Topic: Lab Rat Data Processing, LLC (LabRatMining) Official Announcement - page 198. (Read 452224 times)

Its seems like secret for me:





Asked week ago about HW - TOTALLY IGNORED.


Just some talks from LabRat without even "ABOUT" numbers, its so easy to say HOW MUCH IS ORDERED and what is DELIVERY DATE. Its not rocket science, cant be so difficult.
Its even delivered on time or Dave is asshole. No others things can happen.
IT CANT BE LIKE TROWING COIN with question "How much i will deliver to LabRat in this month/week/day".
Its about ORDERED and DELIVERY DATE. If its ordered but not delivered on time - ask for MORE hardware in same price.

And then will be explain from LabRat: "I dont want to give exact numbers because it could go wrong and i will not do as i promised".
If so - I have listened this kind of bullshit from Zerlan about year. You have numbers - Calculate them and then let us know.

And i really dont want to make 1000 posts about asking LABRAT HOW MUCH HARDWARE AND WHEN IS COMING??? only to make you answer those posts.
HARDWARE is NUMBER ONE in this mining company. I DONT CARE HOW DIVIDENTS WILL BE PAID, it can be decided some time later. NOW I CARE ONLY ON NEW HARDWARE AS FAST AS IT IS POSSIBLE.

And when i ask, "What about hardware"? - Please asnwer, because i am not ONLY THAT WANT TO KNOW IT.
Also hashing power has not been changing for MONTH. SO, TRY TO ANSWER!!!

I think you are new here & have not been part of IPO which some of us as are & have seen how it all gone so far from day 1 & have paid ipo price for the shares we bought & see value of shares drop to 1/4th the original price paid for & dividends received so far .. well

Your half ass confidence in LRM , that Lab_rat will make stuff out of his backside if we start asking questions just reflects quite well on what you think about LRM  & you think we are stupid to ask LRM for updates  

IMHO:

I think that LR would probably want to have the hardware in hand and hashing before giving out exact numbers (just a guess - I could be way off, but I know he like to deal in facts, not speculation).  After all, when you are depending on people to deliver, that's a variable that can't be controlled.

He could report 30TH/s arriving tomorrow, then never get it.  I much prefer waiting for some *real* news rather than having LR make any estimates.

Of course.. I'm sure he's working on a way to make things easier for us.  My thinking is the same here as well in that there's no point in giving a running commentary on what's happening so that we all try to micromanage.

cryptobox.pw

Few serious questions , I will start to accumulate these till we have these answered.

labrat,  as orders have been placed can you give us info on how much is on the way.   i dont see why this would be a secret as trading is not possible so it wont effect the bond price.   answering everyone's questions  but ignoring this is frustrating.

https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BwZCh0jtSZkwQXhYSVhzaWZUcmc&usp=sharing

Updated

Those values were only visible in .JSON format not in the html format of the asset list.  The couple that were obvious, but not correct at the time I fixed. EX: " \t \t1birdyVUS7v4gHsruyBFbmGM6YDLJTkNa" = "1birdyVUS7v4gHsruyBFbmGM6YDLJTkNa"

I believe all were fixed and on BitFunder, addresses weren't used for transactions.  They were only used for marking an account.

Thank you... I tried zulover's and couldn't get it until just now....... 6 extra lines at the end later

Thank you, but I read this after replying to Epoch :p

The reason for verification isn't that I'm trying to make sure I know who owns the bonds.  It's that BitFunder (Ukyo) put his own BTC addresses in as default if you didn't put your own in and I don't feel like paying him for something he sure as hell didn't earn.

The same goes for a "final payout" theory as I will not pay BTC to Ukyo for your bonds for the fact that if you come complaining to me, then I have to pay twice.  If for some reason down the road you come back to me and say you've been out of town for 6 months, I'll handle that case by case with a reasonable manner.

Lab_Rat could you please give us a update on projected hashrate & plans for future growth , how do you plan to have trading of LRM shares set-up in future which doesnt rely on PM to you or grnbrg and provides clear visibility of number of sold shares & cost per share.

Armory DL is acting up for me, gotta use a different OS.  If you could just import to QT or blockchain.info that'd be much easier.  Going to grab a different comp tomorrow to set up armory on.

Thanks, to both comments.
Actually, I was thinking of those that had extra characters, street addresses, etc in the BTC address, making them invalid.  I guess the same would apply; the funds got left at BitFunder, unless LR can somehow claim them.  

This was back on p. 58 of this thread:
"Among the BitFunder public keys:
""  - A null key.  This user (Single?, Multiple?) holds several assets.
"14oQSdpw56jv3Xn49EM58nNY5RSDbiPGwr  " - probably valid, but has trailing spaces.
" \tBalance \t 1Dxg9ZazutpaNkS3Yu5NwMsBHuHTRPdkn" - Uhhhhh....
" 155TY9EpfpML46QA5bhYxRkxXpcJJFZfxU" - leading spaces.
"150 Vernon Ave. #400 Vernon, CT. 06066" - Dude.  That's not a bitcoin address.
"https:\/\/blockchain.info\/wallet\/3d0719da-52a1-" - Neither is that.
"e4c966be-7fe4-45fe-a5e1-7781f3081e04" - lolwut?
"13yEHkfHB9Hc7c1JZ15qqSP2Zw8hQugA9k13yEHkfHB9H" - Not a valid address, and a holder of 15 LRM bonds!
"635a91d71c72e64f2be449065407ac59b213eb127b279" - Another LRM holder (2 bonds) who doesn't have a clue.
" \t \t1birdyVUS7v4gHsruyBFbmGM6YDLJTkNa"
There are probably more creative entries.  Just found this on a once-through the assetlist...  "
-----------------
On another matter, just for fun, I just counted the different assets (companies) at BF and found that 18 of the 40 have frozen their trades- no trades in the last (at least) 48 hours.  Guess the rest are non-US.

Those dividends went into the local account of the bondholder at Bitfunder.  They were never distributed via the bitcoin address set up on the bitfunder account.  So they were never an  issue .. until bitfunder punted us out.

The issue is that I think all the LRM bondholder addresses were legal Bitcoin addresses.

The issue is that people added addresses they don't control....  Deposit addresses for exchanges, or wallet addresses for wallets they don't have any more....



grnbrg.

I would like to know what hardware has been ordered, and when it is excepted to arrive.

YES!! This would be nice to know.. What was ordered? when will it get here? when/how much starts to go live, etc.. This is important information...

I completely agree with Epoch.

I have a few nooby questions.
Remember all the shares that were discovered recently where the owners had malformed addresses?
Seems like the transactions would have failed when attempts were made to send dividends (maybe several rounds) to them through BitFunder.

Were attempts made to get the addresses corrected?  And where did those dividend funds go?