl you trust not to allow others access
legendary
Activity: 3626
Merit: 2209
💲🏎️💨🚓
I have to admit I don't use Google Spread sheets, although I'm guessing Google has made it simple enough even I could use it...

The two previous threads relied on the OP to maintain "the list" so I had that in the back of my mind that I would be needing to allocate regular time to do that task.  If three or four people have access to editing "the list" (echo echo) and one sends the password to their friend who wants to do some third party editing - then the password gets spread around... Sooner or later, you either have no list or "Screw Flanders" five hundred times...

I also feel that some of the flack recently being generated was aimed at Lauda who didn't do himself any favours by playing into their Belly Aching TM instead of just letting the exposed UID/Alts huff and puff and blowing out to sea.

At the top of the first post I can add links to the "Jump To:" section eg:

Quote
Jump to: Form | Known Alts thread Mk II Mk I | The list 2018 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2019 Q1 (and so on...) | BCT PGP/GPG Public Key Database | Resources | Level of awesomeness | Donations | Mk III | Last Edited 10th December 2017

"The list" echo echo doesn't really need to be on the first page as long as there is a clear path to its location and back to the OP, besides anyone worth their weight in paper wallets can use the search function at the top right of the all pages of this (and every thread) to search "the list" echo echo skies darken...

OTOH ...

I *could* start a separate thread for *just* "the list" echo echo ground shakes, trees sway which I could lock and post a summary of the previous Quarter's findings.  That way the list follows on from one quarter to the next.  Investigations, Red Paint TM and Belly Aching TM here; summary list in a locked thread used for reference only over there.

No?
legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1213
Dont be a ShitcoInfluencer for quick bux, it sucks
One of the inherant problems with listing the sheer volume of Alts found is the tables become very bloated, so, to that end I would like to try a different approach.
How about listing everything in a google spreadsheet page (like the way campaign managers do)? You can have everything well organized in it.

Update:
The problem is,who would have access to edit the spreed-sheet ? Everybody or a few selected users ?
Few trustworthy users, would be more than enough + maintaining a google spreadsheet is much easier than how initially it was being listed (IMO).

I would second this idea.
Whenever an alt spammer or shitposter alt account is discovered the person who investigates on this can post their proofs here in this thread in the proper format as given in the OP. Again there can be a google form for this too which can be prepared by TimeLord or Lauda or someone else. That form may be modified in future if needed. Then the DT members can add this to the spreadsheet and keep it updated on any other future information.

A spreadsheet will keep the thread spam to a minimum. Anyone who needs a review may post a new thread here like "Wrong accusation of accounts being linked" and post proper proof in their defense. I know this idea may seem a bit off (so to speak) because then what will happen is that every other accused person will claim that the account belongs to their sister,brother,half-sister,half-brother and so on. But legitimate claims can be reviewed upon.
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1115
Providing AI/ChatGpt Services - PM!
One of the inherant problems with listing the sheer volume of Alts found is the tables become very bloated, so, to that end I would like to try a different approach.
How about listing everything in a google spreadsheet page (like the way campaign managers do)? You can have everything well organized in it.
The problem is,who would have access to edit the spreed-sheet ? Everybody or a few selected users ? If TL has to maintain the sheet individually,there would be too much efforts to filter the alt-accounts and selectively update them to the spreed-sheet.Not worth his time I suppose.

He could add maintainers who also will have access rights to the sheet.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 3406
Crypto Swap Exchange
One of the inherant problems with listing the sheer volume of Alts found is the tables become very bloated, so, to that end I would like to try a different approach.
How about listing everything in a google spreadsheet page (like the way campaign managers do)? You can have everything well organized in it.

Update:
The problem is,who would have access to edit the spreed-sheet ? Everybody or a few selected users ?
Few trustworthy users, would be more than enough + maintaining a google spreadsheet is much easier than how initially it was being listed (IMO).
legendary
Activity: 3626
Merit: 2209
💲🏎️💨🚓
~~
Which looks better?  Is it clear that each line is a separate set of connections?

Well, if you are keen on choosing 1 of the 2, I'd have to say that the first looks cleaner and a bit more 'well presented'. But hey, thats just me.  Tongue

I'm open to suggestions or other ideas for dot points... (not sure I can do roman numerals, but pretty sure I can do the letters of the alphabet here).
full member
Activity: 322
Merit: 134
~~
Which looks better?  Is it clear that each line is a separate set of connections?

Well, if you are keen on choosing 1 of the 2, I'd have to say that the first looks cleaner and a bit more 'well presented'. But hey, thats just me.  Tongue
legendary
Activity: 3626
Merit: 2209
💲🏎️💨🚓
One of the inherant problems with listing the sheer volume of Alts found is the tables become very bloated, so, to that end I would like to try a different approach.

2018 Q1


Which looks better?  Is it clear that each line is a separate set of connections?
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 6706
Proudly Cycling Merits for Foxpup
If someone is abusing the signature campaigns, advise the coordinator of that campaign. 
Yeah, I did exactly that a few days ago with a moron who had displayed a severe case of shitpost bursting.  Campaign manager said it'll be dealt with come payday, which is fine I guess--but it's kind of letting someone waste a valuable spot in a campaign.  These campaigns are not paying out small amounts anymore, though I'm sure that'll change if the price keeps going up.  It's always strange to me, too, that there are people who apply and get accepted to campaigns and don't make the minimum amount of posts or whatever.

Anyhow, props to Timelord2067 for resurrecting this thread.  I think it's an incredible undertaking, and the amount of alt accounts on bitcointalk is staggering to even contemplate--and I suspect most won't ever be connected.  I see new accounts all the time, saying the same rah-rah crap about bitcoin in one-line, shitty-English sentences.  You know damn well they didn't just discover this forum.  They're alt accounts and probably abusing sig campaigns.  It's sickening, and now I shall go vomit into my designated bucket.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 102

I have decided to start a Mark Three version - [User Generated Mk III] - Known alts of anyone Mk III


I saw MK III and thought it meant Mortal Kombat III. Mark Three isn't as cool  Cry

But even though I haven't been as active as I used to be, thank you for continuing this.
legendary
Activity: 3626
Merit: 2209
💲🏎️💨🚓
So who gives neg trust for alts account? You or Lauda ?

AFAIK Timelord isn't on DT, so if anyone was to neg people, it would most likely be Lauda.

Correct; AFAIK I'm not, but I always give negative trust where appropriate and I encourage others to also give negative trust as well.

I'm not sure what to make of Lauda's post above where he says he's going to slap negatives "more often" other than he'll have more time to sniff them out.  Lauda is not the only person on the DT and as such people posting here should already be aware of who is on the DT that can be called on (from time to time) to help splash Red Paint TM around.  By abruptly closing the Mk II thread without notice and stating in a previous post he won't be participating in this thread, Lauda can't be relied upon from this point forward to help with this task.

If someone is abusing the signature campaigns, advise the coordinator of that campaign.  If they are scamming the currency exchange section, call them out there so others will know.

Don't hide behind someone else dishing out negatives - give the people abusing the system negatives (or neutral) as the case may be.  Remind others to check a person's Trust wall - not just the Trusted, but click on the un-trusted.
full member
Activity: 322
Merit: 134
So who gives neg trust for alts account? You or Lauda ?

AFAIK Timelord isn't on DT, so if anyone was to neg people, it would most likely be Lauda.
full member
Activity: 241
Merit: 117
Satpam BTT 👮
So who gives neg trust for alts account? You or Lauda ?
legendary
Activity: 3626
Merit: 2209
💲🏎️💨🚓
Am porting this from the OP:

Following on from the abrupt termination of the aforementioned thread

[User Generated] - Known alts of anyone https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.25900724 Archive: http://archive.is/A4RIS#selection-4917.0-4921.97

I'm not participating given that it is a unmoderated thread. I'll just be tagging more often, and more faster.

Have fun.
D.



I'll open it up to an initial discussion on how best to go about tabulating said finds in an impartial and meaningful manor.


legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
I'm not participating given that it is a unmoderated thread. I'll just be tagging more often, and more faster.

Have fun.
D.
legendary
Activity: 3626
Merit: 2209
💲🏎️💨🚓
Donations:

Donations can be made to: 1KNoWNMK34nGWz2sJy1JzihZdLCGTKcziw



Donations received will be used as determined by the Investigators of the Known Alts thread.


I am currently holding the following funds on behalf of the following persons/groups within BCT:

WalletAmountWho for?
1KnownMk3gj3DnxLnU9sazk6Lnpj8DoEWaKnown Alts thread
1KNoWNMK34nGWz2sJy1JzihZdLCGTKcziwKnown Alts thread
1KnownXXXNtrjT539vAWckYqWi77jgUXs6Known Alts thread

Total amount held by me BTC 0.019 which is valued at

The previous donations that were made have been sent to the wallet address 1KnownMk3gj3DnxLnU9sazk6Lnpj8DoEWa while the use of the third donation address 1KnownXXXNtrjT539vAWckYqWi77jgUXs6 is yet to be determined.



Donations can also be made to the following:














First backup:

https://loyce.club/archive/details/topic_2544574_2020-07-13_Mon_14.32h.html
https://loyce.club/archive/details/topic_1702409_2020-07-13_Mon_18.52h.html
https://loyce.club/archive/details/topic_1206112_2020-07-13_Mon_18.53h.html

legendary
Activity: 3626
Merit: 2209
💲🏎️💨🚓
Jump to: Submission Form | Known Alts thread Mk II Mk I | BCT PGP/GPG Public Key Database | Resources | Google Spread Sheet (read only) | Level of awesomeness | History of thread | Trust Survey | Donations | BCT Threads: Scam Accusations, Reputation, Currency Exchange | Mk III | Last Edited 2nd March 2018

Additional Resources


Quote
Code:
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----


-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

I added an example how to post the signed message for the blockchain.info part here.






Work in progress.

Additional Resources

legendary
Activity: 3626
Merit: 2209
💲🏎️💨🚓
Reserved #1
legendary
Activity: 3626
Merit: 2209
💲🏎️💨🚓
[User Generated Mk III] - Known alts of anyone Mk III + Mk II + Mk I


[img ]http://s6.postimg.org/p7iub91j5/Known_Alts.png[/img]

Known Alts of any-one - A user Generated List Mk III
Still un-moderated - still hunting scammers and their alts.

Donations can be made to: 1KNoWNMK34nGWz2sJy1JzihZdLCGTKcziw  No donations are being accepted at this time.

Jump to: Submission Form | Known Alts thread Mk II Mk I | BCT PGP/GPG Public Key Database | Resources | Additional Resources | Google Spread Sheet (read only) | Level of awesomeness | Hall of Shame | History of thread | Trust Survey | Donations | BCT Threads: Scam Accusations, Reputation, Currency Exchange | Mk III Wink | Last Updated 1st August 2020

Submission Form for posting:

Anyone who would like to post their finds in this thread are to use this form:

Code:
[b][color=brown]n Accounts Connected:[/color] (Note: Banned shown in [color=red]red[/color] / Inactive in [color=blue]Blue[/color] / Active [url=https://bitcointalk.org/]profile (in ordinary link colour)[/url])[/b]

(Where possible put UID's in numerical order keeping these UID's on the one line) [url=https://bpip.org/Profile?id=#]Username[/url], [url=https://bpip.org/Profile?id=#]Username[/url], [url=https://bpip.org/Profile?id=#]Username[/url], (and so on).

[b][color=#0a80b1]Proof:[/color][/b]

(your proof - Please provide substantial proof that the accounts you listed are owned by one and the same person. Either explain the connection here or link to the explanation.) Ensure you use an archive service such as https://archive.today/ or https://web.archive.org/ to capture a permanent record of the proof.

[b][color=#0a80b1]Reporting:[/color][/b]

These alts have been reported by me in the [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5094661.0]"[Report] Ban Evasion [Requesting Admin/mod to check those and ban]"[/url] thread for ban evasion - Yes / No / Not applicable.

I have marked these user's trust feedback pages with [b][color=red]distrust[/color] / neutral[/b] / no feedback.

[b][color=teal]Related Addresses:[/color][/b]

(any BitCoin (or other alt coins) that connect the UID's - can include such things as Twitter accounts or other Social Media Accounts - List any addresses you have seen the person use. Best: One address per line. Also, use [code ] and [/code ] please.

[i]Miscellaneous:[/i]

Any other comments you may have belong here.




Resources:

Pages:
Jump to: