I hate all those campaigns, in fact, i am never providing my data, it is more than precious for me.
I would not sell all my data for a few tokens that we do not even know if they will be profitable or not. It's like being a whor*.
Topic: KYC at end of bounty campaign - page 20. (Read 3299 times)
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
It seems this way to keep the project from cheating because some bounty participants are using more than one account to get more profit. If using KYC they will avoid it because they are confused how to overcome it and look for other projects.Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
And it's very effective for a convincing project because it can be fairer to share his rewards.
Maybe some people think the same as me, what is their purpose. I think it is impossible for a machine to perform signature campaign tasks. And maybe some people really do not have the requested document.
I belief there is the need to avoid bounty cheaters, it is very common to see many people with alt accounts participating in bounties especially social media campaigns to avoid all these atrocities commited by these cheaters there is a need for KYC at the end of the campaign to ensure paying the genuine participants.
KYC will be relevant if we deal with traditional systems. Maybe some of us want to remain anonymous. And the main problem is the participants know it after the campaign is over.
If you are a real person and you have clean records, you should not fear KYC policy. But to be fair enough to those people who are not willing to disclose their private information, despite of not displaying it publicly, the ICO campaign must announce it before anything else. This way, time and effort will be saved. No more checking too many profiles if not all of those are willing to comply with the KYC policy right?
If you have nothing to hide there's no reason to afraid in submitting KYC, but for the ICO It's must be a part of there regulation before joining the campaign cause some individuals not willing to divulge their identity for some security measures.
This is a cheating manager to get big payouts. this should not be allowed and the manager should be reported with this cheating.
at least he gets red.
at least he gets red.
I think it's not fair if they ask for it after the campaign is over. Some people want to remain anonymous, and no one guarantees our personal documents will not be used for other purposes.
it's very annoying, I do not like kcy because it's so complicated, I've done kyc, I was asked to upload photo ID, I've done it repeatedly but not received
The real question here is, our data safe with them?. KYC is like most of you guys okay with me. Its just I'm not comfortable enough to just give private documents to ICO teams. Especially if they'd just announced out from the end of a campaign that they need these documents like a non-professional team.
I mean we can send them our IDs, Passports and everything they need but they must send us contract or NDA for it, right?
I mean we can send them our IDs, Passports and everything they need but they must send us contract or NDA for it, right?
Actually as long as they actually pay and keep the identity of the participants, I do not think it's a problem. But I strongly agree if such a policy is explained at the start of the campaign.
I think before the game starts, the rules must be clearly stated. It turns out the development process has many problems and the organizer can add, change some rules is correct. But with KYC is completely different! Is it fair that many hard-working and productive hunters are not rewarded just because of KYC?
You have submit and verified your data by using KYC system if you want to get your payment from the bounty cmapaign, always have nesw and information at the end of bounty campaign, where needed submit KYC or not. There are many bounty campaign using submit KYC and you have to do uf you want to get payment. But you have submit your KYC based on the time have giving by bounty campaign management, don’t be late to submit your KYC.
Probably most disagree on this rule. Firstly because it does not want to be identified, secondly, whether it will actually be paid after sending an identity; third, whether the identity will not be used for other purposes.
In fact, I don't really like those bounty which need kec, but if I particularly like that project, then I think I will participate, otherwise I would rather not attend.
Of course, this varies from person to person, and perhaps you are not the same as I think.
Of course, this varies from person to person, and perhaps you are not the same as I think.
I think it's not too good when they ask about in the end. If a project plans to have kyc, they should say about it in the beginning of the campaign
KYC is bad for every campaign. I don't like it, the amount of tokens is so small that as a bounty hunters we should not be checked. We should only accept that we are not from us and that should be enough.
I think KYC good only for the participant from ICO. Usually, a bounty member does not need do KYC.
KYC at the end of bounty campaign i think this is not fair, it is better to statement it at the initial beginning of the bounty so that the participant will be aware so that if any one want to join the person will join.
Some bounties are bound by the law and its a must to perform KYC Procedures to get your bounty rewards. Handling this after the bounty period simpley means the bounty had not prepared well enough to announce the requirements before the program started - they might get advice/ a lawyer halfway the project. This are start-ups expect anything 
Jump to: