Topic: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2021 Q2) - page 49. (Read 172262 times)

I'm not going to put up with tit-for-tat complaints on either side.  @ChuckBuck does appear to be a little confused what is acceptable and what isn't, so let me be clear:

 It does not matter if a user and their alts are scammers or not, this thread is a record of those connections.  It is up to the person making the report to choose (or not) to tag a UID.  If they feel a user is cheating and have the evidence to back it up, then their Red Paint ^TM will serve as a warning to others.

If two UID's have used the same wallet address... twitter account ... or whatever it may be, that is not proof in itself that the linked accounts are scamming.  For example - Enrolling in a SigCamp twice is dishonest and not tolerated by the CM's, so Red Paint ^TM is applicable, remembering to advise the CM with a courtesy note and link to this thread.  (BUT don't bombard a CM trivially!).

You can't rely on others to give out negative trust feedback on your behalf, you did the research, YOU leave the trust feedback.  Others will see it (even if you are not DT1 or DT2, if they do their homework, they will see it).

The Lauda's of this world are mercifully fading from memory and the Forum.  When Lauda locked the Mk II thread to start a moderated thread, I beat him to the punch and started this Mk III tread UNMODERATED - i.e. warts and all with the support of the other investigators that were around at that time as they, like me had had enough of the squabbling.  Had Lauda started a moderated thread it would have been a one sided shouting match at anyone coming along.

UNMODERATED means learning to respect other's work and opinions.  It does not mean shouting them down.  Some scammers really are down on their luck - that doesn't mean you have to kick them when they are down. 

Show some respect & be the better person.

Investigate. Tag. Move on.

Simple.

Thank you for the response.
Yes, they are inactive. But the warning is important to let others know. 

I am not trying to overreact. If it is a criticism, I will accept it. But it is not like a criticism, it seems like an insult.
Please read his comment "You are acting selfish, you have been caught cheating, and now you are asking why others are not?"
I don't think it is a criticism, it is an insult.

I know, it is a mistake. No one is perfect.
The most important thing that you realize it and you admit it like a gentleman.
Then, you promise to never do it again.

I have learned much from this. Trust me, I really regretted it.

You are correct, I added neutral trust to the remaining two accounts. They are inactive at this time, but let there be a warning to managers. Neutral trust doesn't matter much. And judging by your participation in the company signature, you were able to agree with the manager. So for your peace of mind, I've added a tag to all of these accounts.
Just advice, do not overreact and do not think that everyone around you is against you. Believe it or not. If you did not try to ruin your reputation, your profile would not appear in this thread. I don't see any aggression in the ChuckBuck responses. Sometimes you need to be able to properly respond to criticism

Look at it carefully!!
I don't ask the question to you.
I ask the question to @lovesmayfamilis.

I also did not use bad words at all. Nor using hate comment.
I am different from you, I ask the question purely as I don't know.

But you always commented negativity when you replied to my post in this thread.
What's wrong with you?
Are you trying to get other's attention and hope for merits?

I know well I have done a mistake. I even have admitted it.
Why mention it again? Please tell me what's your purpose?

---

OP @Timelord2067, please do something to an annoying member like this.
This forum will lose empathy and respect sense among members if a member like @ChuckBuck didn't get a warn.


It is not the first time he made a hate comment to others.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53921446

You are confused here! He's working wonderfully and correctly! Those accounts cannot be tagged by red. Connected accounts are not tagged, only cheating accounts in bounty campaigns will be red-tagged.
You are acting selfish, you have been caught cheating, and now you are asking why others are not?

I checked these accounts, they still didn't get Red-Trust. Is there any reason why they didn't get Red-Trust?
At least, the two accounts must have a note in neutral trust.
Please check again, sir. Maybe you forget to give the Red-Trust mark.  

5 Accounts Connected
Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue)

1.bobyhodob
2.Rohtox
3.monatana
4.Mr.007
5.agis50

Proof:

[ archive ]

[ archive ]

[ archive ]

[ archive ]

[ archive ]

[ archive ]



Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:

cheating in the bounty

1.bobyhodob
2.Rohtox
3.Mr.007


cheating in the bounty 🕵🏻‍♂️[BOUNTY DETECTIVE] 🎓STUDENT COIN DeFi/NFT Platform 1 Million USD Pool🎓
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uycp4sEQD8Tmo23Bfdm-BtwBvy45pmU4qVJYkmnXegU/edit#gid=722669284

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg55625459;topicseen#msg55625459

@AnhEmXe please go back and correct your report so that it looks a little bit more like the Submission Form contained in the first post.

At the moment your "proof" is just a link to another website and has little value on its own (not to mention most people won't go chasing external links).

Thanks.

Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

AnhEmXe (I am the owner)
Steal data for duplicate bounties
1. scoop shot
2. ABS Space
3. vaiking eno

Proof:

https://archive.ph/P1JY1

https://archive.ph/31xZ1

https://archive.ph/s5bJL


Miscellaneous:

Related Alt account case: has Alt's account (Ban evasion) and is fraudulently involved in the campaign.

Some newbies accounts have tried to steal with duplicate, in some bounties Detective

1. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bounty-detective-grandle-500000-grand-reward-pool-distributed-5329623 ( GRANDLE )
2. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bounty-detective-bitnorm-1200000-bn-reward-pool-distributed-5331648 ( BITNORM )

No, you are not mistake in this finding. But, maybe, it's low-level abuse, or in other words, it's not enough to send a negative feedback. In this case, I think there's no need to leave feedback or simply a neutral response to warn, no negative feedback. My personal opinion 

Both accounts did not red tag yet, can anyone make it red?, or I might create a finding mistaken?.

User account named: @Salmanhasan123 was initially involved fraudulently with 3 Alt in a campaign managed by:@CryptopreneurBrainboss.

The rules clearly state it:


However: does not seem to apply to the users below: @Salmanhasan123, continue to create other accounts and get involved in the same case (cheating).

Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. janson420
2. Tramp420

Proof:

Post by: janson420
https://archive.vn/wip/Sml11

---

Proof:

https://archive.vn/wip/RKTTj

https://archive.is/wip/OdMZ9

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:

Their registration page in the campaign.

Topic: [Paused] Burst.Money Bounty || Allocation 310,000 BURST ($837,000) || 60days
https://archive.vn/wip/TxuQl

2 Accounts Connected:Merit abuser:
Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue)

1.Mulann2
2.nicecrypto

Proof:

[ archive ]

[ archive ]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:

Merit abuse.


cheating in the bounty

Despite the manager's warning, these accounts violate the terms.




cheating in the bounty 🔥🔥 [BOUNTY] Stobox: Securities Tokenization ✦ Assets Exchange | $112,500 💰💰
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ATSGa3XIV1Vh4S0RrgqQ4tjjQuJ50XsfM-MtmQ7QaQ0/edit#gid=1847617832

Sorry, but why some members here seem trying to attack me? The latest one, @icopress. Is this your way to get merits from others? Or just post to fulfill your signature campaign? As far as I know, I have no problem with you. And looks like there is another new case of ALT account, but you all don't comment on it? While for my case, I have admitted my mistake, while others keep silent. Do you think those who keep silent better than me?

I feel like a victim here.   I suspect someone is purposely targeting my account.

---

This is one of the reasons why many old members no longer active in this forum anymore.
A member targets an account to be reviled, in order to get appreciation from others.
Sadly, it is allowed by the forum.

---

I think it is enough for my case.
I will stop here.
Thanks all

Nothing personal, but based on your false analogy, a higher rank would lead to more red tags. Say thank you for not getting banned, as I'm pretty sure that if someone takes the time to delve into your post history, plagiarism will be detected, (given the neutral tag from actmyname).

I have no plan to create a new one, what for?
It is very difficult to rank up now. I was lucky that I joined this forum in 2015. In that year, it is not as difficult as today to rank up. I am surprised Bitcointalk forum has difficult rules as today. I regretted I didn't post more and moved up my rank higher (higher than SR) at that time.

Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Doge11
2. Tron11 (Archived)
3. Man22 (Archived)
4. bluerich230

Proof:

https://archive.vn/wip/tQ3ch

https://archive.vn/wip/O00uv

https://archive.vn/wip/9SeIn

https://archive.vn/wip/qyOTt

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:

Related Alt account case: has Alt's account (Ban evasion) and is fraudulently involved in the campaign.

First case:


Second case:
Alt account above is associated with an account named: @See22 and @Man22.

Proof:

Based on a discovery by: @lovesmayfamilis

Trust: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2819175

https://archive.vn/wip/VwaGP

2 Accounts Connected:Merit abuser:
Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue)

1.dhaldanga
2.paglarhat

Proof:

[ archive ]

[ archive ]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:





Ban evasion https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.56797003

What lesson is he going to learn now that his account is pretty much useless, he will only create a new one and learn from the mistakes on this one and not get caught again.

2 Account Connected Merit abuser:

1. scarelia88
2. tono1988

Merit

Address connected;

archived

archived