The boards they showed don't even have traces for the chips. How do you explain that?
Meh, sorry. What does "traces" mean in this context? Circuit paths? I'm not that deep into this topic, but maybe they are on the other side? Maybe the board manufactor even screwed up and some layers were not "printed". I have no idea. As far as I know they are in an experimental stage right now and I wouldn't wonder, if they do the tests on breadboards anyway, because they also said they aren't at a productional level yet. Edit:
Ytterbium seems to know more about this.But as said before, there are some things that seem strange, but I also think the current price reflects that. Thus it comes down to the "is it a full blown scam or or" question and I'm clearly in for the later.
Right now people are expecting "something" and Labcoin tries to deliver "something", but it clearly doesn't work to a satisfying degree and the number of angry posters as well as rushed answers from Labcoin shows that.
Edit:
really? you're gonna blame the crash on the shareholders, and not the guys that totally dropped the ball on the "announcement"
No, of course not. As said before "initiated by Labcoin, fueled by posters", dispite that, there was a huge level of tape painting involved.
Yes, trace means the metal connecting electrical paths on the circuitboards. The reason you can't see all of them is because they are multiple layers, so some of them are hidden. Between the layers there are
vias that connect the layers. That's why if you look at a bitfury board, you can't
see any links between the chips and the capacitors or anything else:
As far as the pins on the package vs. the number of pads, that's how most chips are. Here's an actual photo of the Avalon die:
from here As you can see, there are tons of pads around the outside of the chip, yet the external package has just 48 pins:
I'm not trying to defend Labcoin here, but I'm just completely amazed at how bad some of the "technical analysis" that's going on in this thread is.