Topic: [Spammer Blacklist] The Shitlist (Read 7114 times)

The interesting thing is that the current owner of this account appears to have acquired it a bit over five years ago... It's another case of development of severe impediment in cognition or at least ability to write in English.

Old owner:


New owner:


I guess the new owner has had the account for so long that they feel entitled to complain.

I checked modlog after reading his post yesterday, and he had one topic and one post deleted. That's just from the last 7 days. For some reason he thinks those 2 PMs he received about it are meaningless. He's now on my Ignore list. The forum is nicer without reading worthless posts.

I'm curious how you came to the conclusion that you improved the quality of your posts?


btw. You still have a rather bad ratio of deleted posts compared to the number of written posts. Every 10th written was deleted by the moderator. You are currently 294th on the list out of 3.5 million accounts. (Less is worse)

Hello Mr. Actmyname, I hope you are well.

First, I would like to express to you my respect and appreciation for the neutral trust that you gave me in the past, which prompted me to improve the quality of my posts and topics and to pay close attention to every letter I write.

As a result of this neutral trust, which was an incentive for me, I corrected my mistakes and was no longer an unwanted member or a spammer in this great community, which includes moral members like you, sir.

I have made all my efforts and time to correct any weaknesses that have appeared in the level of my publication and the quality of my posts, and you can verify this through my previous topics and posts during the previous months.

I hope that this post will receive your attention and that you reconsider this neutral trust that I deserved in the past, but now I am sure that I do not deserve it, I also hope that you kindly will remove me from the blacklist.

Thank you for giving me another opportunity to continue my learning and benefit the members here with my helpful posts and to participate in the various signature campaigns in order to get a source of livelihood for me. I hope I live up to your expectations.

My full respect and appreciation

Unsure what the question is. If asking for number of reports for a given username on the list, that is located on their trust feedback (if I have specified). If you want to track spammers from your report list, you will have to calculate that yourself. It's simple enough to copy + paste into a text file and parse each line for username + report status.

I have no doubt that you control everything that your signatories write, and in accordance with your view of the quality, you calculate the post's eligibility. The problem is that you set that standard very low, low payment rate and an acceptable large number of posts. Practically an obvious incentive to spam.
For example, it is not possible to write 100+ constructive posts per week in gambling discussion mega threads. Your participants most often write there. The fact is that almost no one reads it.

You have the biggest budget, and the most participants, and the campaign is considered the least quality. This is not just my opinion.

---

How do I count your report by username? do you do it manually or is there an easier method?
I only see the last 50 reports, and sometimes I report a larger number before the moderators act. That statistic is almost useless to me for anything other than the final number and percentage of reported accuracy.

The users on my blacklist are tagged with the number of reports I have personally submitted against them (which were marked Good). Names on the list have at least 50.

---

Time between posts is not entirely important. I have certainly opened multiple threads and replied concurrently before submitting on more than one occasion.

If concerned about spam or post quality, the simplest method is to open up the thread. Redundant reply or non sequitur will encompass most cases.

Hello everyone,

I'm Ogami and I've joined Stake's Campaign Management Team since last October.

So far, I have been checking anything related to AI as well as daily posts. You should always take into consideration that these are not 100% accurate and you have to use more than one tool (even chatgpt has one from his own site), along with the human factor and common sense, because sometimes we have the so-called "false positives".

I have dived into AI ethical questions since last year because I read some problems using it: Improper ways in forums, news sites and newspaper columns, therefore concerning all of us and such knowledge is now required for campaign's recruitment.

The posts that do not comply with general multi-tool and human checks or are considered spam are being deducted from the campaign's participant's pay count (payment). I also want to let it clear that by "spam post" I am referring to people doing too many posts in too short period of time (as we have faced some weeks ago someone with intervals of just a few seconds between one post and another) as we understand it is not enough time to read the ongoing thread and drop an on topic response.

Post's contextual content responsability will be assigned to his owner (who wrote them), on the other hand, omplaints will be handled by campaign's responsible for such cases, which will determine their conclusion (as accepted or not for payment).

Thank you for your understanding.

Marcel Ogami.

I'm sure this is being monitored by the management team they have 7 people checking every participant's posts and this is unacceptable and unfair for the other participants, the forum, and all members of Bitcoin having a guy getting paid using an AI and considering that Stake.com have a grading system and the best poster gets a reward.

I didn't know that. I thought whenever he sees shitposters if he catches them. He puts them in his jail and leaves feedback. I left feedback on this guy, but it's not visible to others. I just noticed icopress left a neutral as well.


Not sure what he is trying to do. He probably doesn't know the forum rules (I guess the forum doesn't have rules regarding AI content yet). Who wants to ruin the account by doing that kind of shit? I did not check his post using an AI content detector. Did you report his post since you found them AI content?

This fits in Stake.com (SteveStake) is encouraging spam.
That topic was created 4 years ago, and it still continues.

I think that he was not looking directly at the quality of the posts here, but only at the number of deleted posts by the moderator.


I just casually looked at tusandii post history, looks like a ton of useless spam.

What is noticeable to me is that all his posts seem generic and it seems that he uses AI help to write posts. I checked some of his posts, some have only a 17%-25% probability of being written by humans or even a 90.8% probability written by AI like this post:


AI Content Detector says:

---

I see that he took a loan from shazan ^{I hope you are using one of the mentioned notifications}, I believe that he is also interested in this matter because due to the possibility of a negative tag and possible exclusion from the campaign, this loan becomes potentially risky.

@actmyname I am wondering how you missed tusandii this guy. A few days ago, efialtis and other forum members discussed how tiny BTCgosu was and where they are now (They have more than 6000 pages now). Suddenly this guy popped up with this post;


Well, BTCgosu is not a casino  . This guy never checked the BTCgosu website or didn't read anything in the BTCgosu thread.

Today, I talked about BCgame and their StableCoin (Token) BCD, launched in Ethereum Chain and listed in UniSwap. This guy popped up with this post and said BCD decreased in Price, and I should wait and hold it until it increased in Price  


Click on those quoted posts to see responses. Moreover, You can go through his post history; I promise you will find a lot like those posts.

How surprising.

Like the mythical hydra, though I would call them anything but Legendary.

---

If I have received a PM for your removal request and I have not yet responded, then you should know which changes need to be made.

Is Nagin on that list.  Probably should be.


Looks like you applied for a campaign for your MFahad account while logged into  Nagin .


https://ninjastic.space/post/61552396

And here's a post where you thought you were logged into Nagin account, but really you were logged into buragTrain

https://ninjastic.space/post/58774357


Ooops, found another one.  You thought you were logged into Nagin, but you were really logged into Handpari


https://ninjastic.space/post/57757703


Have a feeling there are many more if anyone is in the mood to hunt.  Bedtime for me.

he is in 85th place (of 3529391 members) among the top spammers in terms of the number of deleted posts by moderators. judging by info from the neutral feedback, he just continued with the practice of leaving worthless spam posts and it just kept climbing up this negative list.

I sort of understand why you came back to this thread... The fact that you have tried to apply for many signature campaigns, and you haven't been accepted yet. I suggest you try to improve your posting style.

A campaign manager will enroll you regardless of the neutral on your profile because they actually check your post history after you apply.

I checked your last 20 posts, and the 18 English posts aren't worth reading. Your neutral tag is still accurate.

More than 15 months almost passed and i am still waiting for list to be update. I request Actmyname to please check list again and if someone deserve to be removed from the list then it will be better to remove him.

Would be pretty funny if it wasn't showing his genuine effort to say something without actually saying anything.
Don't you know SMF? The one an only Sam Banksman-Fried from the FTZ exchange.

Also, did you know that when a woman gambles inside the house, she doesn't have to go outside?