For what its worth, I get the impression LR is fully intending to "do right" by investors/customers - he is in a hard position and simply (in my mind) chose the wrong solution.
Compared to other companies LR has done very very well for us and after a brief personal exchange with him my genuine feeling is that it is his intention to continue doing so.
What is the hard position he's in? There appears to be more than one solution to keep things rolling as they
effectively have been. Any of these solutions can be implemented. "Hard position" resolved.
What reason would he have to not implement them? He's already bound to his agreement posted on this forum. Nobody was ever sent a different contract to sign and return. And even if anyone did, that would only apply to that one person. As long as people are paid what has been expected from the start per what has been communicated by Zach, then there shouldn't be any issue...should there be?
However, if Labrat were, for example, to say he is capping original investments at 300MH, and not implementing a solution to sustain and grow that return...then... it's almost a certainty that he will get sued. There is enough money in this forum to afford a team of lawyers, and there are people in his area that will help do & serve the paperwork. Small investment to recover a lot. But if he's smart, he won't let it go that far.
