LRM hashrate is increasing as we speak... Approx 7TH up so far...
where do u see that?
Instead of bitching and complaining like everyone else, I found a way...
Found a way for what?
Topic: Lab Rat Data Processing, LLC (LabRatMining) Official Announcement - page 86. (Read 452170 times)
March 14, 2014, 03:18:04 AM
where do u see that?
Instead of bitching and complaining like everyone else, I found a way...
Found a way for what?
March 14, 2014, 03:15:22 AM
LRM hashrate is increasing as we speak... Approx 7TH up so far...
where do u see that?
Instead of bitching and complaining like everyone else, I found a way...
March 14, 2014, 03:06:33 AM
LRM hashrate is increasing as we speak... Approx 7TH up so far...
Where do u see that?
March 14, 2014, 02:49:20 AM
LRM hashrate is increasing as we speak... Approx 7TH up so far...
March 14, 2014, 02:09:09 AM
I would really appreciate being whitelisted. It's in place to prevent bots, spammers, and scammers. I'm none of the above and have a previous account that I no longer wish to be associated with. Going through this process a second time is not enjoyable.
Anybody aware of which account L_R was in reference to?
Quoting:
At this point, I don't want to invest more that what I am willing to lose in case Lab_Rat is less then trustworthy. I found it odd that the guy seemingly showed up out of nowhere on BFL's forum, than came over here. I am assuming he's some well known user here, made an account on BFL's forum under a new name, and now running his new identity over here. Not trying to spread rumors or anything. This is entirely speculation. But that's my reason for not investing more.
You are wildly off the mark on this speculation Mufa. Lab_Rat is a hard working, above board and dedicated guy who has been engaged in the community for some time (just not so much on BTCTalk). In my experience he is consistently a positive contributor as mod on the BFL forum (which he quit when forming LRM) and in helping others with their mining questions as larger scale LTC miner and FPGA owner.
What you wrote!
My $.02.
March 13, 2014, 10:56:40 PM
Bittymitty,
For what it's worth. I already noted that point in mind several days ago, but I didn't bring it up yet because I found the same comment posted by Endlessa. When you combine that with all that LR has said publicly, he is obligated to grow the hashrate/bond in proportion with the hardware. The comment Endlessa linked may seem to have a little bit of ambiguity and thus leave a little legal wiggle room, but that doesn't appear to be the case since LR (LRM's official spokesperson) has repeatedly communicated that the bonds hashrates will continually grow with hardware. So, that clears out any ambiguity in the linked comment. Basically, LR must grow bond hashrates proportionately with hardware increases. And I don't think he intends to change that. However, he might try to change the ratio for re-investment. But that will likely increase the threat of legal action of some form. Personally, I think he can leave re-investment at 25%, BUT he needs to eliminate his fee's from the 25% and instead create maybe 4000-5000 new bonds that can compensate him. He would then be rewarded for performance, and not by a mystery fee. Also, he can offer new bonds that people may be more willing to purchase. As it stands, the reputation is tarnished enough that he won't be able to sell new bonds again until protecting investors is priority #1...and terms translate into a solid long term investment. As LR has stated many times, it's a marathon. One can reasonably interpret a marathon investment to mean one that isn't a short or medium term decaying investment.
For what it's worth. I already noted that point in mind several days ago, but I didn't bring it up yet because I found the same comment posted by Endlessa. When you combine that with all that LR has said publicly, he is obligated to grow the hashrate/bond in proportion with the hardware. The comment Endlessa linked may seem to have a little bit of ambiguity and thus leave a little legal wiggle room, but that doesn't appear to be the case since LR (LRM's official spokesperson) has repeatedly communicated that the bonds hashrates will continually grow with hardware. So, that clears out any ambiguity in the linked comment. Basically, LR must grow bond hashrates proportionately with hardware increases. And I don't think he intends to change that. However, he might try to change the ratio for re-investment. But that will likely increase the threat of legal action of some form. Personally, I think he can leave re-investment at 25%, BUT he needs to eliminate his fee's from the 25% and instead create maybe 4000-5000 new bonds that can compensate him. He would then be rewarded for performance, and not by a mystery fee. Also, he can offer new bonds that people may be more willing to purchase. As it stands, the reputation is tarnished enough that he won't be able to sell new bonds again until protecting investors is priority #1...and terms translate into a solid long term investment. As LR has stated many times, it's a marathon. One can reasonably interpret a marathon investment to mean one that isn't a short or medium term decaying investment.
March 13, 2014, 07:42:31 PM
Well since they are illegal as you say their value cant be that high 
LOL funniest shit I have seen in the thread to date... I suppose because cocaine and heroin are illegal they also have very low value? Horrible comparison but see how silly you sound?
And actually the illegal things got mostly a higher value...
March 13, 2014, 07:11:57 PM
I would really appreciate being whitelisted. It's in place to prevent bots, spammers, and scammers. I'm none of the above and have a previous account that I no longer wish to be associated with. Going through this process a second time is not enjoyable.
Anybody aware of which account L_R was in reference to?
March 13, 2014, 07:10:35 PM
Well since they are illegal as you say their value cant be that high
LOL funniest shit I have seen in the thread to date... I suppose because cocaine and heroin are illegal they also have very low value? Horrible comparison but see how silly you sound?
That depends on where you are
March 13, 2014, 06:50:48 PM
Well since they are illegal as you say their value cant be that high
LOL funniest shit I have seen in the thread to date... I suppose because cocaine and heroin are illegal they also have very low value? Horrible comparison but see how silly you sound?
March 13, 2014, 05:31:26 PM
Well since they are illegal as you say their value cant be that high
March 13, 2014, 05:24:20 PM
Make me an offer but i doubt you have enough BTC to cover it.
March 13, 2014, 05:18:58 PM
Your bonds you own seem to be illegal as you say so you should get rid of them quickly. For a reasonable price i will take all your risk
March 13, 2014, 04:08:13 PM
Give it a break. This forum can't help you further, and posting the same question(s) 10 more times will not get you a better response rate. Please address your grievance(s) directly with Labrat.
Exactly this forum does not have the official contract.
There is no contract.
Edit: what about your forum thread selling these bonds? Is the contract on there?
March 13, 2014, 03:56:10 PM
Give it a break. This forum can't help you further, and posting the same question(s) 10 more times will not get you a better response rate. Please address your grievance(s) directly with Labrat.
March 13, 2014, 03:28:29 PM
did you not read the above post?
• This is an announcement of the company and is not a final binding document regarding the IPO. IPO terms will be released as the bonds become available for public trade.
• This is an announcement of the company and is not a final binding document regarding the IPO. IPO terms will be released as the bonds become available for public trade.
March 13, 2014, 03:24:41 PM
March 13, 2014, 03:20:33 PM
Just in case you guys missed it
• This is an announcement of the company and is not a final binding document regarding the IPO. IPO terms will be released as the bonds become available for public trade.
Bonds are being traded publicly - No Document has been supplied.
Please explain.
• This is an announcement of the company and is not a final binding document regarding the IPO. IPO terms will be released as the bonds become available for public trade.
Bonds are being traded publicly - No Document has been supplied.
Please explain.
March 13, 2014, 03:19:13 PM
LR, Things are getting nuts in here... let us know something asap man...
March 13, 2014, 03:13:53 PM
If he created a LLC, there's legal documents defining the nature of the bussiness and all the pertinent details of it.
Jump to: