Topic: KYC of bounty hunters - page 53. (Read 6981 times)
Do you guys think there is a solution to this? On the one hand, requiring everyone to go through KYC is a regulatory requirement for a company, otherwise they may have problems later.
I have no problems submitting my data for bointies.. I don't like to do also KYC for aridrops for generally I partecipated in bounty I trust...
what's the difference between bounty and airdrops?It's both a social media marketing. Why do you think bounty KYC is more safety?
This is certainly a big stupidity, given that the figures involved are ridiculous. In any case, I do not send my data to an unknown entity for a few pennies.
This is already becoming a trend that bounty campaigns say that you need to go through the procedure of the KYC right before the distribution of the tokens.
I think such procedure must be anounced at the start of the bounty and people who don't want to give their data just won't take part in it. It will be fair enough.
This is already becoming a trend that bounty campaigns say that you need to go through the procedure of the KYC right before the distribution of the tokens.
I think it's not right when project managers want to see my personal information. Participants of the bounty do not invest their money. They just do some work for the project. This is true only for investors.
I think that in this situation, every participant of the bounty must decide for himself whether he needs it or not. I am negative about the fact that I will need to disclose my personal information to someone.
Do you think, guys, that those companies hold way too many documents about us? I don't think this is how it should be.
Kyc is ok if project wit responsible support who can explain the reason why did not pass the KYC. For example trackinvest project.
I have no problems submitting my data for bointies.. I don't like to do also KYC for aridrops for generally I partecipated in bounty I trust...
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I think these are the hunters' hurts. This should not be the case, because a network of crypto currency must provide anonymity. And here I have to show my documents to someone unbeknownst to me.
I think for kyc program it is better and security guard on altcoin to be obtained more secure.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I think these are the hunters' hurts. This should not be the case, because a network of crypto currency must provide anonymity. And here I have to show my documents to someone unbeknownst to me. 
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
It might be their rules or the company is based in United States because US have law about bounty programs if I am not mistaken, all token holders must do KYC to avoid money laundering and funding terrorist
Members of the generosity campaign, including those participating in the signature campaign, can not conduct any illegal cash transactions because they do not invest their personal money, thus participating in the ICO campaign. Therefore, it makes no sense to require them to provide identification information or copies of their identity cards. Participants in the signature campaign have the right to perform their work without anyone knowing them.
In any case, the requirement for additional data must be clearly stated before joining the signature campaign. The demand for such data after the termination of the ICO at the stage of payment of earned tokens can actually be regarded as a form of fraud, since in fact they are already being presented for the purpose of not paying the earned tokens.
This is my own point of view
In any case, the requirement for additional data must be clearly stated before joining the signature campaign. The demand for such data after the termination of the ICO at the stage of payment of earned tokens can actually be regarded as a form of fraud, since in fact they are already being presented for the purpose of not paying the earned tokens.
This is my own point of view
kyc is usually requested as a condition of financial rules in a country so if a bounty project comes from a country requiring kyc terms then they will ask for it but not if the state does not ask for that condition
I know bounty program you dont need ID. You can read more detailed information about terms and conditions of participation in Red Lanterns Bounty program here https://goo.gl/YiDJHu
to take part in RL bounty program write to this email [email protected].
to take part in RL bounty program write to this email [email protected].
i'm not usually agree to expose my personal details for projects that held by not reputed companies !!
It's just a step more to a total control of the cryptomarket, but it's against it's core philosophy!
And when you are identified, you don't know where your data will arrive.
I suspect that some airdrops are just made to collect some data.
And when you are identified, you don't know where your data will arrive.
I suspect that some airdrops are just made to collect some data.
This bounty hunters kyc issue is really unbecoming. Kyc is meant for investors and not bounty hunters since they are not customers. Even if their country requires kyc, it is not responsible to ask agents who marketed their product to provide verification.
I saw one recently that offered 50k tokens for KYC Verification. For what???
I saw one recently that offered 50k tokens for KYC Verification. For what???
Jump to: