Topic: KYC at end of bounty campaign - page 16. (Read 3292 times)
I would never support a project that requires a KYC for bounty. I also wanted to buy some bounty campaigns that I joined, then I never invested. The projects that are seeking the KYC are losing themselves, everyone here wants to remain anonymous
I suppose much easier do ICO without KYC, for instance just step away USA and accept only cryptos
The other thing that also happens is that you get tokens that are locked. I seriously do not like that lack of transparency - if we need to do KYC it is fine, just let us know. If tokens will be locked for XY amount of time, it's fine - just let us know. I would really like to be aware of all the rules before I enter a campaign.
KYC is overall a good practice. It should just be mentioned at the beginning. Same applies to token lock, I personally like it because I think it does not cause extreme price drop, but somebody else might want to sell immediately and he should have that info before entering a campaign.
KYC is overall a good practice. It should just be mentioned at the beginning. Same applies to token lock, I personally like it because I think it does not cause extreme price drop, but somebody else might want to sell immediately and he should have that info before entering a campaign.
Yes indeed frustrating when at the end of the bounty of the company know that will have to undergo the KYC Bautista.It is the attitude towards us and our work.
Really don't like when you know that you need to pass the KYC at the end of bounty, the company,when already a lot of work and spent a lot of time. Better when just write what you want the procedure KYC branch the bounty in big red letters.
I think KYC is the mandatory process at the end of bounty because with KYC process it is easily to identify that the bounty participant is real or fake (Fake means the bounty process is done by a bot).
I think KYC is right for those who have to invest and participate in ICO, but for those who participate in the bounty it should not be required.
ya, bounty hunter should not be required to complete KYC, but project dev can change anything at the end of campaign, complete KYC to receive reward or waste 2 month work? so bounty hunter don't have any choice and we can't do anything
I think KYC is right for those who have to invest and participate in ICO, but for those who participate in the bounty it should not be required.
I think that you need to be notified in advance that when you pay rewards for advertisers, you need to undergo the KYC procedure. If this is not met, it will be a fraud at the last stage of the company's fees, which can spoil the collection of funds. Even if advertisers want to pass KYC, they will most likely use fake documents. What for then this procedure is necessary?
Yes, that's also my sentiments. They shouldn't change the rule at the end of any campaign because many bounty hunters don't want to undergo this process for various reasons and they should respect that. I even suggest one manager indicates on the page if an ICO requires KYC so that the anti-KYC hunters would not join in the campaign and look for another one that don't need KYC. But the manager said the devs refuse to comment. What?!?! It's ridiculous! Why it's hard for some ICOs to decide whether they want their hunters to undergo KYC or not? It only takes a minute or so to decide on this, right? This shouldn't be an issue in the first place if they only make it clear to all participants the rules regarding KYC. This wrong practice should be stopped.
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
This is of course wrong! It shouldn't be! The Manager is obliged to announce in advance that there will be KYC! That would many not did, work and then not refused undergo KYK losing their money,wanting to to remain anonymous! KYC is good, code is declared in the beginning! Many can opt out, thus there will be few participants! So those who did will get more profit!
There is a good effect also having a kyc in fairness because they want to determine if you have a multiple accounts, a lot of members here has a multiple accounts so to be fair with other members they implement this kyc.
Terms of participation can be changed at any stage of the company's bounty. Basically, only for the worse, and demanding identity documents, for participating in the company's bounty is a bad sign.
Of course it's unfair! It takes a place in a single bounty now that is finished and managers asked the participants about KYC. Suddenly. And don't want to send earned tokens because of belonging to the list of "specific" countries. It is a real fraud based on discrimination! To say it frankly.
kyc at the end of the bounty makes many participants give up. they do not take care of the bounty result because they do not like kyc for their privacy. but things like this can benefit participants who approve of the kyc. they will get more allocation because many other participants who do not approve of kyc to get an allocation.
It is vital rules of the game are mentioned before it starts. If you are ready you join. It is not proper, what if anything happens to someone's ID at the time request is made.
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
indeed the existence of KYC rules at the end of the project becomes a new problem for us, they are very unwise to do that. should have been informed of the KYC from the beginning, instead of being told at the end. Rules like this should be changed. Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
I agree that they should let you now that you need to go through this kind of policies to get your tokens but at the same time we are in a period of transition, before you did not needed to go through that process and now that the regulations have changed they are forcing you to do it, so if a bounty campaign started and there were not such regulations and then there was the change that require you to identify yourself I think we cannot blame developers for that, but from now on if they know from the very beginning that they want that you identify yourself then it will be very unethical to not tell their participants from the very beginning. Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
For me having a kyc for each campaign is good to check authenticity of a person joining such campaigns and also to avoid duplicates and bots. But its better if in the first place it will be announced early or before the campaign starts. I hope they also accept government issued id's coz not all who joined campaigns have passports.
to bounty KYC is not good, because we are not investors. I deeply regret with the ico who at the end bounty ask for KYC. they should ask for KYC when the first bounty begins
Jump to: